Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Liberalism? Forget it

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Axiomathes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is widespread opinion that, notwithstanding deviations, the political life of humanity on a large scale is on the path of progress, and humans are becoming freer and more enlightened with time. I am going to contend with this opinion, namely, with a part of it telling that the prevailing mass of the people strives to achieve more freedom and enlightenment. On the opposite, freedom, individual independence, and political rights (not to be confused with social rights, such as state care and protection) are of minor importance to the mass. The ideology of liberalism in its classical form, as created by John Locke, Immanuel Kant, John Stuart Mill and others, yields to the pressure of the ideology of state paternalism. The pressure comes not only from above (that is, from authorities); the people also welcome more paternalism. They appear not to value their individual freedom and independence, and they are inclined to give them up voluntarily to some mighty organization such as the state in exchange for care, protection and leadership. Liberalism has played an important role in the development of human civilization and the formation of the Western world, but new ideologies and political practices are pushing it out of people’s minds. For the author, as adherent of classical liberalism, this is unfortunate. However, I wish to treat this issue realistically, even if the facts conflict with my own convictions and desires.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Badamchi M (2015) Political liberalism for post-Islamist, Muslim-majority societies. Philos Soc Crit 41(7):679–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barre EA (2009) Within reason: the Epistemic foundations of Catholic and Muslim Arguments for Political Liberalism. J Soc Christ Ethics 29(1):219–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisley N (2012) Great powers in the changing international order. Lynne Rienner, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettke P (2014) Fearing freedom: the intellectual and spiritual challenge to liberalism. Indep Rev 18(3):343–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan J (2005) Afraid to be free: dependency as desideratum. Public Choice 124:19–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke E (2002) Reflections on the revolution in France. Palladium Press, Birmingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Chebankova E (2014) Contemporary Russian liberalism. Post-Sov Aff 30(5):341–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Tocqueville A (2000) ([1835] Democracy in America. Hackett, Indianapolis

  • Dworkin G (2005) Moral paternalism. Law Philos 24:305–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erich F (1994) [1941] Escape from freedom. Holt, N-Y

  • Etzioni A (2013) The bankruptcy of liberalism and conservatism. Political Sci Q 128(1):39–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farer T (2014) The clash of cultures, the tension within liberalism, and the proper limits of tolerance. Human Rights Q 36:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg J (1986) Harm to self. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray J (1995) [1986] Liberalism, 2nd edn. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

  • Kant I (1988a) [1784] An answer to the question: what is enlightenment? In: Kant I (ed) Perpetual peace and other essays on politics, history, and morals. Hackett, Indianapolis, pp 41–48

  • Kant I (1988b) Beantwortung der Frage: was ist Aufklärung? In: Kant I (ed) Rechtslehre. Schriften zur Rechtsphilosophie. Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, pp 213–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant I (1988c) [1793] On the proverb: that may be true in theory, however, is of no practical use. In: Kant I (ed) Perpetual peace and other essays on politics, history, and morals. Hackett, Indianapolis, pp 61–92

  • Locke J (2003) [1690] Two Treatises of Government. In: Locke J (ed) Two treatises of government and a letter concerning toleration. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 1–211

  • Mayall J, de Oliveira RS (eds) (2011) The new protectorates: international tutelage and the making of liberal states. C. Hurst & Co., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill JS (1991) [1910] [On] Liberty. In: Mill JS (ed) Utilitarianism. Liberty. Representative Government. Dent and Sons, London, pp 69–185

  • Morgan M (2013) Liberalism in crisis: a collapsing world order. Millenn J Int Stud 42(1):239–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen SK, Koch AK, Nafziger J (2014) Who wants paternalism? Bull Econ Res 66(S1):147–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle JR (1995) The construction of social reality. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons A, McGraw J, Lauchengco D (2011) The sovereignty solution: a commonsense approach to global security. Naval Institute Press, Annapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleat M (2013) Coercing non-liberal persons: considerations on a more realistic Liberalism. Eur J Political Theory 12(4):347–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen G (2011) A liberal order in crisis: choosing between imposition and restraint. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein Cass R (2014) Choosing not to choose. Duke Law J 64(1):2–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Van De Veer D (1986) Paternalistic intervention. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Waldron J (2002) God, Locke, and equality Christian foundations of John Locke’s political thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • White D (2013) Liberalism in Crisis? Khodorkovsky revisited. Stud Transi States Soc 5(1):69–84

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexey Alyushin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alyushin, A. Liberalism? Forget it. Axiomathes 27, 375–391 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-016-9322-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-016-9322-2

Keywords

Navigation