Abstract
An investigation of the Sexual Self-Consciousness Scale (SSCS) is reported that aims to measure individual variability with regard to the construct of self-consciousness as experienced in sexual situations. The construct relates to the attentional-capacity model of sexual arousal. Sexual self-consciousness may constitute a vulnerability factor for the development of sexual dysfunction. In the present study, men and women with sexual dysfunction and healthy control participants were investigated (N = 282). Principal component analysis and multitrait scaling analysis showed that a two-component, oblimin-rotated solution based on 12 items and explaining 53.7% of the total variance could be well interpreted. The Sexual Embarrassment subscale (Cronbach’s α = .84), the Sexual Self-Focus subscale (α = .79), and the full scale (α = .85) were found to have satisfactory to good internal consistency. Test–retest reliability was satisfactory for the Sexual Embarrassment subscale (r = .84), the Sexual Self-Focus subscale (r = .79), and total score (r = .83). An effect of sex was found on the Sexual Embarrassment subscale, with female participants scoring higher than male participants. Compared with sexually functional participants, sexually dysfunctional participants scored higher on the Sexual Embarrassment and Sexual Self-Focus subscales. Convergent and divergent construct validity was investigated by comparing the associations of SSCS subscales with general self-consciousness and psychological distress scales. The pattern of correlations was interpreted as providing support for the instrument’s construct validity. In conclusion, the SSCS was found to have satisfactory reliability and validity characteristics, and is expected to contribute to the field of sex research and clinical sexology.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arrindell, W. A., & Ettema, H. (1986). SCL-90: Handleiding bij een Multidimensionele Psychopathologie-Indicator. Lisse, NL: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Barlow, D. H. (1986). Causes of sexual dysfunction: The role of anxiety and cognitive interference. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 140–148.
Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. (2007). Jaarboek onderwijs in cijfers 2007 [Yearbook education in numbers 2007]. Voorburg/Heerlen: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Derogatis, L. R., Lipman, R. S., & Covi, L. (1973). SCL-90: An outpatient psychiatric rating scale—preliminary report. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 9, 13–28.
Elliott, A. N., & O’Donohue, W. T. (1997). The effects of anxiety and distraction on sexual arousal in a nonclinical sample of heterosexual women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26, 607–624.
Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M. F., & Buss, A. H. (1975). Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 522–527.
Fichten, C. S., Libman, E., Takefman, J., & Brender, W. (1988). Self-monitoring and self-focus in erectile dysfunction. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 14, 120–128.
Geer, J. H., & Fuhr, R. (1976). Cognitive factors in sexual arousal: The role of distraction. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44, 238–243.
Guadagnoli, E., & Velicer, W. F. (1988). Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 265–275.
Hays, R., & Hayashi, T. (1990). Beyond internal consistency reliability: Rationale and user’s guide for Multitrait Analysis Program on the microcomputer. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 22, 167–175.
Hendriks, T. (1997). Een hypothetisch cognitief verklaringsmodel voor seksuele dysfuncties [A hypothetical cognitive explanatory model of sexual dysfunction]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Hope, D. A., & Heimberg, R. G. (1988). Public and private self-consciousness and social phobia. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 626–639.
Janssen, E., Everaerd, W., Spiering, M., & Janssen, J. (2000). Automatic processes and the appraisal of sexual stimuli: Toward an information processing model of sexual arousal. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 8–23.
Janssen, E., Vorst, H., Finn, P., & Bancroft, J. (2002). The sexual inhibition (SIS) and sexual excitation (SES) scales: II. Predicting psychophysiological response patterns. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 127–132.
Kessler, R. C., McGonagle, K. A., Swartz, M., Blazer, D. G., & Nelson, C. B. (1993). Sex and depression in the National Comorbidity Survey. I: Lifetime prevalence, chronicity and recurrence. Journal of Affective Disorders, 29, 85–96.
Magee, W. J., Eaton, W. W., Wittchen, H. U., McGonagle, K. A., & Kessler, R. C. (1996). Agoraphobia, simple phobia, and social phobia in the National Comorbidity Survey. Archives of General Psychiatry, 53, 159–168.
Masters, W. H., & Johnson, V. E. (1970). Human sexual inadequacy. Boston: Little, Brown.
Meston, C. M. (2006). The effects of state and trait self-focused attention on sexual arousal in sexually functional and dysfunctional women. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 515–532.
Oliver, M. B., & Hyde, J. S. (1993). Gender differences in sexuality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 29–51.
Purnine, D. M., & Carey, M. P. (1998). Age and gender differences in sexual behavior preferences: A follow-up report. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 24, 93–102.
Salemink, E., & van Lankveld, J. J. (2006). The effects of increasing neutral distraction on sexual responding in women with and without sexual problems. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 179–190.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
van den Hout, M. A., & Barlow, D. (2000). Attention, arousal and expectancies in anxiety and sexual disorders. Journal of Affective Disorders, 61, 241–256.
van Lankveld, J. J. D. M., & Grotjohann, Y. (2000). Psychiatric comorbidity in heterosexual couples with sexual dysfunction assessed with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 29, 479–498.
van Lankveld, J. J. D. M., & van den Hout, M. A. (2004). Increasing neutral distraction inhibits genital but not subjective sexual arousal of sexually functional and dysfunctional men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 549–558.
van Lankveld, J. J. D. M., van den Hout, M. A., & Schouten, E. G. (2004). The effects of self-focused attention, performance demand, and dispositional sexual self-consciousness on sexual arousal of sexually functional and dysfunctional men. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 915–935.
Vleeming, R. G., & Engelse, J. A. (1981). Assessment of private and public self-consciousness: A Dutch replication. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 385–389.
Vroege, J. A. (2003). De Vragenlijst voor het signaleren van Seksuele Dysfuncties (VSD) [Questionnaire for the Screening of Sexual Dysfunction] (Vol. 4). Delft, The Netherlands: Eburon.
Williams, J. M. G., Watts, F. N., MacLeod, C. M., & Mathews, A. (1997). Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van Lankveld, J.J.D.M., Geijen, W.E.H. & Sykora, H. The Sexual Self-Consciousness Scale: Psychometric Properties. Arch Sex Behav 37, 925–933 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9253-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9253-5