Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Quantifying the circularity of regional industrial waste across multi-channel enterprises

  • S.I.: SOME
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 01 July 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

Circular economy is a theoretical concept that is widely discussed in recent literature as a way to achieve increased sustainability. However, published literature focuses on how to increase circularity without analysing the status quo of circularity, which necessitates answering the question of how to measure the effectiveness of any actions implemented to advance Circular economy. Currently, there is no agreed methodology in literature on measuring the existing circularity. Therefore, this article proposes an analytical way to measure and map a regional waste economy’s circularity. The framework can be applied at a granularity of an individual materials level as well as overall at a regional level, and can quantify with a potential to improve towards a more circular economy in value as well as in volume. Data mining, conditioning, and, mathematical analysis was conducted across a number of public and private databases such as ORBIS and The Environment Agency. The proposed framework was tested taking a case of a region in the North East of England with 35,116 active companies. The methodology was validated on a different data set from another region. The results show that the methodology is able to measure a regional circularity overall as well as at an individual material level. The outcome of this research would be useful for policy makers as well as manufacturing organisations, and waste management companies as benchmarking allows a comparison between effectiveness of regional environmental regulations with their influence on driving sustainability and circular economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Source: Makridakis et al. (1998)

Fig. 2

Source: https://www.gbmaps.com/postcodemaps/uk-postcode-area-map.htm

Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 01 July 2020

    This erratum is published due to proofing error noticed with Table 5 which had been processed as image with the red box missing in the published article.

References

  • Allwood, J. M., Ashby, M. F., Gutowski, T. G., & Worrell, E. (2011). Material efficiency: A white paper. Resources, Conservation and Recycling,55(3), 362–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.11.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D. (2015). The circular economy, design thinking and education for sustainability. Local Economy,30(3), 305–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094215578226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilitewski, B. (2012). The circular economy and its risks. Waste Management,32(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.10.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburg, M., & Rebs, T. (2015). Sustainable supply chain management: A modeling perspective. Anals of Operations Research,229, 213–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-1853-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, P. H., & Rechberger, H. (2004). Practical handbook of material flow analysis, advanced methods in resource and waste management. Boca Raton, London, New York, Washington, D.C.: CRC Press Company/Lewis Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau Van Dijk. (2017). Orbis: Company Information around the Globe. https://www.bvdinfo.com/en-gb/our-products/company-information/international-products/orbis. Accessed June 15, 2017.

  • Clark, C. (1940). The conditions of economic progress. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Court, C. D., Munday, M., Roberts, A., & Turner, K. (2015). Can hazardous waste supply chain hotspots be identified using an input–output framework? European Journal of Operational Research,241, 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.08.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Data Landscape. (2017). What limits data-sharing in Europe? http://datalandscape.eu/data-driven-stories/what-limits-data-sharing-europe. Accessed July 10, 2017.

  • Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affair. (2015). UK response to European Commission public consultations on the circular economy and on the functioning of waste markets. London: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affair.

    Google Scholar 

  • Despeisse, M., Baumers, M., Brown, P., Charnley, S. J., Ford, F., Garmulewicz, A., et al. (2017). Unlocking value for a circular economy through 3D printing: A research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,115, 75–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EEA. (2016). Circular economy in Europe—Developing the knowledge base (Vol. 2). København: European Environmental Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elia, V., Gnoni, M. G., & Tornese, F. (2017). Measuring circular economy strategies through index methods: A critical analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production,142(4), 2741–2751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2012). Efficiency vs effectiveness. https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/circular-economy/interactive-diagram/efficiency-vs-effectiveness. Accessed January 25, 2017.

  • Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2015a). Circular economy overview. https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/circular-economy/overview/concept. Accessed January 25, 2017.

  • Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2015b). Circular economy characteristics. https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/circular-economy/overview/characteristics. Accessed January 25, 2017.

  • Environment Agency. (2017). Waste flow data based on reported quantities in correspondence of issued waste handling permits. Newcastle: Environment Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Audit Committee. (2014). Growing a circular economy: Ending the throwaway society. London: The Stationery Office Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2006). Amending directive 2006/12/EC on waste. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2008). Amending directive 2008/98/EC on waste. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2014). Moving towards a circular economy through industrial symbiosis. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2016). Closing the loop—An EU action plan for the circular economy. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament. (2006). Regulation (EC) No 1893/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 establishing the statistical classification of economic activities NACE Revision 2 and amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 3037/90 as well as certain EC Regulations on specific statistical domains. Official Journal of the European Union, 393(1), 1–39. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2006/1893/oj.

  • Fisher, A. G. B. (1935). The clash of progress and security. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foran, B., Lenzen, M., Dey, C., & Bilek, M. (2005). Integrating sustainable chain management with triple bottom line accounting. Ecological Economics,52(2), 143–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin-Johnson, E., Figge, F., & Canning, L. (2016). Resource duration as a managerial indicator for circular economy performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 133, 589–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebler, M., Schoot Uiterkamp, A. J. M., & Visser, C. (2014). A global sustainability perspective on 3D printing technologies. Energy Policy,74, 158–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The circular economy—A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production,143, 757–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geng, Y., Fu, J., Sarkis, J., & Xue, B. (2012). Towards a national circular economy indicator system in China: An evaluation and critical analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production,23(1), 216–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016). A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 11–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graedel, T., & Allenby, B. (2003). Industrial ecology (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, B., Geng, Y., Sterr, T., Zhu, Q., & Liu, Y. (2017). Investigating public awareness on circular economy in western China: A case of Urumqi Midong. Journal of Cleaner Production,142(4), 2177–2186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrickson, C., Horvath, A., Joshi, S., & Lave, L. (1998). Economic input–output models for environmental life-cycle assessment. Environmental Science & Technology Policy Analysis,32(7), 184–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, C., & Charles, D. (2009). Structural change and globalisation: Case study—North East England (UK). Contract No. 2008.CE.16.0.AT.020 concerning the ex post evaluation of cohesion policy programmes 2000–2006 co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (Objectives 1 and 2), Work Package 4, European Commission Directorate General Regional Policy, Policy Development, Evaluation Unit.

  • Hoekstra, A. Y., & Hung, P. Q. (2002). Virtual water trade: A quantification of virtual water flows between nations in relation to international crop trade. Value of water: Research report series no. 11.

  • International Organization for Standardization (2014). Environmental Management - Water Footprint - Principles, requirements and guidelines: ISO 14046.

  • Jensen, C. D., Mcintyre, S., Munday, M., & Turner, K. (2013). Responsibility for regional waste generation: A single-region extended input—output analysis for wales. Regional Studies,47(6), 913–933. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.599797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiaoa, W., & Boons, F. (2017). Policy durability of circular economy in China: A process analysis of policy translation. Resources, Conservation and Recycling,117(A), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.10.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kettinger, W. J., Teng, J. T. C., & Guha, S. (1997). Business process change: A study of methodologies, techniques, and tools. MIS Quarterly,21(1), 55–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/249742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen, D. K., Kjeldsen, C., & Hvarregaard Thorsøe, M. (2016). Enabling sustainable agro-food futures: Exploring fault lines and synergies between the integrated territorial paradigm, rural eco-economy and circular economy. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics,29(5), 749–765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-016-9632-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, M., Chen, P., Ma, H., & Nakamura, S. (2015). Identification of the driving force of waste generation using a high resolution waste input–output table. Journal of Cleaner Production,94, 294–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieder, M., & Rashid, A. (2016). Towards circular economy implementation: A comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production,115, 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopes de Sousa, A. B., Jabbour, C. J. C., Filho, M. G., & Roubaud, D. (2018). Industry 4.0 and the circular economy: A proposed research agenda and original roadmap for sustainable operations. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2772-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makridakis, S. G., Wheelwright, S. C., & Hyndman, R. J. (1998). Forecasting: methods and applications (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, W., Braungart, M., Anastas, P. T., & Zimmerman, J. B. (2003). Peer reviewed: Applying the principles of green engineering to cradle-to-cradle design. Environmental Science and Technology,37(23), 434A–441A. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0326322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R., & Blair, P. (2009). Input–output analysis: Foundations and extensions (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, S., & Kondo, Y. (2002). Input output analysis of waste management. Journal of Industrial Ecology,6(1), 39–63. https://doi.org/10.1162/108819802320971632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, S., & Kondo, Y. (2009). Waste input–output analysis: Concepts and application to industrial ecology (Vol. 26)., Series: Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, S., Nakajima, K., Kondo, Y., & Nagasaka, T. (2007). The waste input–output approach to materials flow analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology,11(4), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1162/jiec.2007.1290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2015). Input–output-tables. http://www.oecd.org/trade/input-outputtables.htm. Accessed June 20, 2017.

  • OECD.Stats (2006). Input–output-tables. http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=IOTS. Accessed November 25, 2018.

  • OECD.Stats. (2011). Input–output-tables. http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=IOTS. Accessed June 20, 2017.

  • Pomponi, F., & Moncaster, A. (2017). Circular economy for the built environment: A research framework. Journal of Cleaner Production,143, 710–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, P., Eksioglu, B., & Eksioglu, S. (2017). Recycling procurement strategies with variable yield suppliers. Anals of Operations Research,249, 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-1872-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salemdeeb, R., Tabbaa, A. A., & Reynolds, C. (2016). The UK waste input–output table: Linking waste generation to the UK economy. Waste Management and Research,34(10), 1089–1094. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242x16658545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauvé, S., Bernard, S., & Sloan, P. (2016). Environmental sciences, sustainable development and circular economy: Alternative concepts for trans-disciplinary research. Environmental Development,17, 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2015.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahel, W. R. (1997). The service economy: ‘Wealth without resource consumption’? Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences,355(1728), 1309–1319. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1997.0058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waste and Resource Action Programme. (2016). Estimates of food surplus and waste arisings in the UK. Banbury, Oxon: Waste and Resources Action Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waste and Resources Action Programme. (n.d). WRAP and the circular economy. http://www.wrap.org.uk/about-us/about/wrap-and-circular-economy. Accessed January 29, 2017.

  • Winans, K., Kendall, A., & Deng, H. (2017). The history and current applications of the circular economy concept. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,68(1), 825–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyaokińska, Z. (2016). The “new” environmental policy of the European Union: A path to development of a circular economy and mitigation of the negative effects of climate change. Comparative Economic Research,19(2), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1515/cer-2016-0013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, H., Zhao, H., & Guo, S. (2017). Evaluating the comprehensive benefit of eco-industrial parks by employing multi-criteria decision-making approach for circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production,142(4), 2262–2276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Durham University Business School, Mill Hill Lane, Durham, DH1 3LB, UK

    Claudia Schilkowski & Manish Shukla

  2. Management School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 1FL, UK

    Sonal Choudhary

Authors
  1. Claudia Schilkowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Manish Shukla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sonal Choudhary
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manish Shukla.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schilkowski, C., Shukla, M. & Choudhary, S. Quantifying the circularity of regional industrial waste across multi-channel enterprises. Ann Oper Res 290, 385–408 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03168-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03168-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation