Skip to main content
Log in

Idlefish or not? Online platform’s strategy of secondhand marketplace introduction in the presence of consumer’s uncertain preferences and strategic behavior

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Secondhand marketplace has received a dramatic growth as secondhand trading becomes a sustainable way of life worldwide. We propose a game-theoretical model to explore online retail platform’s strategy of secondhand marketplace introduction when facing consumer’s uncertain preferences. The platform sells new product for the manufacturer and decides whether to open a secondhand product for consumers to purchase secondhand product. Consumers are strategic in their purchase of new product and secondhand product in two sequential periods. We find that the presence of secondhand marketplace induces the manufacturer to lower the retail price for new product when retail price of secondhand product is low but increase the price otherwise. The secondhand marketplace may benefit the platform when the retail price of secondhand product is moderate, but may harm the platform when the price is low or high, depending on the unit production cost of new product. Interestingly, it is never optimal for the manufacturer when the retail price of secondhand product is substantially low, but may be beneficial otherwise, depending on the unit production cost of new product. Examining the value of secondhand marketplace, it creates a win–win situation for the two parties when the retail price of secondhand product is not low, and improves the consumer surplus under certain circumstances. The extended case of consumer depreciation of secondhand product verifies the robustness of the basic model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See https://www.alizila.com/recommerce-takes-off-in-china-as-apps-such-as-alibabas-idle-fish-make-recycling-easier/ (accessed on August 17, 2023).

  2. See https://www.sohu.com/a/521382194_120971445 (accessed on August 17, 2023).

  3. See https://ixtenso.com/retail-marketing/secondhand-trading-takes-off-in-china.html (accessed on August 17, 2023).

  4. See https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/546176794?utm_id=0 (accessed on August 17, 2023).

  5. See https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1735773403221515962&wfr=spider&for=pc (accessed on August 17, 2023).

  6. See https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1747076286523233378&wfr=spider&for=pc (accessed on August 17, 2023).

  7. We consider exogenous price of secondhand product with two reasons. First, as the Introduction section describes, this study considers that consumers trade secondhand products not for profit. The consumers may be preference-oriented, fad-driven or environmentally-conscious. Second, in practice, the price of a secondhand product is the result of a joint decision by all the merchants in the secondhand market. In the case of used cars, for example, if an individual seller does not know the exact value of the car, it will be very difficult to sell it. Either the individual seller will lose money by selling it for less than it is worth, or will have to wait too long before someone may buy or sell the family’s overpriced secondhand car or even fail to sell it. So individual sellers are referring to the prices of other similar items in order to make more profit. See an illustrative example in the Appendix.

  8. When operating the secondhand marketplace, the online retail platform generally does not charge a fee for reselling service, but charges a fee for the service of inspection and guarantee. We consider non-negative value of \(\tau \) to be consistent with this practice. See also https://m.39zn.cn/article/184825.htm (accessed on August 17, 2023).

  9. See https://www.sohu.com/a/135867053_115514 (accessed on May 25, 2023).

  10. See https://k.sina.cn/article_6000526692_165a8c5640010090dj.html?ab=qiche&_rewriteTime=1684993947867 (accessed on May 25, 2023).

  11. See https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1752417836099848523&wfr=spider&for=pc (accessed on May 25, 2023).

  12. See http://www.bigdata-research.cn/content/202006/1085.html (accessed on May 25, 2023).

References

  • Alan, Y., Kurtuluş, M., & Wang, C. (2019). The role of store brand spillover in a retailer’s category management strategy. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 21(3), 620–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aviv, Y., & Pazgal, A. (2008). Optimal pricing of seasonal products in the presence of forward-looking consumers. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 10(3), 339–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basak, S., Basu, P., Avittathur, B., & Sikdar, S. (2017). A game theoretic analysis of multichannel retail in the context of “showrooming.” Decision Support Systems, 103, 34–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, K., & Choi, T. M. (2022). Optimal trade-in return policies: Is it wise to be generous? Production and Operations Management, 31(3), 1309–1331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong, C., Lei, Y., & Liu, Q. (2023). (Un) conditional collection policies on used products with strategic customers. Production and Operations Management, 32(1), 82–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, X., Zhang, J., & Zhu, G. (2020). Effects of consumers’ uncertain valuation-for-quality in a distribution channel. Annals of Operations Research.

  • Gardete, P. M., & Guo, L. (2021). Prepurchase information acquisition and credible advertising. Management Science, 67(3), 1696–1717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, L., & Zhang, J. (2012). Consumer deliberation and product line design. Marketing Science, 31(6), 995–1007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, L., & Chen, Y. J. (2014). Return policy: Hassle-free or your money-back guarantee? Naval Research Logistics, 61(5), 403–417.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, X., Gu, J.-W., Ching, W.-K., & Siu, T.-K. (2014). Impact of secondary market on consumer return policies and supply chain coordination. Omega, 45, 57–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, S. O., Üster, H., & Savaskan-Ebert, R. C. (2023). Reverse channel selection for commercial product returns under time-to-market and product value considerations. Annals of Operations Research, 1–38.

  • Jiang, L., Dimitrov, S., & Mantin, B. (2017). P2P marketplaces and retailing in the presence of consumers’ valuation uncertainty. Production and Operations Management, 26(3), 509–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, X., & Zheng, Y. (2023). Pricing decisions and remanufacturing strategies considering consumer recycling behavior. Annals of Operations Research, 322(2), 755–792.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. H., & Rhee, B.-D. (2018). Retailer-run resale market and optimal returns and resale policy. European Journal of Operational Research, 268(2), 504–514.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H., & Whang, S. (2002). The impact of the secondary market on the supply chain. Management Science, 48(6), 719–731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, G., Li, L., & Sun, J. (2019a). Pricing and service effort strategy in a dual-channel supply chain with showrooming effect. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 126, 32–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, T., Xie, J., & Liu, X. (2020). Consumer return policies in presence of a P2P market. Omega, 97, 102092.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Feng, L., Govindan, K., & Xu, F. (2019b). Effects of a secondary market on original equipment manufactures’ pricing, trade-in remanufacturing, and entry decisions. European Journal of Operational Research, 279(3), 751–766.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H., Lei, M., Deng, H., Leong, G. K., & Huang, T. (2016). A dual channel, quality-based price competition model for the WEEE recycling market with government subsidy. Omega, 59, 290–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, W., Zhao, C., Ke, H., & Chen, Z. (2020). Retailer’s return policy in the presence of P2P secondary market. Electronic Commerce Research, 39, 100899.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantin, B., Krishnan, H., & Dhar, T. (2014). The strategic role of third-party marketplaces in retailing. Production and Operations Management, 23(11), 1937–1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neto, J. Q. F., Bloemhof, J., & Corbett, C. (2016). Market prices of remanufactured, used and new items: Evidence from eBay. International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 371–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oraiopoulos, N., Ferguson, M. E., & Toktay, L. B. (2012). Relicensing as a secondary market strategy. Management Science, 58(5), 1022–1037.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, B., Xu, X., & Yuan, Q. (2020). Selling secondhand products through an online platform with blockchain. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 142, 102066.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, J. D., & Coughlan, A. T. (2007). Used goods, not used bads: Profitable secondary market sales for a durable goods channel. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 5(2), 191–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shum, S., Tong, S., & Xiao, T. (2017). On the impact of uncertain cost reduction when selling to strategic customers. Management Science, 63(3), 843–860.

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, X. (2007). Intertemporal pricing with strategic customer behavior. Management Science, 53(5), 726–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, X. (2009). Consumer returns policies and supply chain performance. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 11(4), 595–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Yan, S., & Han, X. (2022). Digital showroom strategies for dual-channel supply chains in the presence of consumer webrooming behavior. Annals of Operations Research, 1–40.

  • Sun, Y., Wang, Z., & Han, X. (2020). Supply chain channel strategies for online retailers: Whether to introduce web showrooms? Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 144, 102122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taleizadeh, A. A., Govindan, K., & Ebrahimi, N. (2020). The effect of promotional cost sharing on the decisions of two-level supply chain with uncertain demand. Annals of Operations Research, 290, 747–781.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tian, L., Vakharia, A. J., Tan, Y., & Xu, Y. (2018). Marketplace, reseller, or hybrid: Strategic analysis of an emerging e-commerce model. Production and Operations Management, 27(8), 1595–1610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedantam, A., Demirezen, E. M., & Kumar, S. (2021). Trade-in or sell in My P2P marketplace: A game theoretic analysis of profit and environmental impact. Production and Operations Management, 30(11), 3923–3942.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., & He, S. (2022). Optimal decisions of modularity, prices and return policy in a dual-channel supply chain under mass customization. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 160, 102675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong, Y., Zhao, P., Xiong, Z., & Li, G. (2016). The impact of product upgrading on the decision of entrance to a secondary market. European Journal of Operational Research, 252(2), 443–454.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, L., Li, Y., Govindan, K., & Xu, X. (2015). Consumer returns policies with endogenous deadline and supply chain coordination. European Journal of Operational Research, 242(1), 88–99.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, X., & Han, X. (2022). Optimal pricing and remanufacturing entry strategies of manufacturers in the presence of online reviews. Annals of Operations Research, 316(1), 59–92.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, G., Ji, G., & Tan, K. H. (2022). Impact of artificial intelligence adoption on online returns policies. Annals of Operations Research, 1–24.

  • Yin, S., Ray, S., Gurnani, H., & Animesh, A. (2010). Durable products with multiple used goods markets: Product upgrade and retail pricing implications. Marketing Science, 29(3), 540–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Y., Li, X., & Xu, X. (2022). Reselling or marketplace mode for an online platform: the choice between cap-and-trade and carbon tax regulation. Annals of Operations Research, 1–37.

  • Zha, Y., Guo, X., Chen, H., & Ling, L. (2022). How does store branded lookalike packaging affect competition in a dyadic supply chain: A consumer confusion perspective. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 165, 102841.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W., & Ma, L. (2021). Research and application of second-hand commodity price evaluation methods on B2C platform: take the used car platform as an example. Annals of Operations Research.

  • Zhang, M., Eliassen, F., Taherkordi, A., Jacobsen, H. A., Chung, H. M., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Demand–response games for peer-to-peer energy trading with the hyperledger blockchain. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 52(1), 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W. Y., Zhang, S., Qi, F., & Cai, M. (2014). A self-organized P2P approach to manufacturing service discovery for cross-enterprise collaboration. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 44(3), 263–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z., Xu, H., Chen, K., Zhao, Y., & Liu, Z. (2023). Channel mode selection for an E-platform supply chain in the presence of a secondary marketplace. European Journal of Operational Research, 305(3), 1215–1235.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, H., Liu, Q., Zhu, H., Ge, Y., Chen, E., Zhu, Y., et al. (2017). A sequential approach to market state modeling and analysis in online p2p lending. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 48(1), 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Y., Xiong, Y., & Jin, M. (2021). Less is more: Consumer education in a closed-loop supply chain with remanufacturing. Omega, 101, 102259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, X., Wang, M., Chen, G., & Chen, X. (2016). The effect of implementing trade-in strategy on duopoly competition. European Journal of Operational Research, 248(3), 856–868.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Z., Zhang, F., Xu, X., & Jiang, A. (2023). Retailer’s optimal pricing decisions when offering installment in the presence of P2P market. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 58, 101245.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 71801056, 71971205, 72188101, 72171220, 72091210/72091215,72371235), the Ministry of education of Humanities and Social Science Project (No. 22YJC630011) and Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (No. 2022B1515120060).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yujing Chen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 58 kb)

Appendices

Appendices

Appendix A: Comparisons of cases N and I

See Table 5.

Table 5 Price, demand and profit changes between cases N and I

Appendix B: Threshold values of \({{\varvec{p}}}_{0}\), \({\varvec{c}}\) and \({\varvec{\tau}}\)

See Table 6.

Table 6 Threshold values on \({p}_{0}\), \(c\), and \(\tau \)
$$ \tilde{c}_{2} = \frac{{\delta \left( {2p_{0} - \alpha \delta } \right)\left( {1 - \phi } \right)^{2} + \sqrt {\delta^{2} \left( {1 - \phi } \right)^{2} \left( {4\left( {p_{0} - \tau } \right)\left( {1 - \alpha } \right)\delta \left( {\alpha \delta - p_{0} } \right) - 8\left( {p_{0} - \tau } \right)\left( {1 - \alpha } \right)\delta \left( {\alpha \delta - p_{0} } \right)\phi + \left( {2p_{0} - \alpha \delta } \right)^{2} \phi^{2} } \right)} }}{{\delta^{2} \left( {1 - 2\phi } \right)}}, $$
$$ \begin{gathered} \tilde{c}_{3} = \frac{1}{{\delta^{2} \left( {1 - 2\phi } \right)}}(\delta \left( {1 - \phi } \right)\left( {p_{0} \left( {2 - \alpha } \right)\left( {1 - \phi } \right) - \tau \left( {2 - \alpha - \phi + \alpha \phi } \right)} \right) - \surd (\delta^{2} \left( {1 - \phi } \right)^{2} (\alpha^{2} \left( {1 - \delta } \right)\delta^{2} \left( {1 - 2\phi } \right) - \hfill \\ 2\tau \alpha^{2} \delta \left( {1 - \delta - 2\phi + 2\delta \phi } \right) + \tau^{2} \left( {4 - \left( {4 - \alpha } \right)\alpha \left( {1 - \delta } \right) - 3\delta - 4\phi + 2\left( {3 - \alpha } \right)\left( {\alpha + \left( {1 - \alpha } \right)\delta } \right)\phi + \left( {1 - \alpha } \right)^{2} \phi^{2} } \right) + \hfill \\ p_{0}^{2} \left( {2 - \alpha } \right)^{2} \left( {\left( {1 - \phi } \right)^{2} - \delta \left( {1 - 2\phi } \right)} \right) + 2p_{0} (\alpha \delta \left( {2 - \alpha } \right)\left( {1 - \delta } \right)\left( { - 1 + 2\phi } \right) + \tau (\left( {2 - \left( {4 - \alpha } \right)\alpha } \right)\left( { - 1 + \delta } \right) + (2 - 4\delta + \hfill \\ \alpha \left( {2\alpha - 7 + 8\delta - 2\alpha \delta } \right))\phi - \left( {2 - \alpha } \right)\left( {1 - \alpha } \right)\phi^{2} ))))), \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$
$$ \begin{aligned} \tilde{c}_{4} & = \frac{1}{{\delta ^{2} \left( {1 - 2\phi } \right)}}(\delta \left( {1 - \phi } \right)\left( {p_{0} \left( {2 - \alpha } \right)\left( {1 - \phi } \right) - \tau \left( {2 - \alpha - \phi + \alpha \phi } \right)} \right) \\ & \quad + \surd (\delta ^{2} \left( {1 - \phi } \right)^{2} (\alpha ^{2} \left( {1 - \delta } \right)\delta ^{2} \left( {1 - 2\phi } \right) - 2\tau \alpha ^{2} \delta \left( {1 - \delta - 2\phi + 2\delta \phi } \right) \\ & \quad + \tau ^{2} \left( {4 - \left( {4 - \alpha } \right)\alpha \left( {1 - \delta } \right) - 3\delta - 4\phi + 2\left( {3 - \alpha } \right)\left( {\alpha + \left( {1 - \alpha } \right)\delta } \right)\phi + \left( {1 - \alpha } \right)^{2} \phi ^{2} } \right) \\ & \quad + p_{0}^{2} \left( {2 - \alpha } \right)^{2} \left( {\left( {1 - \phi } \right)^{2} - \delta \left( {1 - 2\phi } \right)} \right) + 2p_{0} (\alpha \delta \left( {2 - \alpha } \right)\left( {1 - \delta } \right)\left( { - 1 + 2\phi } \right) \\ & \quad + \tau (\left( {2 - \left( {4 - \alpha } \right)\alpha } \right)\left( { - 1 + \delta } \right) + (2 - 4\delta + \alpha \left( {2\alpha - 7 + 8\delta - 2\alpha \delta } \right))\phi - \left( {2 - \alpha } \right)\left( {1 - \alpha } \right)\phi ^{2} ))))), \end{aligned} $$
$$ \tilde{c}_{5} = \frac{{\alpha \delta \left( {1 - \phi } \right)^{2} - \sqrt {\delta \left( {1 - \phi } \right)^{2} \left( {\alpha \delta \left( {4\tau - 8\tau \phi + \alpha \phi^{2} } \right) - 4p_{0} \tau \left( {1 - 2\phi } \right)} \right)} }}{{\delta \left( {1 - 2\phi } \right)}}, $$
$$ \overline{c}_{2} = \alpha \left( {1 - \phi } \right) + \frac{{2\sqrt {\delta^{2} \left( {\alpha \delta - p_{0} } \right)\left( {p_{0} \left( {3 - 4\alpha } \right) + \alpha \left( {1 + 4\tau - 4p_{0} \left( {1 - \alpha } \right) - 4\tau \alpha } \right)\delta } \right)\left( {1 - \phi } \right)^{2} } }}{{\delta^{2} }}, $$
$$ \begin{aligned} \bar{c}_{3} & = \frac{1}{{\delta \left( {4\alpha + \delta - 4} \right)}}(\delta \left( {p_{0} \left( {6 - \alpha \left( {3 + 4\delta } \right)} \right) - 3\tau \left( {1 - \alpha } \right)} \right)\left( { - 1 + \phi } \right) \\ & \quad + \surd (\delta (\delta (2\tau \alpha \left( {1 - \alpha } \right)\left( {1 - 4\alpha } \right)\left( {1 - \delta } \right)\left( { - 4 + 4\alpha + \delta } \right) \\ & \quad + \alpha ^{2} \left( {4 - 4\alpha \left( {1 - \delta } \right) - \delta } \right)\left( {1 - \delta } \right)\left( {4 - 4\alpha - \delta } \right) + \tau ^{2} \left( {1 - \alpha } \right)^{2} \left( {3\left( { - 1 + \delta } \right) - 4\alpha \left( {1 - 4\alpha - \delta } \right)} \right)) \\ & \quad + 2p_{0} \delta (\alpha \left( {6 - \alpha \left( {9 - 4\alpha + 4\delta } \right)} \right)\left( {1 - \delta } \right)\left( {4 - 4\alpha - \delta } \right) \\ & \quad + \tau \left( {1 - \alpha } \right)\left( {6 - 6\delta + \alpha \left( {5 - 9\delta + 4\left( {5\alpha \delta - \alpha \left( {9 - 4\alpha } \right) + \delta ^{2} } \right)} \right)} \right)) \\ & \quad + p_{0}^{2} (\alpha (48 + \delta (12 - 60\delta + \alpha \left( {13 + 16\alpha ^{2} - 3\delta \left( {7 - 8\delta } \right) - 4\alpha \left( {17 - 9\delta } \right)} \right)))\\ &\quad - 48\left( {1 - \delta } \right)))\left( {1 - \phi } \right)^{2} )), \\ \end{aligned} $$

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zha, Y., Sun, Y., Chen, Y. et al. Idlefish or not? Online platform’s strategy of secondhand marketplace introduction in the presence of consumer’s uncertain preferences and strategic behavior. Ann Oper Res 333, 331–359 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05584-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05584-z

Keywords

Navigation