Notes
For the present purposes, the terms argument scheme and argumentation schemes are considered synonyms. Their use depends on different traditions.
References
Aakhus, M. 2007. Communication as design. Communication Monographs 74(1): 112–117.
Battersby, M., and S. Bailin. 2011. Guidelines for reaching a reasoned judgment. In Conductive argument: An overlooked type of defeasible reasoning, ed. J.A. Blair, and R.H. Johnson, 145–157. London: College Publications.
Govier, T. 1999. The philosophy of argument. Newport News, VA: Vale Press.
Hitchcock, D. 1985. Enthymematic arguments. Informal Logic 7: 83–97.
Rigotti, E., and S. Greco Morasso. 2010. Comparing the argumentum model of topics to other contemporary approaches to argument schemes: The procedural and material components. Argumentation 24(4): 489–512.
Rocci, A. 2008. Modality and its conversational backgrounds in the reconstruction of argumentation. Argumentation 22(2): 165–189.
van Eemeren, F.H. 2010. Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse. Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
van Eemeren, F.H., and B. Garssen (eds.). 2015. Scrutinizing argumentation in practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Greco, S. F. H. van Eemeren, B. Garssen (eds): Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory. Argumentation 31, 213–220 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-016-9397-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-016-9397-3