Skip to main content
Log in

Stigmatization of Consensual Non-Monogamous Partners: Perceived Endorsement of Conservation or Openness to Change Values Vary According to Personal Attitudes

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies have shown that romantic partners in consensual non-monogamous (CNM) relationships are targets of stigmatization. However, little is known about the underlying mechanisms and the conditions under which such stigmatization occurs. In two experimental studies (combined N = 772), we asked participants to read the description of two partners in a relationship (monogamous vs. open relationship vs. polyamorous) and make a series of judgments about those partners. Overall results showed that CNM (vs. monogamous) partners were perceived as less trustworthy and as having more sexual health concerns (Studies 1 and 2), and as being less committed and less sexually satisfied (Study 2). Results from a conditional mediation analysis (Study 2) further showed that participants with negative attitudes toward consensual non-monogamy perceived CNM (vs. monogamous) partners as having less conservation and more openness to change values, which was then associated with more stigmatization. In contrast, participants with positive attitudes toward consensual non-monogamy perceived CNM (vs. monogamous) partners as having more openness to change values, which was then associated with less stigmatization. Taken together, these results extended the literature focused on prejudice, discrimination, and stigmatization of minority groups and highlighted key elements that can be used to buffer stigmatization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Material

All data and syntaxes that support the findings of this study are available on the Open Science Framework (OSF), and all materials are available on request from the corresponding author.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

Download references

Funding

Part of this work was funded by a grant awarded by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia to DLR (Ref.: 2020.00523.CEECIND) and by a grant awarded by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia to GAC (Ref.: PD/BD/150543/2019).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DLR conceived and coordinated the study, performed the measurement and statistical analysis, interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript; GAC helped with statistical analysis and with writing the draft; DL reviewed the draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David L. Rodrigues.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 43 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rodrigues, D.L., Aybar Camposano, G.A. & Lopes, D. Stigmatization of Consensual Non-Monogamous Partners: Perceived Endorsement of Conservation or Openness to Change Values Vary According to Personal Attitudes. Arch Sex Behav 51, 3931–3946 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02368-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02368-7

Keywords

Navigation