Abstract
Staphylococcus epidermidis is a major nosocomial pathogen associated with infections of indwelling medical devices. One important virulence factor of these organisms is their ability to adhere to devices and form biofilms. In this study, we evaluated the effect of the ica operon on cell surface hydrophobicity, thermodynamics of adhesion, and biofilm formation for seven S. epidermidis strains. The surface free energy parameters of the bacterial cell surface and the substratum were determined by contact angle measurement. Biofilm formation was assayed using crystal violet staining. Results showed that ica-positive strains demonstrated a higher hydrophobic characteristic than ica-negative strains, suggesting that the ica-operon seems to determine the cell surface hydrophobicity of S. epidermidis. Interaction of ica-positive strains with a tissue-culture treated polystyrene surface was energetically favourable (ΔGTot < 0), in contrast to ica-negative strains (ΔGTot > 0). The interfacial free energy of aggregation of S. epidermidis was lower for ica-positive than for ica-negative strains. Our study suggests that, in addition to biofilm formation, adhesion and aggregation of clinical S. epidermidis is stimulated in ica-positive strains by influencing the thermodynamics of interaction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Busscher HJ, van der Mei HC (2012) How do bacteria know they are on a surface and regulate their response to an adhering state? PLoS Pathog. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1002440
Cafiso V, Bertuccio T, Santagati M et al (2004) Presence of the ica operon in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis and its role in biofilm production. Clin Microbiol Infect 10:1081–1088. doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.01024.x
Christensen GD, Simpson WA, Younger JA et al (1985) Adherence of coagulase negative Staphylococci to plastic tissue cultures: a quantitative model for the adherence of staphylococci to medical devices. J Clin Microbiol 22:996–1006
Cramton SE, Gerke C, Schnell NF et al (1999) The intercellular adhesion (ica) locus is present in Staphylococcus aureus and is required for biofilm formation. Infect Immun 67:5427–5433
de Lobato EMC (2004) Determination of surface free energies and aspect ratio of talc. Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, pp 67–127
Doyle RJ (2000) Contribution of the hydrophobic effect to microbial infection. Microbes Infect 2:391–400. doi:10.1016/S1286-4579(00)00328-2
Duncan-Hewitt WC (1990) Nature of the hydrophobic effect. In: Doyle RJ, Rosenberg M (eds) Microbial cell surface hydrophobicity. ASM Press, Washington, DC, pp 39–73
Dunne WM, Dunne WM (2002) Bacterial adhesion: seen any good bio lms lately? Society 15:155–166. doi:10.1128/CMR.15.2.155
Gara JPO, Humphreys H (2001) Staphylococcus epidermidis bio ® lms: importance and implications. Society 50:582–587. doi:10.1099/0022-1317-50-7-582
Gómez-Suárez C, Busscher HJ, Van Der Mei HC (2001) Analysis of bacterial detachment from substratum surfaces by the passage of air-liquid interfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:2531–2537. doi:10.1128/AEM.67.6.2531-2537.2001
Gottenbos B, Van Der Mei HC, Busscher HJ (2000) Initial adhesion and surface growth of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa on biomedical polymers. J Biomed Mater Res 50:208–214
Harapanahalli AK, Chen Y, Li J et al (2015) Influence of adhesion force on icaA and cidA gene expression and production of matrix components in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol. doi:10.1128/AEM.04178-14
Hizal F, Choi C-H, Busscher HJ, van der Mei HC (2016) Staphylococcal adhesion, detachment and transmission on nanopillared Si surfaces. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. doi:10.1021/acsami.6b09437
Idoui T (2014) Probiotic properties of Lactobacillus strains isolated from gizzard of local poultry. Iran J Microbiol 6:120–126
Ista LK, Callow ME, Finlay JA et al (2004) Effect of substratum surface chemistry and surface energy on attachment of marine bacteria and algal spores. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:4151–4157. doi:10.1128/AEM.70.7.4151-4157.2004
Katsikogianni M, Missirlis YF (2004) Concise review of mechanisms of bacterial adhesion to biomaterials and of techniques used in estimating bacteria–material interactions—True Open Access. MEu rKopatesaink oCgeiallnsn ain adn dM Ya.tFe.r iMaliss 8:37–57
Katsikogianni M, Spiliopoulou I, Dowling DP, Missirlis YF (2006) Adhesion of slime producing Staphylococcus epidermidis strains to PVC and diamond-like carbon/silver/fluorinated coatings. J Mater Sci Mater Med. doi:10.1007/s10856-006-9678-8
Kragh KN, Hutchison JB, Melaugh G et al (2016) Role of multicellular aggregates in biofilm formation. MBio 7:1–11. doi:10.1128/mBio00237-16
Krasowska A, Sigler K (2014) How microorganisms use hydrophobicity and what does this mean for human needs? Front Cell Infect Microbiol 4:112. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2014.00112
Lichtenberg D, Rosenberg M, Scharfman N, Ofek I (1985) A kinetic approach to bacterial adherence to hydrocarbons. J Microbiol Methods 4:141–146. doi:10.1016/0167-7012(85)90029-6
Mack D, Davies AP, Harris LG, et al (2013) Staphylococcus epidermidis in biomaterial-associated infections. In: Biomaterials Associated Infection: Immunological Aspects and Antimicrobial Strategies
Malik A, Sakamoto M, Hanazaki S et al (2003) Coaggregation among nonfloculating bacteria isolated from activated sludge. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:6056–6063. doi:10.1128/AEM.69.10.6056
McConoughey SJ, Howlin R, Granger JF et al (2014) Biofilms in periprosthetic orthopedic infections. Future Microbiol 9:987–1007. doi:10.2217/fmb.14.64
Namvar AE, Bastarahang S, Abbasi N et al (2014) Clinical characteristics of Staphylococcus epidermidis: a systematic review. GMS Hyg Infect Control 9(3):23. doi:10.3205/dgkh000243
Nuryastuti T, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ et al (2008) recA mediated spontaneous deletions of the icaADBC operon of clinical Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates: a new mechanism of phenotypic variations. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, Int J Gen Mol Microbiol 94:317–328. doi:10.1007/s10482-008-9249-8
O’Gara JP (2007) ica and beyond: biofilm mechanisms and regulation in Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus. FEMS Microbiol Lett 270:179–188. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00688.x
O’Toole GA (2011) Microtiter dish biofilm formation assay. J Vis Exp 10–11:e2437. doi:10.3791/2437
Oliveira R, Azeredo J, Teixeira P, Fonseca A (2001) The role of hydrophobicity in bacterial adhesion. In: Gillbert P, Allson D, Brading M, Verran J, Walker J (eds). Biofilm community interaction: change or necessity? Bioline, Cardiff UK, pp. 11–22
Otto M (2009) Staphylococcus epidermidis—the’accidental’pathogen. Nat Rev Microbiol 7:555–567. doi:10.1038/nrmicro2182.Staphylococcus
Ramalingam B, Sekar R, Boxall JB, Biggs CA (2013) Aggregation and biofilm formation of bacteria isolated from domestic drinking water. Water Sci Technol Water Supply 13:1016–1023. doi:10.2166/ws.2013.115
Reid G, Schwarz-Faulkner S, McGroarty JA, Bruce AW (1990) Bacterial aggregation in relation to peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 10:21–24
Renata Arciola C, Campoccia D, Ravaioli S et al (2015) Polysaccharide intercellular adhesin in biofilm: structural and regulatory aspects. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2015.00007
Renner LD, Weibel DB (2011) Physicochemical regulation of biofilm formation. MRS Bull 36:347–355. doi:10.1557/mrs.2011.65.Physicochemical
Rickard AH, Gilbert P, High NJ et al (2003) Bacterial coaggregation: an integral process in the development of multi-species biofilms. Trends Microbiol 11:94–100. doi:10.1016/S0966-842X(02)00034-3
Rohde H, Frankenberger S, Zähringer U, Mack D (2010) Structure, function and contribution of polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA) to Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation and pathogenesis of biomaterial-associated infections. Eur J Cell Biol 89:103–111. doi:10.1016/j.ejcb.2009.10.005
Sadovskaya I, Vinogradov E, Flahaut S et al (2005) Extracellular carbohydrate-containing polymers of a model biofilm-produring strain, Staphylococcus epidermidis RP62A. Infect Immun 73:3007–3017. doi:10.1128/IAI.73.5.3007-3017.2005
Sinde E, Carballo J (2000) Attachment of Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes to stainless steel, rubber and polytetrafluorethylene: the influence of free energy and the effect of commercial sanitizers. Food Microbiol 17:439–447
Sousa C, Teixeira P, Oliveira R (2009) Influence of surface properties on the adhesion of Staphylococcus epidermidis to acrylic and silicone. Int J Biomater 2009:1–9. doi:10.1155/2009/718017
Swartjes JJTM, Das T, Sharifi S et al (2013) A functional DNase I coating to prevent adhesion of bacteria and the formation of biofilm. Adv Funct Mater 23:2843–2849. doi:10.1002/adfm.201202927
Tande AJ, Patel R (2014) Prosthetic joint infection. Clin Microbiol Rev 27:302–345. doi:10.1128/CMR.00111-13
Teixeira P, Lopes Z, Azeredo J et al (2005) Physico-chemical surface characterization of a bacterial population isolated from a milking machine. Food Microbiol 22:247–251. doi:10.1016/j.fm.2004.03.010
Vacheethasanee K, Temenoff JS, Higashi JM et al (1998) Bacterial surface properties of clinically isolated Staphylococcus epidermidis strains determine adhesion on polyethylene. J Biomed Mater Res 42:425–432
Vadillo-Rodríguez V, Busscher HJ, Van Der Mei HC et al (2005) Role of lactobacillus cell surface hydrophobicity as probed by AFM in adhesion to surfaces at low and high ionic strength. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 41:33–41. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2004.10.028
Van Oss CJ, Good RJ, Chaudhury MK (1986) The role of van der Waals forces and hydrogen bonds in “hydrophobic interactions” between biopolymers and low energy surfaces. Role van der Waals forces hydrog bond “hydrophobic interact between biopolym low energy surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci 111:378–390
von Eiff C, Peters G, Heilmann C (2002) Pathogenesis of infections due to coagulasenegative staphylococci. Lancet Infect Dis 2:677–685. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(02)00438-3
Vornhagen J, Stevens M, McCormick D et al (2013) Coaggregation occurs amongst bacteria within and between domestic showerhead biofilms. Biofouling 29:53–68. doi:10.1080/08927014.2012.744395
Vuong C, Otto M (2002) Staphylococcus epidermidis infections. Microbes Infect 4:481–489. doi:10.1016/S1286-4579(02)01563-0
Younes JA, van der Mei HC, van den Heuvel E et al (2012) Adhesion forces and coaggregation between vaginal staphylococci and lactobacilli. PLoS ONE 7:1–8. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036917
Acknowledgements
This work was performed in the Department of Biomedical Engineering, University Medical Center Groningen. The authors acknowledge all support provided by members of that department. TN was supported by Directorate General of Higher Education Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education of the Republic of Indonesia and a grant from the University Medical Center Groningen. BPK is supported by a Grant from the University of Amsterdam for research into the focal point ‘‘Oral Infections and Inflammation’’.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nuryastuti, T., Krom, B.P. Ica-status of clinical Staphylococcus epidermidis strains affects adhesion and aggregation: a thermodynamic analysis. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 110, 1467–1474 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-017-0899-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-017-0899-2