Abstract
There is widespread opinion that, notwithstanding deviations, the political life of humanity on a large scale is on the path of progress, and humans are becoming freer and more enlightened with time. I am going to contend with this opinion, namely, with a part of it telling that the prevailing mass of the people strives to achieve more freedom and enlightenment. On the opposite, freedom, individual independence, and political rights (not to be confused with social rights, such as state care and protection) are of minor importance to the mass. The ideology of liberalism in its classical form, as created by John Locke, Immanuel Kant, John Stuart Mill and others, yields to the pressure of the ideology of state paternalism. The pressure comes not only from above (that is, from authorities); the people also welcome more paternalism. They appear not to value their individual freedom and independence, and they are inclined to give them up voluntarily to some mighty organization such as the state in exchange for care, protection and leadership. Liberalism has played an important role in the development of human civilization and the formation of the Western world, but new ideologies and political practices are pushing it out of people’s minds. For the author, as adherent of classical liberalism, this is unfortunate. However, I wish to treat this issue realistically, even if the facts conflict with my own convictions and desires.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Badamchi M (2015) Political liberalism for post-Islamist, Muslim-majority societies. Philos Soc Crit 41(7):679–696
Barre EA (2009) Within reason: the Epistemic foundations of Catholic and Muslim Arguments for Political Liberalism. J Soc Christ Ethics 29(1):219–241
Bisley N (2012) Great powers in the changing international order. Lynne Rienner, Boulder
Boettke P (2014) Fearing freedom: the intellectual and spiritual challenge to liberalism. Indep Rev 18(3):343–358
Buchanan J (2005) Afraid to be free: dependency as desideratum. Public Choice 124:19–31
Burke E (2002) Reflections on the revolution in France. Palladium Press, Birmingham
Chebankova E (2014) Contemporary Russian liberalism. Post-Sov Aff 30(5):341–369
de Tocqueville A (2000) ([1835] Democracy in America. Hackett, Indianapolis
Dworkin G (2005) Moral paternalism. Law Philos 24:305–319
Erich F (1994) [1941] Escape from freedom. Holt, N-Y
Etzioni A (2013) The bankruptcy of liberalism and conservatism. Political Sci Q 128(1):39–65
Farer T (2014) The clash of cultures, the tension within liberalism, and the proper limits of tolerance. Human Rights Q 36:1–21
Feinberg J (1986) Harm to self. Oxford University Press, New York
Gray J (1995) [1986] Liberalism, 2nd edn. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
Kant I (1988a) [1784] An answer to the question: what is enlightenment? In: Kant I (ed) Perpetual peace and other essays on politics, history, and morals. Hackett, Indianapolis, pp 41–48
Kant I (1988b) Beantwortung der Frage: was ist Aufklärung? In: Kant I (ed) Rechtslehre. Schriften zur Rechtsphilosophie. Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, pp 213–222
Kant I (1988c) [1793] On the proverb: that may be true in theory, however, is of no practical use. In: Kant I (ed) Perpetual peace and other essays on politics, history, and morals. Hackett, Indianapolis, pp 61–92
Locke J (2003) [1690] Two Treatises of Government. In: Locke J (ed) Two treatises of government and a letter concerning toleration. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 1–211
Mayall J, de Oliveira RS (eds) (2011) The new protectorates: international tutelage and the making of liberal states. C. Hurst & Co., London
Mill JS (1991) [1910] [On] Liberty. In: Mill JS (ed) Utilitarianism. Liberty. Representative Government. Dent and Sons, London, pp 69–185
Morgan M (2013) Liberalism in crisis: a collapsing world order. Millenn J Int Stud 42(1):239–246
Pedersen SK, Koch AK, Nafziger J (2014) Who wants paternalism? Bull Econ Res 66(S1):147–166
Searle JR (1995) The construction of social reality. Free Press, New York
Simons A, McGraw J, Lauchengco D (2011) The sovereignty solution: a commonsense approach to global security. Naval Institute Press, Annapolis
Sleat M (2013) Coercing non-liberal persons: considerations on a more realistic Liberalism. Eur J Political Theory 12(4):347–367
Sorensen G (2011) A liberal order in crisis: choosing between imposition and restraint. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
Sunstein Cass R (2014) Choosing not to choose. Duke Law J 64(1):2–52
Van De Veer D (1986) Paternalistic intervention. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Waldron J (2002) God, Locke, and equality Christian foundations of John Locke’s political thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
White D (2013) Liberalism in Crisis? Khodorkovsky revisited. Stud Transi States Soc 5(1):69–84
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alyushin, A. Liberalism? Forget it. Axiomathes 27, 375–391 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-016-9322-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-016-9322-2