Abstract
Sexual intercourse involves two people and many aspects of sexual health are influenced by, if not dependent on, interpersonal processes. Yet, the majority of sexual health research involves the study of individuals. The collection and analysis of dyadic data present additional complexities compared to the study of individuals. The aim of this article was to describe methods for the study of dyadic processes related to sexual health. One-sided designs, including the PLM, involve a single individual reporting on the characteristics of multiple romantic or sexual relationships and the associations of these factors with sexual health outcomes are then estimated. This approach has been used to study how relationship factors, such as if the relationship is serious or casual, are associated with engagement in HIV risk behaviors. Such data can be collected cross-sectionally, longitudinally or through the use of diaries. Two-sided designs, including the actor–partner interdependence model, are used when data are obtained from both members of the dyad. The goal of such approaches is to disentangle intra- and inter-personal effects on outcomes (e.g., the ages of an individual and his partner may influence sexual frequency). In distinguishable datasets, there is some variable that allows the analyst to differentiate between partners within dyads, such as HIV status in a serodiscordant couple. When analyzing data from these dyads, effects can be assigned to specific types of partners. In exchangeable dyadic datasets, no variable is present that distinguishes between couple members across all dyads. Extensions of these approaches are described.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alferes, V. R., & Kenny, D. A. (2009). SPSS programs for the measurement of nonindependence in standard dyadic designs. Behavioral Research Methods, 41, 47–54.
Barron, D. (1992). The analysis of count data: Over-dispersion and autocorrelation. Sociological Methodology, 22, 179–220.
Boone, M. R., Cook, S. H., & Wilson, P. (2013). Substance use and sexual risk behavior in HIV-positive men who have sex with men: An episode-level analysis. AIDS and Behavior, 17, 1883–1887.
Carpenter, K. M., Stoner, S. A., Mikko, A. N., Dhanak, L. P., & Parsons, J. T. (2010). Efficacy of a web-based intervention to reduce sexual risk in men who have sex with men. AIDS and Behavior, 14, 549–557.
CDC. (2012). HIV surveillance report, 2010. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Clerkin, E. M., Newcomb, M. E., & Mustanski, B. (2011). Unpacking the racial disparity in HIV rates: The effect of race on risky sexual behavior among Black young men who have sex with men (YMSM). Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 34, 237–243.
Cook, W. L., & Snyder, D. K. (2005). Analyzing nonindependent outcomes in couple therapy using the actor–partner interdependence model. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 133–141.
Cooper, M. L. (2002). Alcohol use and risky sexual behavior among college students and youth: Evaluating the evidence. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 14, 101–117.
Cooper, M. L. (2010). Toward a person × situation model of sexual risk-taking behaviors: Illuminating the conditional effects of traits across sexual situations and relationship contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 319–341.
Darbes, L. A., & Lewis, M. A. (2005). HIV-specific social support predicts less sexual risk behavior in gay male couples. Health Psychology, 24, 617–622.
Donenberg, G. R., Emerson, E., Bryant, F. B., Wilson, H., & Weber-Shifrin, E. (2001). Understanding AIDS-risk behavior among adolescents in psychiatric care: Links to psychopathology and peer relationships. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 642–653.
Downey, L., Ryan, R., Roffman, R., & Kulich, M. (1995). How could I forgot? Inaccurate memories of sexuall intimate moments. Journal of Sex Research, 32, 177–191.
Gillmore, M., Morrison, D. M., Leigh, B. C., Hoppe, M. J., Gaylord, J., & Rainey, D. T. (2002). Does “high = high risk”? An event-based analysis of the relationship between substance use and unprotected sex among gay and bisexual men. AIDS and Behavior, 6, 361–370.
Goodreau, S. M., Carnegie, N. B., Vittinghoff, E., Lama, J. R., Sanchez, J., Grinsztejn, B., et al. (2012). What drives the US and Peruvian HIV epidemics in men who have sex with men (MSM)? PLoS ONE, 7, e50522.
Gooty, J., & Yammarino, F. J. (2011). Dyads in organizational research: Conceptual issues and multilevel analyses. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 456–483.
Griffin, D. W., & Gonzalez, R. (1995). Correlational analysis of dyad-level data in the exchangeable case. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 430–439.
Grov, C., Golub, S. A., Mustanski, B., & Parsons, J. T. (2010). Sexual compulsivity, state affect, and sexual risk behavior in a daily diary study of gay and bisexual men. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 24, 487–497.
Heagerty, P. J., & Zeger, S. L. (2000). Marginalized multilevel models and likelihood inference (with comments and a rejoinder by the authors). Statistical Science, 15, 1–26.
Hedeker, D., Mermelstein, R. J., & Demirtas, H. (2012). Modeling between-subject and within-subject variances in ecological momentary assessment data using mixed-effects location scale models. Statistics in Medicine, 31, 3328–3336.
Hoppe, M. J., Morrison, D. M., Gillmore, M. R., Beadnell, B., Higa, D. H., & Leigh, B. C. (2008). Agreement of daily diary and retrospective measures of condom use. AIDS and Behavior, 12, 113–117.
Hu, F. B., Goldberg, J., Hedeker, D., Flay, B. R., & Pentz, M. A. (1998). Comparison of population-averaged and subject-specific approaches for analyzing repeated binary outcomes. American Journal of Epidemiology, 147, 694–703.
Hubbard, A. E., Ahern, J., Fleischer, N. L., Van der Laan, M., Lippman, S. A., Jewell, N., et al. (2010). To GEE or not to GEE: Comparing population average and mixed models for estimating the associations between neighborhood risk factors and health. Epidemiology, 21, 467–474.
Judd, C. M., Kenny, D. A., & McClelland, G. H. (2001). Estimating and testing mediation and moderation in within-subject designs. Psychological Methods, 6, 115–134.
Karney, B. R., Hops, H., Redding, C. A., Reis, H. T., Rothman, A. J., & Simpson, J. A. (2010). A framework for incorporating dyads in models of HIV-prevention. AIDS and Behavior, 14, 189–203.
Kenny, D., Bolger, N., & Kashy, D. (2002). Traditional methods for estimating multilevel models. In D. S. Moskowitz & S. L. Hershberger (Eds.), Modeling intraindividual variability with repeated measures data: Methods and applications (pp. 1–21). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kenny, D. A., & Cook, W. (1999). Partner effects in relationship research: Conceptual issues, analytic difficulties, and illustrations. Personal Relationships, 6, 433–448.
Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (1986). Consequences of violating the independence assumption in analysis of variance. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 422–431.
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindsey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 233–265). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
Laurenceau, J. P., & Bolger, N. (2005). Using diary methods to study marital and family processes. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 86–97.
Leigh, B. C. (2002). Alcohol and condom use: A meta-analysis of event-level studies. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 29, 476–482.
Leigh, B. C., Vanslyke, J. G., Hoppe, M. J., Rainey, D. T., Morrison, D. M., & Gillmore, M. R. (2008). Drinking and condom use: Results from an event-based daily diary. AIDS and Behavior, 12, 104–112.
Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata (2nd ed.). College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.
Marshall, A. D., Panuzio, J., Makin-Byrd, K. N., Taft, C. T., & Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (2011). A multilevel examination of interpartner intimate partner violence and psychological aggression reporting concordance. Behavior Therapy, 42, 364–377.
Mitchell, J. W., Harvey, S. M., Champeau, D., & Seal, D. W. (2012). Relationship factors associated with HIV risk among a sample of gay male couples. AIDS and Behavior, 16, 404–411.
Mustanski, B. (2007). The influence of state and trait affect on HIV risk behaviors: A daily diary study of MSM. Health Psychology, 26, 618–626.
Mustanski, B., Newcomb, M. E., & Clerkin, E. M. (2011). Relationship characteristics and sexual risk-taking in young men who have sex with men. Health Psychology, 30, 597–605.
Newcomb, M. E., Clerkin, E. M., & Mustanski, B. (2011). Sensation seeking moderates the effects of alcohol and drug use prior to sex on sexual risk in young men who have sex with men. AIDS and Behavior, 15, 565–575.
Newcomb, M. E., & Mustanski, B. (2013). Racial differences in same-race partnering and the effects of sexual partnership characteristics on HIV risk in MSM: A prospective sexual diary study. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 62, 329–333.
Parsons, J. T., Starks, T. J., Gamarel, K. E., & Grov, C. (2012). Non-monogamy and sexual relationship quality among same-sex male couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 26, 669–677.
Perisse, A. R., Langenberg, P., Hungerford, L., Boulay, M., Charurat, M., Schechter, M., et al. (2010). Egocentric network data provide additional information for characterizing an individual’s HIV risk profile. AIDS, 24, 291–298.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Rodriguez, G., & Goldman, N. (1995). An assessment of estimation procedures for multilevel models with binary responses. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 158, 73–89.
Schroder, K. E., Carey, M. P., & Vanable, P. A. (2003). Methodological challenges in research on sexual risk behavior: II. Accuracy of self-reports. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 26, 104–123.
Selig, J. P., McNamara, K. A., Card, N. A., & Little, T. D. (2008). Techniques for modeling dependency in interchangeable dyads. In N. A. Card, J. P. Selig, & T. D. Little (Eds.), Modeling dyadic and interdependent data in the developmental and behavioral sciences (pp. 191–212). New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
Shiffman, S., Stone, A. A., & Hufford, M. R. (2008). Ecological momentary assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 1–32.
Starks, T. J., Gamarel, K. E., & Johnson, M. O. (2013). Relationship characteristics and HIV transmission risk in same-sex male couples in HIV serodiscordant relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi:10.1007/s10508-013-0216-8.
Sullivan, P. S., Salazar, L., Buchbinder, S., & Sanchez, T. H. (2009). Estimating the proportion of HIV transmissions from main sex partners among men who have sex with men in five US cities. AIDS, 23, 1153–1162.
Sunner, L. E., Walls, C., Blood, E. A., Mehta, C. M., & Shrier, L. A. (2013). Feasibility and utility of momentary sampling of sex events in young couples. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 688–696.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson Education.
Vosburgh, H. W., Mansergh, G., Sullivan, P. S., & Purcell, D. W. (2012). A review of the literature on event-level substance use and sexual risk behavior among men who have sex with men. AIDS and Behavior, 16, 1394–1410.
Weinhardt, L. S., & Carey, M. P. (2000). Does alcohol lead to sexual risk behavior? Findings from event-level research. Annual Review of Sex Research, 11, 125–157.
Zea, M. C., Reisen, C. A., Poppen, P. J., & Bianchi, F. T. (2009). Unprotected anal intercourse among immigrant Latino MSM: The role of characteristics of the person and the sexual encounter. AIDS and Behavior, 13, 700–715.
Acknowledgments
During the preparation of this manuscript, Brian Mustanski was supported as a Principal Investigator on a grant for research on relationships and the health of YMSM from the National Institute of Mental Health (R21MH095413). He was also supported for research on LGBT Health from the William T. Grant Foundation. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Mental Health, the National Institutes of Health, or the William T. Grant Foundation. This article was an output of a meeting on male couples and sexual health co-organized by Drs. Jeffrey Parsons and Brian Mustanski. We thank anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on drafts of the article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix 1: HIV-Risk Assessment for Sexual Partnerships (H-RASP)
Appendix 1: HIV-Risk Assessment for Sexual Partnerships (H-RASP)
Directions/Prompt These next questions will be about vaginal, anal, or oral sex. Vaginal sex refers to penis in vagina; anal sex refers to penis in the anus or butt; and oral sex refers to penis in mouth, or mouth on vagina, or mouth in or around the butt. Remember your answers to these questions will be private. Please try your best to answer each question.
Entry Questions
HRASP_1. In your ENTIRE LIFE, how many females have you had oral, vaginal, or anal sex with? [numerical response]
HRASP_2. In your ENTIRE LIFE, how many males have you had oral or anal sex with? [numerical response]
IF HRASP_1 > 0: HRASP_3. You said you had oral, vaginal, or anal sex with a total of [HRASP_1] females in your ENTIRE LIFE. In the PAST 6 MONTHS, how many females have you had oral, vaginal or anal sex with? [numerical response]
If HRASP_2 > 0: HRASP_4. You said you had oral or anal sex with a total of [HRASP_2] males in your ENTIRE LIFE. In the PAST 6 MONTHS, how many males have you had oral or anal sex with? [numerical response]
Partner-By-Partner Questions
Directions/Prompt When answering the next question think about the PAST 6 MONTHS; the time period between [sixmonthsMONTH] [sixmonthsYEAR] and today.
If HRASP_3 + HRASP_4 > 0: Initials_P1. Enter the initials of the MOST recent sexual partner you had in the PAST 6 MONTHS. If you do not know this partner’s name, pick two letters that will help you remember, like ‘BP’ for ‘the guy at my Birthday Party’.
If HRASP_3 + HRASP_4 > 1: Initials_P2. Please enter the initials of the sexual partner you had before [Initials_P1], within the PAST 6 MONTHS. If you do not know this partner’s name, pick two letters that will help you remember, like ‘BP’ for ‘the guy at my Birthday Party’.
If HRASP_3 + HRASP_4 > 2: Initials_P3. Please enter the initials of the sexual partner you had before [Initials_P1] and [Initials_P2], within the PAST 6 MONTHS. If you do not know this partner’s name, pick two letters that will help you remember, like ‘BP’ for ‘the guy at my Birthday Party’.
Partner 1: PBP_1. Is [Initials_P1] male, female, or transgender?
1, Male | 2, Female | 3, MTF (Male to Female Transgender] | 4, FTM (Female to Male Transgender)
PBP_2. How did you meet [Initials_P1]?
1, You went to the same school/college/university | 2, You met through a phone app | 3, You lived in the same neighborhood | 4, This person was a friend of another friend of yours | 5, You met at a party | 6, You met at a bar | 7, You met on the internet | 8, You met in a park | 9, You met in a bathhouse | 10, You met in some other way
If PBP_2 = 10: PBP_3. Please specify how you met [Initials_P1] [literal response]
PBP_4. What was the HIV status of [Initials_P1]?
1, He/she was HIV positive | 2, He/she was HIV negative | 3, I don’t know his/her HIV status
If PBP_4 = 1 OR 2: PBP_5. How did you find out about [Initials_P1]’s HIV status?
1, He/she told me | 2, I found out through another person | 3, I assumed his/her HIV status | 4, Other
If PBP_5 = 4: PBP_6. Please specify how you found out about [Initials_P1]’s HIV status [literal response]
If PBP_4 = 1 OR 2: PBP_7. How confident are you about [Initials_P1]’s HIV status?
1, Extremely | 2, Somewhat | 3, Not really | 4, Not at all
PBP_8. How would you describe [Initials_P1]’s race or ethnic background?
1, White (non-Hispanic or Latino/a) | 2, Black/African American (not Hispanic or Latino/a) | 3, Hispanic or Latino/a | 4, Asian or Pacific Islander | 5, Native American | 6, Other | 7, Multi-racial
If PBP_8 = 6: PBP_9. You described [Initials_P1]’s race or ethnic background as Other, please specify [literal response]
If PBP_8 = 7: PBP_10. You described [Initials_P1]’s race or ethnic background as Multi-racial, please specify [literal response]
PBP_11. What was your relationship with [Initials_P1]?
1, Serious relationship (boyfriend/girlfriend), someone you dated for awhile and feel very close to | 2, Casually dating but not serious | 3, Sleeping with this person (fuck buddy or booty call) but not dating | 4, One night stand | 5, Stranger or anonymous person
If PBP_11 = 1, 2, OR 3: PBP_12. How long have you been with [Initials_P1]?
1, Less than a month | 2, 1 to 3 months | 3, 4 to 6 months | 4, 7 months to 11 months | 5, 1 to 3 years | 6, Over 3 years
PBP_13. I really wanted my relationship with [Initials_P1] to last.
1, Strongly agree | 2, Agree | 3, Disagree | 4, Strongly disagree
PBP_14. [Initials_P1] was having sex with someone else.
1, Strongly agree | 2, Agree | 3, Disagree | 4, Strongly disagree
PBP_15. I was having sex with someone else.
1, Yes | 2, No
PBP_16. How old was [Initials_P1] when you first started having sex with him/her?
1, He/she was more than 2 years younger than you | 2, He/she was about 1 year younger than you | 3, You were the same age | 4, 1 to 2 years older than you | 5, 3 to 4 years older than you | 6, 5 or more years older than you | 7, I don’t know how old he/she is
PBP_17. Has [Initials_P1] ever hit, slapped, punched, or hurt you?
1, Yes | 2, No
PBP_18. Did [Initials_P1] ever force you to have sex when you didn’t want to? (“Force” includes physical and non-physical pressure, such as pushing you, arguing with you or threatening you in order to have sex).
1, Yes | 2, No
If PBP_18 = 1: PBP_19. Did [Initials_P1] ever force you to have unprotected sex when you didn’t want to?
1, Yes | 2, No
PBP_19. Have you ever hit, slapped, punched, or hurt [Initials_P1] in a physical way?
1, Yes | 2, No
PBP_20. Did you ever force [Initials_P1] to have sex when he/she didn’t want to? (“Force” includes physical and non-physical pressure, such as pushing, arguing or threatening your partner in order to have sex).
1, Yes | 2, No
If PBP_20 = 1: PBP_21. Did you ever force [Initials_P1] to have unprotected sex when he/she didn’t want to?
1, Yes | 2, No
PBP_22. How frequently did you drink alcohol within two hours of having sex with [Initials_P1]?
1, Never | 2, Less than half the time | 3, About half the time | 4, More than half the time | 5, Always
PBP_23. How frequently did you use drugs within two hours before having sex with [name_]?
1, Never | 2, Less than half the time | 3, About half the time | 4, More than half the time | 5, Always
If PBP_1 = 2 OR 4: PBP_24. How many times did you have vaginal sex with [Initials_P1] during the PAST 6 MONTHS? [numerical response]
If PBP_24 > 0: PBP_25. How many times did you have vaginal sex without using a condom with [Initials_P1]? [numerical response]
PBP_26. How many times did you have anal sex with [Initials_P1] during the PAST 6 MONTHS? [numerical response]
If PBP_26 > 0: PBP_27. How many times did you have anal sex without using a condom with [Initials_P1]? [numerical response]
If PBP_27 > 0: PBP_28. How often did you use have sex without a condom during anal sex where you were the top with [Initials_P1]? [numerical response]
If PBP_37 > 0: PBP_29. How often did you have sex without a condom during anal sex where you were the bottom with [Initials_P1]?
PBP_30. How many times did you have oral sex with [Initials_P1] during the PAST 6 MONTHS? [numerical response]
If PBP_30 > 0: PBP_31. How many times did you use a condom during oral sex with [Initials_P1]? [numerical response]
Repeat for Partner 2 and Partner 3 as needed.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mustanski, B., Starks, T. & Newcomb, M.E. Methods for the Design and Analysis of Relationship and Partner Effects on Sexual Health. Arch Sex Behav 43, 21–33 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0215-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0215-9