Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Understanding Clinicians’ Diagnostic Practices: Attitudes Toward the Utility of Diagnosis and Standardized Diagnostic Tools

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data on clinician diagnostic practices suggest they may not align with evidence-based guidelines. To better understand these practices, a multidisciplinary survey of 1,678 child clinicians examined attitudes toward the utility of diagnosis and standardized diagnostic tools. Psychiatrists were more likely than other disciplines to value diagnosis, whereas psychologists were more likely than others to value standardized diagnostic tools. Private practitioners held less positive views in both domains than other practitioners. Both attitude scales predicted self-reported diagnostic practices, although views of diagnosis utility were more associated with diagnosing in general, whereas views of diagnostic tools were more predictive of standardized tool use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We thank an anonymous reviewer for this suggestion.

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (Text Revision) (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Angold, A., & Fisher, P. W. (1999). Interviewer-based interviews. In D. Shaffer, C. P. Lucas, & J. E. Richters (Eds.), Diagnostic assessment in child and adolescent psychopathology (pp. 34–64). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(4), 471–499.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Basco, M. R., Bostic, J. Q., Davies, D., Rush, A. J., Witte, B., Hendrickse, W., et al. (2000). Methods to improve diagnostic accuracy in a community mental health setting. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157(10), 1599–1605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cashel, M. L. (2002). Child and adolescent psychological assessment: Current clinical practices and the impact of managed care. Professional Psychology Research and Practice, 33(5), 446–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chorpita, B. F., & Donkervoet, C. (2005). Implementation of the Felix consent decree in Hawaii: The impact of policy and practice development efforts on service delivery. In R.G. Steele & M.C. Roberts (Eds.), Handbook of mental health services for children, adolescents, and families (pp. 317–332). New York, US: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazer, P., Westhuis, D., Daley, J. G., & Phillips, I. (2009). How clinical social workers are using the DSM-IV: A national study. Social Work in Mental Health, 7(4), 325–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garb, H. N. (1998). Studying the clinician: Judgment research and psychological assessment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Garb, H. N. (2005). Clinical judgment and decision making. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1(1), 67–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garland, A. F., Kruse, M., & Aarons, G. A. (2003). Clinicians and outcome measurement: What’s the use? The Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research, 30(4), 393–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbody, S. M., House, A. O., & Sheldon, T. A. (2002). Psychiatrists in the UK do not use outcomes measures: National survey. British Journal of Psychiatry, 180(2), 101–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Godin, G., & Kok, G. (1996). The theory of planned behavior: A review of its applications to health-related behaviors. American Journal of Health Promotion, 11, 87–98.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, D. R., & Ogles, B. M. (2007). Why some clinicians use outcome measures and others do not. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 34(3), 283–291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, K. M., Cook, J. R., & Jensen-Doss, A. (2009). Do noncontingent incentives increase survey response rates among mental health providers? A randomized trial comparison. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 36, 343–348.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hunsley, J., & Mash, E. J. (2005). Introduction to the special section on developing guidelines for the evidence-based assessment (EBA) of adult disorders. Psychological Assessment, 17(3), 251–255.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jampala, V. C., Zimmerman, M., Sierles, F. S., & Taylor, M. A. (1992). Consumers’ attitudes toward DSM-III and DSM-III—R: A 1989 survey of psychiatric educators, researchers, practitioners, and senior residents. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 33(3), 180–185.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A. L., & Weisz, J. R. (2002). Assessing match and mismatch between practitioner-generated and standardized interview-generated diagnoses for clinic-referred children and adolescents. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70(1), 158–168.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen-Doss, A., & Hawley, K. M. (2010). Understanding barriers to evidence-based assessment: Clinician attitudes toward standardized assessment tools. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 39, 885–896.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen-Doss, A., Hawley, K. M., Lopez, M., & Osterberg, L. D. (2009). Using evidence-based treatments: The experiences of youth providers working under a mandate. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40(4), 417–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen-Doss, A., & Weisz, J. R. (2008). Diagnostic agreement predicts treatment process and outcomes in youth mental health clinics. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76(5), 711–722.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, D. N., Dougherty, L. R., & Olino, T. M. (2005). Toward guidelines for evidence-based assessment of depression in children and adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34(3), 412–432.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, P. (1986). A handbook of test construction. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutchins, H., & Kirk, S. A. (1988). The business of diagnosis: DSM-III and clinical social work. Social Work, 33(3), 215–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, J., Pomerantz, A. M., & Pettibone, J. C. (2007). The influence of payment method on psychologists’ diagonistic decisions: Expanding the range of presenting problems. Ethics & Behavior, 17(1), 83–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mash, E. J., & Hunsley, J. (2005). Evidence-based assessment of child and adolescent disorders: Issues and challenges. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34(3), 362–379.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, R. J., & Frick, P. J. (2005). Evidence-based assessment of conduct problems in children and adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34(3), 477–505.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mead, M. A., Hoenshil, T. H., & Singh, K. (1997). How the DSM system is used by clinical counselors: A national study. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 19, 383–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L. S., Bergstrom, D. A., Cross, H. J., & Grube, J. W. (1981). Opinions and use of the DSM system by practicing psychologists. Professional Psychology, 12, 385–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelham, W. E., Jr., Fabiano, G. A., & Massetti, G. M. (2005). Evidence-based assessment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34(3), 449–476.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pogge, D. L., Wayland-Smith, D., Zaccario, M., Borgaro, S., Stokes, J., & Harvey, P. D. (2001). Diagnosis of manic episodes in adolescent inpatients: Structured diagnostic procedures compared to clinical chart diagnoses. Psychiatry Research, 101(1), 47–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pomerantz, A. M., & Segrist, D. J. (2006). The influence of payment method on psychologists’ diagnostic decisions regarding minimally impaired clients. Ethics & Behavior, 16(3), 253–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rettew, D. C., Lynch, A. D., Achenbach, T. M., Dumenci, L., & Ivanova, M. Y. (2009). Meta-analyses of agreement between diagnoses made from clinical evaluations and standardized diagnostic interviews. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 18(3), 169–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Setterberg, S. R., Ernst, M., Rao, U., & Campbell, M. (1991). Child psychiatrists’ views of DSM-III—R: A survey of usage and opinions. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 30(4), 652–658.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, W. K., & Ollendick, T. H. (2005). Evidence-based assessment of anxiety and its disorders in children and adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34(3), 380–411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisz, J. R., & Addis, M. E. (2006). The research-practice tango and other choreographic challenges: Using and testing evidence-based psychotherapies in clinical care settings. In C.D. Goodheart, A.E. Kazdin, & R.J. Sternberg (Eds.), Evidence-based psychotherapy: Where practice and research meet (pp. 179–206). Washington, DC US: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Youngstrom, E. A., Findling, R. L., Youngstrom, J. K., & Calabrese, J. R. (2005). Toward an evidence-based assessment of pediatric bipolar disorder. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34(3), 433–448.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Miami, PO Box 248185, Coral Gables, FL, 33124-0751, USA

    Amanda Jensen-Doss

  2. University of Missouri, Columbia, USA

    Kristin M. Hawley

Authors
  1. Amanda Jensen-Doss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kristin M. Hawley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amanda Jensen-Doss.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jensen-Doss, A., Hawley, K.M. Understanding Clinicians’ Diagnostic Practices: Attitudes Toward the Utility of Diagnosis and Standardized Diagnostic Tools. Adm Policy Ment Health 38, 476–485 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-011-0334-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-011-0334-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation