Skip to main content
Log in

Constraints on the emergent universe from recent temperature and Hubble data

  • Research
  • Published:
Astrophysics and Space Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, the emergent universe model (EU) is explored (as per Mukherjee \({\mathit{et\;al.}}\)) in a flat scenario with equation of state \((EoS)\) \(p=B\rho -A\rho ^{\frac{1}{2}}\) (where \(A\) and \(B\) are constants). Here, the temperature function is evaluated in terms of the EoS parameters and redshift under the conditions of balanced particle creation and annihilation. To examine the thermodynamic evolution and find a viable EU model, constraints on its EoS parameters are determined. First, constraints on \(A_{s}\), and \(B\) (where \(A_{s} = \frac{A}{\rho _{eu0}^{\frac{1}{2}}}\) and \(\rho _{eu0}\) is the present energy density) are obtained from the acceptable transition redshift limit \(z_{tr}\) and decoupling temperature limit \(T_{d}\) as \(A_{s}\)\((0.84-1.07)\) and \(B\)\((0.38-0.42)\) for the general EU model. Finally, stricter constraints on \(z_{tr}\) are drawn from recent \(T(z)-z\) and observed Hubble data (OHD). These \(z_{tr}\) and \(T_{d}\) values are then utilized to obtain acceptable limits on \(A_{s}\), and \(B\). On average, the acceptable limits on \(z_{tr}\), \(A_{s}\), and \(B\) are \(0.79\pm 0.03\) (in the 1\(\sigma \) error limit), ≈ \((1.11-1.15)\) and ≈ \((0.41-0.43)\), respectively, for the general EU model. In the \(B=\frac{1}{3}\) model, obtained value \(z_{tr}= 0.71\pm 0.01\) (at the 1\(\sigma \) level). The present values of the EoS parameters are determined, and the viability of the models is examined with plots of the deceleration parameter (\(q\)), equation of state (\(\omega \)) and squared adiabatic sound speed (\(c^{2}_{s}\)) with redshift (\(z\)). The distance modulus (\(\mu \)) of this EU model is compared with the HIIG and Union2.1 data. The models with \(B\) \((= -\frac{1}{3}, 0)\), are not suitable at all according to the present analysis, whereas, the \(B=\frac{1}{3}\) model is quite similar to the observations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author of this paper would like to thank the Vice-Chancellor of Alipurduar University for the necessary research facilities to initiate the work. Author would also like to thank the honorable referee for the constructive suggestions to improve this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Myself: Single author

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prasenjit Thakur.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thakur, P. Constraints on the emergent universe from recent temperature and Hubble data. Astrophys Space Sci 369, 14 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-024-04277-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-024-04277-8

Keywords

Navigation