Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Controller design for human-robot interaction

  • Published:
Autonomous Robots Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many robotics tasks require a robot to share the same workspace with humans. In such settings, it is important that the robot performs in such a way that does not cause distress to humans in the workspace. In this paper, we address the problem of designing robot controllers which minimize the stress caused by the robot while performing a given task. We present a novel, data-driven algorithm which computes human-friendly trajectories. The algorithm utilizes biofeedback measurements and combines a set of geometric controllers to achieve human friendliness. We evaluate the comfort level of the human using a Galvanic Skin Response (GSR) sensor. We present results from a human tracking task, in which the robot is required to stay within a specified distance without causing high stress values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbeel, P., & Ng, A. Y. (2004). Apprenticeship learning via inverse reinforcement learning. In ICML ’04: proceedings of the twenty-first international conference on machine learning (p. 1). New York: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Abowd, G. D., Dey, A. K., Orr, R., & Brotherton, J. A. (1997). Context-awareness in wearable and ubiquitous computing. In ISWC (pp. 179–180).

  • Bersak, D., McDarby, G., Augenblick, N., McDarby, P., McDonnell, D., McDonald, B., & Karkun, R. (2001). Intelligent biofeedback using an immersive competitive environment. In Ubicomp.

  • Brooks, A. G., & Arkin, R. C. (2007). Behavioral overlays for non-verbal communication expression on a humanoid robot. Autonomous Robots, 22(1), 55–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, H. I., & Pacchierotti, E. (2005). Embodied social interaction for robots. In K. Dautenhahn (Ed.), AISB-05 (pp. 40–45), Hertsfordshire, April 2005.

  • Clynes, D. M. (1997). Sentics: the touch of emotions. Surbiton: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fong, T. W., Nourbakhsh, I., & Dautenhahn, K. (2002). A survey of socially interactive robots: concepts, design, and applications (Tech. Report CMU-RI-TR-02-29). Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, December 2002.

  • Hinds, P. J., Roberts, T. L., & Jones, H. (2004). Whose job is it anyway? A study of human–robot interaction in a collaborative task. Human–Computer Interaction, 19, 151–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulyukin, V. A., & Gharpure, C. (2006). Ergonomics-for-one in a robotic shopping cart for the blind. In HRI ’06: proceeding of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on human–robot interaction (pp. 142–149). New York: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kulyukin, V., Gharpure, C., Nicholson, J., & Osborne, G. (2006). Robot-assisted wayfinding for the visually impaired in structured indoor environments. Autonomous Robots, 21(1), 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesh, N., Rich, C., & Sidner, C. L. (1999). Using plan recognition in human–computer collaboration. In UM ’99: proceedings of the seventh international conference on user modeling, Secaucus, NJ, USA (pp. 23–32). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsunaga, N., Smith, C., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., & Hagita, N. (2005). Robot behavior adaptation for human–robot interaction based on policy gradient reinforcement learning. In IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS2005) (pp. 1594–1601).

  • Pacchierotti, E., Christensen, H. I., & Jensfelt, P. (2005). Human-robot embodied interaction in hallway settings: a pilot user study. In IEEE ROMAN-05 (pp. 164–171), Hertsfordshire, August 2005.

  • Pentland, A. S. (2004). Healthwear: medical technology becomes wearable. Computer, 37(5), 42–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picard, R. (1995) Affective computing (Tech. Report 321). MIT Media Laboratory, Perceptual Computing Section, November 1995.

  • Plutchik, R. (1980). A general psychoevolutionary theory of emotion. In R. Plutchik, H. Kellerman (Eds.), Emotion research, theory, and experience, Vol. 1: theories of emotion (pp. 3–33). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, D., & Amir, E. (2007) Bayesian inverse reinforcement learning. In 20th international joint conference on artificial intelligence (IJCAI’07).

  • Rani, P., & Sarkar, N. (2005). Making robots emotion-sensitive—preliminary experiments and results. In IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication (ROMAN 2005) (pp. 13–15).

  • Rani, P., Sarkar, N., Smith, C. A., & Kirby, L. D. (2004). Anxiety detecting robotic systems—towards implicit human–robot collaboration. Robotica, 22(1), 85–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rani, P., Liu, C., & Sarkar, N. (2006). Affective feedback in closed loop human–robot interaction. In HRI ’06: proceeding of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on human–robot interaction (pp. 335–336). New York: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, N., Pineau, J., & Thrun, S. (2000). Spoken dialogue management using probabilistic reasoning. In ACL ’00: proceedings of the 38th annual meeting on association for computational linguistics (pp. 93–100). Morristown: Association for Computational Linguistics.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Meisner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meisner, E., Isler, V. & Trinkle, J. Controller design for human-robot interaction. Auton Robot 24, 123–134 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-007-9054-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-007-9054-7

Keywords

Navigation