Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Platform pricing and blockchain adoption for capacity sharing with cross-network externality and supply risk

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 29 March 2024

This article has been updated

Abstract

Platform-based capacity sharing is a new business format of sharing economy to reallocate spare production resources via industrial internet, generating collaborative manufacturing related platform operations issues. This paper examines the impact of cross-network externality and supply risk of the two-sided market on the pricing and blockchain adopting decisions of capacity sharing platforms. The mean–variance model is employed to depict the impact of purchasers’ or suppliers’ risk-sensitive types on platform pricing, where purchasers’ or suppliers’ risk-sensitive types can be identified by blockchain technology and be intertwined by the cross-network externality. The obtained platform’s optimal pricing under two scenarios with risk-sensitive capacity purchasers (D) and risk-sensitive suppliers (S) shows that the platform charges risk-seeking, risk-neutral and risk-averse users in descending order for the platform side containing risk-sensitive users, regardless of the comparison of bilateral cross-network externalities. However, for risk-neutral side users, the price ranking under three risk-sensitive types depends on the relative size of bilateral cross-network externalities. In addition, blockchain technology always decreases the surplus of risk-sensitive side users, whereas it increases the surplus of risk-insensitive side users. Further, we find that platform prefers to introduce blockchain technology when the fixed cost of introducing it is less than the profit increment it brings. In addition, by comparing platform profits and blockchain value in the two scenarios, we argue that platforms need to comprehensively balance the comparison of fixed costs of introducing blockchain on both sides and the importance of risk-preferring and risk-averse users to improve their profitability. Introducing blockchain technology to the side where the cost of blockchain technology is higher may result in higher blockchain value for the platform. Finally, we examine the platform with two-sided risk-sensitive users and the results are robust. This study proposes theoretical explanation for platform pricing considering the cross-network externality and risk-sensitive users, as well as some management insights for the application of blockchain technology in platform operations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  • Akter, S., Michael, K., Uddin, M. R., & McCarthy, M. R. (2020). Transforming business using digital innovations: The application of ai, blockchain, cloud and data analytics. Annals of Operations Research, 308(1–2), 7–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. G., Parker, G. G., & Tan, B. (2014). Platform performance investment in the presence of network externalities. Information Systems Research, 25(1), 152–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, M. (2006). Competition in two-sided markets. The Rand Journal of Economics, 37(3), 668–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakos, Y., & Halaburda, H. (2020). Platform competition with multihoming on both sides: Subsidize or not? Management Science, 66(12), 5599–5607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behl, A., Sampat, B., Pereira, V., Jayawardena, N. S., & Laker, B. (2023). Investigating the role of data-driven innovation and information quality on the adoption of blockchain technology on crowdfunding platforms. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05290-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belleflamme, P., & Peitz, M. (2019). Platform competition: Who benefits from multihoming? International Journal of Industrial Organization, 64, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, Y.-J., Choi, T.-M., & Zhang, J. (2020). Platform supported supply chain operations in the blockchain era: Supply contracting and moral hazards*. Decision Sciences, 54(2), 866–892.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles, V., Emrouznejad, A., & Gherman, T. (2023). A critical analysis of the integration of blockchain and artificial intelligence for supply chain. Annals of Operations Research, 327(1), 7–47

  • Chen, M., Xia, Y, & Wang X. (2010). "Managing supply uncertainties through bayesian information update." IEEE Transactions on Automation Science & Engineering, 7(1), 24–36.

  • Choi, T.-M. (2019). Blockchain-technology-supported platforms for diamond authentication and certification in luxury supply chains. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 128, 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, T.-M. (2022). Achieving economic sustainability: Operations research for risk analysis and optimization problems in the blockchain era. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04394-5

  • Choi, T.-M., Feng, L., & Li, R. (2020a). Information disclosure structure in supply chains with rental service platforms in the blockchain technology era. International Journal of Production Economics, 221, 107473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, T.-M., Guo, S., Liu, N., & Shi, X. (2020b). Optimal pricing in on-demand-service-platform-operations with hired agents and risk-sensitive customers in the blockchain era. European Journal of Operational Research, 284(3), 1031–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, T.-M., & Ouyang, X. (2021). Initial coin offerings for blockchain based product provenance authentication platforms. International Journal of Production Economics, 233, 107995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciarallo, F. W., Akella, R., & Morton, T. E. (1994). A periodic review, production planning model with uncertain capacity and uncertain demand—Optimality of extended myopic policies. Management Science, 40(3), 320–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çınar, E., & Güllü, R. (2012). An inventory model with capacity flexibility in the existence of advance capacity information. Decision Support Systems, 53(2), 320–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R., & Vincent, N. (2012). Capacity-contingent pricing and competition in the airline industry. Journal of Air Transport Management, 24, 7–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, L., Geng, X., Xiao, G., & Yang, N. (2022). Procurement strategies with unreliable suppliers under correlated random yields. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 24(1), 179–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, Z.-P., Wu, X.-Y., & Cao, B.-B. (2022). Considering the traceability awareness of consumers: Should the supply chain adopt the blockchain technology? Annals of Operations Research, 309(2), 837–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, N., Chen, J., Feng, H., & Li, M. (2020). Optimal product selection and pricing strategies for platform vendors under two-sided network effects. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 43, 100990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2020.100990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Güllü, R., Nol, E., & Erkip, N. (1999). Analysis of an inventory system under supply uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, 59(1–3), 377–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, L., & Wu, X. (2018). Capacity sharing between competitors. Management Science, 64(8), 3554–3573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, S., Zhao, L., & Xu, X. (2013). Impact of supply risks on procurement decisions. Annals of Operations Research, 241(1–2), 411–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, W., Bakshi, N., & DeMiguel, V. (2018). Wholesale price contracts for reliable supply. Production and Operations Management, 27(6), 1021–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazaz, B., & Webster, S. (2015). Technical note—Price-setting newsvendor problems with uncertain supply and risk aversion. Operations Research, 63(4), 807–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, S. P. (2013). Two-sided markets. The Australian Economic Review, 46(2), 247–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouvelis, P., Xiao, G., & Yang, N. (2021). Role of risk aversion in price postponement under supply random yield. Management Science, 67(8), 4826–4844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kung, L.-C., & Zhong, G.-Y. (2017). The optimal pricing strategy for two-sided platform delivery in the sharing economy. Transportation Research Part e: Logistics and Transportation Review, 101, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, M., Pan, X. A., & Zheng, Q. (2020). Platform pricing with strategic buyers the impact of future production cost. Production and Operations Management, 29(9), 1122–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, L., Xue, W., Zhao, Y., & Zeng, Q. (2017). Loss-averse newsvendor problem with supply risk. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 67(2), 214–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, W., Wang, Q., Yang, H., & Zhang, Y. (2019). An analysis of price competition and price wars in Australia’s domestic airline market. Transport Policy, 81, 163–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merzifonluoglu, Y. (2015). Impact of risk aversion and backup supplier on sourcing decisions of a firm. International Journal of Production Research, 53(22), 6937–6961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moghaddam, M., & Nof, S. Y. (2016). Real-time optimization and control mechanisms for collaborative demand and capacity sharing. International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 495–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamoto, S. (2009). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Consulted. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

  • Qin, J., Wang, K., Wang, Z., & Xia, L. (2018). Revenue sharing contracts for horizontal capacity sharing under competition. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-3005-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renna, P., & Argoneto, P. (2011). Capacity sharing in a network of independent factories: A cooperative game theory approach. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 27(2), 405–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2006). Two-sided markets-a progress report. RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3), 645–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seok, H., & Nof, S. Y. (2014a). Collaborative capacity sharing among manufacturers on the same supply network horizontal layer for sustainable and balanced returns. International Journal of Production Research, 52(6), 1622–1643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seok, H., & Nof, S. Y. (2014b). Dynamic coalition reformation for adaptive demand and capacity sharing. International Journal of Production Economics, 147, 136–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, Y., Liu, J., Zhang, W., & Li, J. (2022). Blockchain's role in e-commerce sellers' decision-making on information disclosure under competition. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04276-w

  • Tan, B., Anderson, E. G., & Parker, G. G. (2020). Platform pricing and investment to drive third-party value creation in two-sided networks. Information Systems Research, 31(1), 217–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, S. Y., Gurnani, H., & Gupta, D. (2014). Managing disruptions in decentralized supply chains with endogenous supply process reliability. Production and Operations Management, 23(7), 1198–1211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., Chen, X., Xu, X., & Jin, W. (2023). Financing and operating strategies for blockchain technology-driven accounts receivable chains. European Journal of Operational Research, 304(3), 1279–1295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S., Chen, H., & Wu, D. (2019). Regulating platform competition in two-sided markets under the o2o era. International Journal of Production Economics, 215, 131–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen, X., & Siqin, T. (2020). How do product quality uncertainties affect the sharing economy platforms with risk considerations? A mean-variance analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 224, 107544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., & Wang, X. (2023). Platform-leading blockchain adoption for traceability under upstream competition. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-05147-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., & Yu, J. (2022). Blockchain’s impact on platform supply chains: Transaction cost and information transparency perspectives. International Journal of Production Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2022.2027037

  • Wu, M., Zhu, S. X., & Teunter, R. H. (2013). The risk-averse newsvendor problem with random capacity. European Journal of Operational Research, 231(2), 328–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Q., & He, Y. (2021). Optimal information disclosure strategies for a retail platform in the blockchain technology era. International Journal of Production Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1976434

  • Xu, X., He, P., Zhou, L., & Cheng, T. C. (2023a). Coordination of a platform-based supply chain in the marketplace or reselling mode considering cross-channel effect and blockchain technology. European Journal of Operational Research, 309(1), 170–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, X., Yan, L., Choi, T.-M., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2023b). When is it wise to use blockchain for platform operations with remanufacturing? European Journal of Operational Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2023.01.063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yavaprabhas, K., Pournader, M., & Seuring, S. (2022). Blockchain as the “trust-building machine” for supply chain management. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04868-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, S. W., & Nof, S. Y. (2011). Affiliation/dissociation decision models in demand and capacity sharing collaborative network. International Journal of Production Economics, 130(2), 135–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zennyo, Y. (2016). Competition between vertically differentiated platforms. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 16(3), 309–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., Chen, H., & Zhao, D. (2020). Pricing strategy and business model determination of service platform under demand and output uncertainty. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 28(12), 130–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, D., Du, Q., & Xu, C. (2015). Strategies of manufacturing capability sharing based on internet of things platform. Journal of Tianjin University (social Sciences), 17(2), 97–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, D., & Han, H. (2020). Decisions and coordination in a capacity sharing supply chain considering production cost misreporting. Complexity, 2020, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, D., Han, H., Shang, J., & Hao, J. (2020). Decisions and coordination in a capacity sharing supply chain under fixed and quality-based transaction fee strategies. Computers & Industrial Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106841

  • Zhao, D., Hao, J., Cao, C., & Han, H. (2019). Evolutionary game analysis of three-player for low-carbon production capacity sharing. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11112996

  • Zhao, D., & Li, R. (2018). Research on decision-making of firm’s surplus resources sharing in cloud manufacturing. Industrial Engineering and Management, 23(2), 33–39.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the editors and anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions that have helpfully improved the study. This work is partially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) Grants (Nos. 92167206, 72091214, 91646118, 72132007) and The Science & Technology Pillar Key Program of Tianjin Key Research and Development Plan (20YFZCGX00640).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Management and Economics & The Laboratory of Computation and Analytics of Complex Management Systems (CACMS), Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China

    Longfei He, Xiao Zhang & Baofeng Huo

  2. Kent Business School, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NZ, UK

    Yang Zhang

Authors
  1. Longfei He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiao Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Baofeng Huo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yang Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiao Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, L., Zhang, X., Huo, B. et al. Platform pricing and blockchain adoption for capacity sharing with cross-network externality and supply risk. Ann Oper Res (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-024-05850-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-024-05850-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation