Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Beyond institutional voids and the middle-income trap: The emerging business angel market in Malaysia

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Emerging economies are characterized by the presence of institutional voids which challenge and constrain the behavior of economic agents. In this paper we report on one set of agents, angel investors, in Malaysia, which investors fear is experiencing a middle-income trap whereby economic growth and new venture formation stalls due to persistent institutional voids. This research addresses this question through interviews with 19 Malaysian business angel investors in 2015, utilizing a mixed-methods approach. Results indicate that business angels in our sample generated strong returns, though they did find it a challenge to invest in and monitor new ventures in a highly uncertain and competitive environment where there is high political uncertainty, weak legal and financial support for investors and SMEs. In order to overcome weak institutional support, business angel investors develop informal institutions by co-investing and networking with family members and government officials. They also conduct careful due diligence before investing and closely monitor their investee companies after investing. This research provides several theory and practice contributions with respect to business-angel investing in emerging economies with weak formal institutional regimes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Accountant Today. 2014. Angel tax incentive to boost innovative and domestic investments. Mar/Apr.

  • Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. 2012. Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. New York: Crown Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agénor, P.-R. 2017. Caught in the middle? The economics of middle-income traps. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(3): 771–791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agénor, P.-R., & Canuto, O. 2014. Access to finance, product innovation and middle-income traps. Policy Research working paper No. 6767, The World Bank, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlstrom, D. 2010. Innovation and growth: How business contributes to society. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3): 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlstrom, D., & Bruton, G. D. 2006. Venture capital in emerging economies: Networks and institutional change. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 30(2): 299–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlstrom, D., & Bruton, G. D. 2010. Rapid institutional shifts and the co-evolution of entrepreneurial firms in transition economies. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 34(3): 531–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Yeh, K. S. 2007. Venture capital in China: Past, present and future. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24(3): 247–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlstrom, D., & Ding, Z. 2014. Entrepreneurship in China: An overview. International Small Business Journal, 32(6): 610–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlstrom, D., Levitas, E., Hitt, M. A., Dacin, M. T., & Zhu, H. 2014. The three faces of China: Strategic alliance partner selection in three ethnic Chinese economies. Journal of World Business, 49(4): 572–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlstrom, D., Young, M. N., Nair, A., & Law, P. 2003. Managing the institutional environment: Challenges for foreign firms in post WTO China. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 68(2): 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiyar, S., Duval, R., Puy, D., Wu, Y., & Zhang, L. 2013. Growth slowdowns and the middle-income trap. IMF working paper no. 13/71, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.

  • Amaeshi, K., Adegbite, E., & Rajwani, T. 2016. Corporate social responsibility in challenging and non-enabling institutional contexts: Do institutional voids matter?. Journal of Business Ethics, 134: 135–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amatucci, F. M., & Sohl, J. E. 2006. Business angels: Investment, processes, outcomes, and current trends. In A. Zacharakis, & S. Spinelli (Eds.). Entrepreneurship: The engine of growth, Vol. 2: 87–107. Wesport: Greenwood.

  • Anheier, H. K. 2014. Institutional voids and the role of civil society: The case of global finance. Global Policy, 5: 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asian Development Bank. 2011. Asia 2050: Realizing the Asian century. Manila: Asian Development Bank.

  • Asian Development Bank. 2014. Asian development outlook 2014: Fiscal policy for inclusive growth. Manila: Asian Development Bank

  • Asian Development Bank. 2016. Asian development outlook 2016: Asia’s potential growth. Manila: Asian Development Bank.

  • Avdeitchikova, S. 2008. On the structure of the informal venture capital market in Sweden: Developing investment roles. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 10: 55–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avdeitchikova, S., Landstrom, H., & Mansson, N. 2008. What do we mean when we talk about business angels? Some reflections on definitions and sampling. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 10: 371–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettis, R. A., Gambardella, A., Helfat, C., & Mitchell, W. 2014. Theory in strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 35: 1411–1413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, G. D., & Ahlstrom, D. 2003. An institutional view of China’s venture capital industry: Explaining the differences between China and the West. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2): 233–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Obloj, K. 2008. Entrepreneurship in emerging economies: Where are we today and where should the research go in the future. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 32(1): 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Puky, T. 2009. Institutional differences and the development of entrepreneurial ventures: A comparison of the venture capital industries in Latin America and Asia. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(5): 762–778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Singh, K. 2002. The impact of the institutional environment on the venture capital industry in Singapore. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 4(3): 197–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Yeh, K. S. 2004. Understanding venture capital in East Asia: The impact of institutions on the industry today and tomorrow. Journal of World Business, 39(1): 72–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, G. D., Dattani, M., Fung, M., Chow, C., & Ahlstrom, D. 1999. Private equity in China: Differences and similarities with the Western model. Journal of Private Equity, 2(2): 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, G. D., Fried, V. H., & Manigart, S. 2005. Institutional influences on the worldwide expansion of venture capital. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 29: 737–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, F. 2012. Is there a “middle-income trap”? Theories, experiences and relevance to China. China & World Economy, 20: 49–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., Chang, A. Y., & Bruton, G. D. 2017. Microfinance: Where are we today and where should the research go in the future?. International Small Business Journal, forthcoming.

  • Cherif, R. & Hasanov, F. 2015. The leap of the tiger: How Malaysia can escape the middle-income trap. IMF working paper no. 15/131, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.

  • Coviello, N. I., & Jones, M. V. 2004. Methodological issues in international entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing, 19: 485–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. 2014. A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

  • Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. 2007. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

  • Denrell, J., Fang, C., & Winter, S. G. 2003. The economics of strategic opportunity. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 977–990.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. 1991. Introduction. In W. W. Powell, & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis: 1–38. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding, Z., Sun, S. L., & Au, K. 2014. Angel investors’ selection criteria: A comparative institutional perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(3): 705–731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichengreen, B., Park, D., & Shin, K. 2013. Growth slowdowns redux: new evidence on the middle-income trap. NBER working paper no. 18673, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge.

  • Farrell, E., Howorth, C., & Wright, M. 2008. A review of sampling and definitional issues in informal venture capital research. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 10: 331–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felipe, J., Abdon, A., & Kumar, U. 2012. Tracking the middle-income trap: What is it, who is in it, and why?. Working paper no. 715, Levy Economics Institute, Annandale-on-Hudson.

  • Gao, C., Zuzul, T., Jones, G., & Khanna, T. 2017. Overcoming institutional voids: A reputation-based view of long run survival. Working paper no. 17–060, Harvard Business School, Boston.

  • Gill, I. S., Kharas, H., & Bhattasali, D. 2007. An East Asian renaissance: Ideas for economic growth. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

  • Gomez, E. T. 2013. The new economic policy in Malaysia: Affirmative action, ethnic inequalities and social justice. Singapore: NUS Press.

  • Gompers, P. A., & Lerner, J. 2001. The money of invention: How venture capital creates new wealth. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

  • Gorman, M., & Sahlman, W. A. 1989. What do venture capitalists do?. Journal of Business Venturing, 4: 231–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, B. 2011. Middle-income trap. In R. Nallari, S. Yusuf, B. Griffith & R. Battacharya (Eds.). Frontiers in development policy: A primer on emerging issues. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

  • Groh, A., Liechtenstein, H., & Lieser, K. 2013. The venture capital and private equity country attractiveness index 2013 annual. Barcelona: IESE Business School, University of Navarra.

  • Groh, A., Liechtenstein, H., Lieser, K., & Biesinger, M. 2015. The venture capital and private equity country attractiveness index 2015 annual. Barcelona: IESE Business School, University of Navarra.

  • Harrison, R. T. 2016. Afterword. In J. Y. Lo (Ed.). Angel financing in Asia Pacific: A guidebook for investors and entrepreneurs: 489–491. Bingley: Emerald.

  • Harrison, R. T. 2017. The internationalization of business angel investment activity: A review and research agenda. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 19: 119–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R. T., & Mason, C. M. 2000. The role of the public sector in the development of a regional venture capital industry. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 2(4): 243–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R. T., & Mason, C. M. 2008. Sampling and data collection in business angel research. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 10: 305–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henisz, W. J., Dorobantu, S., & Nartey, L. J. 2014. Spinning gold: The financial returns to stakeholder engagement. Strategic Management Journal, 35: 1727–1748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindle, K., & Lee, L. 2002. An exploratory investigation of informal venture capitalists in Singapore. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 4: 169–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskisson, R. E., Eden, L., Chung, M. L., & Wright, M. 2000. Strategy in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 249–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurmerinta-Peltomaki, L., & Nummela, N. 2006. Mixed methods in international business research: A value-added perspective. Management International Review, 46: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, P. L., & Silverman, B. S. 2002. The new insitiutionalism in strategic management. Kidlington: Elsevier.

  • Jack, G., Zhu, Y., Barney, J., Brannen, M. Y., Prichard, C., Singh, K., & Whetton, D. 2013. Refining, reinforcing and reimagining universal and indigenous theory development in international management. Journal of Management Inquiry, 22(2): 148–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jankowska, A., Nagengast, A., & Perea, J. R. 2012. The product space and the middle income trap: Comparing Asian and Latin American experiences. Development Centre working paper no. 311, OECD, Paris.

  • Kelly, P. 2007. Business angel research: The road traveled and the journey ahead. In H. Landstrom (Ed.). Handbook of research on venture capital: 315–331. Northampton: Edward Elgar.

  • Khanna, T. 2014. Contextual intelligence. Harvard Business review, 75(4): 58–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. 2010. Winning in emerging markets: A road map for strategy and execution. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

  • Khanna, T., & Rivkin, J. 2001. Estimating the performance effects of business groups in emerging markets. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 45–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kharas, H., & Kohli, H. 2011. What is the middle income trap, why do countries fall into it, and how can it be avoided?. Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, 3(3): 281–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutsuna, K., & Harada, N. 2004. Small business owner-managers as latent informal investors in Japan: Evidence from a country with a bank-based financial system. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 6: 283–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landstrom, H., & Mason, C. 2016. Handbook of research on business angels. Northampton: Edward Elgar.

  • Law, S. H., & Singh, N. 2014. Does too much finance harm economic growth?. Journal of Banking and Finance, 41: 36–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. 2013. Schumpeterian analysis of economic catch-up: knowledge, path-creation and the middle-income trap. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Lerner, J. 2009. Boulevard of broken dreams. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Liu, M. M., Wang, J., & Chen, S. 2016. Angel investing in China. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.

  • Liu, X., Serger, S. S., Tagscherer, U., & Chang, A. Y. 2017. Beyond catch-up—Can a new innovation policy help China overcome the middle income trap?. Science and Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scw092.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Chen, Y. J., & Wang, L. C. 2017. Family business, innovation and organizational slack in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 34(1): 193–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo, J. Y. 2016a. Angel financing in Asia Pacific: A guidebook for investors and entrepreneurs. Bingley: Emerald.

  • Lo, J. Y. 2016b. China. In J. Y. Lo (Ed.). Angel financing in Asia Pacific: A guidebook for investors and entrepreneurs: 45–80. Bingley: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, X. R., & Chung, C. N. 2013. Filling or abusing the institutional void? Ownership and control of public family businesses in an emerging market. Organization Science, 24: 591–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, J., & Marti, I. 2009. Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Venturing, 24: 419–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, J., Marti, I., & Ventresca, M. J. 2012. Building inclusive markets in rural Bangladesh: How intermediaries work institutional voids. Academy of Management Journal, 55: 819–850.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malaysian Economy in Figures. 2017. Developing Malaysia into a knowledge-based economy. Kuala Lumpur: Economic Planning Unit.

  • Mani, S. 2004. Financing of innovation: A survey of various institutional mechanisms in Malaysia and Singapore. Journal of Technology Innovation, 12(2): 185–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manikandan, K. S., & Ramachandran, J. 2015. Beyond institutional voids: Business groups, incomplete markets, and organizational form. Strategic Management Journal, 36: 598–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquis, C., & Raynard, M. 2015. Institutional strategies in emerging markets. Academy of Management Annals, 9: 291–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, C. M., & Harrison, R. T. 1997. Business angel networks and the development of the informal venture capital market in the UK: Is there still a role for the public sector?. Small Business Economics, 9: 111–123.

  • Mason, C. M., & Harrison, R. T. 2002. Is it worth it? The rates of return from informal venture capital investments. Journal of Business Venturing, 4: 211–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, C. M., & Harrison, R. T. 2008. Measuring business angel investment activity in the United Kingdom: A review of potential data sources. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 10: 309–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, J., & Lui, M. 2016. Angels without borders: Trends and policies shaping angel investment worldwide. Singapore: World Scientific.

  • McCloskey, D. M. 2013. Tunzelmann, Schumpeter, and the hockey stick. Research Policy, 42: 1706–1715.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. E. 2001. Institutions, transaction costs and entry mode choice in Eastern Europe. Journal of International Business Studies, 32: 357–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. E., Estrin, S., Bhaumik, S. K., & Peng, M. W. 2009. Institutions, resources, and entry strategies in emerging economies. Strategic Management Journal, 30: 61–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. E., & Peng, M. W. 2016. Theoretical foundations of emerging economy business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 47: 2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. 1984. Qualitative data analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage.

  • Morrissette, S. G. 2007. A profile of angel investors. Journal of Private Equity, Summer: 52–66.

  • North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Paul, S., Whittam, G., & Wyper, J. 2007. Towards a model of the business angel investment process. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 9: 117–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W. 2003. Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28: 275–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W., & Heath, P. 1996. The growth of the firm in planned economies in transition: Institutions, organizations, and strategic choice. Academy of Management Review, 21: 492–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W., Sun, S. L., Pinkham, B., & Chen, H. 2009. The institution-based view as a third leg for a strategy tripod. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23: 63–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Carraher, S. M., & Shi, W. 2017. An institution-based view of global IPR History. Journal of International Business Studies. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-016-0061-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preqin. 2011. Preqin special report: Asia-Pacific private equity—September 2011. New York: Preqin.

  • Puffer, S. M., McCarthy, D. J., & Boisot, M. 2010. Entrepreneurship in Russia and China: The impact of formal institutional voids. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 34: 441–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramamurti, R. 2000. A multilevel model of privatization in emerging economies. Academy of Management Review, 25: 525–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheela, W. 2006. Knowledge transfer: The development of venture capital in South East Asia. In J. Butler, A. Lockett, & D. Ucbasaran (Eds.). Venture capital and the changing world of entrepreneurship: 75–90. Greenwich: Information Age.

  • Scheela, W. 2014. Venture capital in Asia: Investing in emerging countries. New York: Business Expert.

  • Scheela, W., & Isidro, E. S. 2008. Private equity investing in the Philippines: Business angels vs. venture capitalists. Journal of Private Equity, 11: 90–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheela, W. J., & Isidro, E. S. 2009. Business angel investing in an emerging Asian economy. Journal of Private Equity, 12: 44–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheela, W., Isidro, E. S., Jittrapanun, T., & Nguyen, T. T. 2015. Formal and informal venture capital investing in emerging economies in Southeast Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(3): 597–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheela, W., & Jittrapanun, T. 2008. The impact of the lack of institutional development on the venture capital industry in Thailand. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 16: 189–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheela, W., & Jittrapanun, T. 2012. Do institutions matter for business angel investors in emerging Asian markets?. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 14: 289–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheela, W., & Nguyen, V. D. 2004. Venture capital in a transition economy: The case of Vietnam. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 6: 333–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Science and Technology Information Center. 2017. Malaysian science and technology indicators report 2017. Putrajaya: Science and Technology Information Center.

  • Scott, W. R. 2013. Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

  • Silvestre, B. S. 2015. Sustainable supply chain management in emerging economies: Environmental turbulence, institutional voids and sustainability trajectories. International Journal of Production Economics, 167: 156–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smangs, M. 2006. The nature of the business group: A social network perspective. Organization, 13: 889–909.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohl, J. 2003. The US angel and venture capital market: Recent trends and developments. Journal of Private Equity, 6: 7–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spigel, B. 2015. The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spigel, B., & Harrison, R. T. 2016. Towards a theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stam, E. 2015. Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: A sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, 23: 759–769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, U., Uhlaner, L. M., & Stride, C. 2015. Institutions and social entrepreneurship: The role of institutional voids, institutional support, and institutional configurations. Journal of International Business Studies, 46: 208–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, Z., Ahlstrom, D., & Cheng, D. 2013. Knowledge creation capability, absorptive capacity, and product innovativeness. R&D Management, 43(5): 473–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. 1998. Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

  • Tashiro, Y. 1999. Business angels in Japan. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 1: 259–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tendulkar, S. D., & Bhavani, T. A. 1997. Policy on modern small scale industries: A case of government failure. Indian Economic Review, 32: 39–64.

  • Wang, J., & Chen, S. 2016. China. In J. May, & M. M. Liu (Eds.). Angels without borders: Trends and policies shaping angel investment worldwide: 139–150. Singapore: World Scientific.

  • Wang, J., Tan, Y., & Liu, M. 2016. Business angels in China: Characteristics, policies and international comparison. In H. Landstrom, & C. Mason (Eds.). Handbook of research on business angels: 201–232. Northampton: Edward Elgar.

  • Wang, L. C., Ahlstrom, D., Nair, A., & Hang, R. Z. 2008. Creating globally competitive and innovative products: China’s next Olympic challenge. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 73(3): 4–15.

  • Wetzel, W. E. 1983. Angels and informal risk capital. Sloan Management Review, summer: 23–34.

  • Wong, C. Y., & Enoch, C. 2011. An evolutionary perspective on development of venture capital industries. Malaysian Journal of Science and Technology Studies, 7: 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, P. K., & Ho, Y. P. 2007. Characteristics and determinants of informal investment in Singapore. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 9: 43–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woo, W. T. 2009. Getting Malaysia out of the middle-income trap. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1534454. Accessed June 28, 2017.

  • World Bank. 2014. Global financial development report: Financial inclusion. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

  • World Development Report. 2002. Building institutions for markets. Washington, DC: Oxford University Press.

  • Wright, M., Pruthi, S., & Lockett, A. 2005. International venture capital research: From cross-country comparisons to crossing borders. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7: 135–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, L., & North, D. 2012. Institutional transition and the financing of high-tech SMEs in China: A longitudinal perspective. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 14: 269–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, L., & Ritchie, B. 2011. Informal investor investing and network in China: An exploratory study. Journal of Private Equity, 14: 72–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. 2013. Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

  • Young, M. N., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., & Bruton, G. D. 2003. Principal-principal agency. Web Journal of Chinese Management Review, 6(1): 18–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. N., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Jiang, Y. 2008. Corporate governance in emerging economies: A review of the principal-principal perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1): 196–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yusuf, S., & Nabeshima, K. 2009. Can Malaysia escape the middle-income trap? A strategy for Penang. Policy Research working paper no. 4971, The World Bank, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoogah, D., Peng, M. W., & Woldu, H. 2015. Institutions, resources, and organizational effectiveness in Africa. Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(1): 7–31.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Business School and University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

    Richard Harrison

  2. College of Business, Bemidji State University, 1500 Birchmont Avenue, Bemidji, MN, 56601, USA

    William Scheela

  3. Innovation & Business Development and University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    P. C. Lai

  4. Malaysian Business Angel Network, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    Sivapalan Vivekarajah

Authors
  1. Richard Harrison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. William Scheela
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. C. Lai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sivapalan Vivekarajah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William Scheela.

Ethics declarations

Funding

Research for this paper was sponsored by the Malaysian Business Angels Network (MBAN) and Technopreneurs Association of Malaysia (TeAM) and funded by the Cradle Fund Sdn Bhd, all located in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harrison, R., Scheela, W., Lai, P.C. et al. Beyond institutional voids and the middle-income trap: The emerging business angel market in Malaysia. Asia Pac J Manag 35, 965–991 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-017-9535-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-017-9535-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation