Skip to main content
Log in

On De Finetti’s optimal impulse dividend control problem under Chapter 11 bankruptcy

  • Published:
Acta Mathematica Scientia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Motivated by recent advances made in the study of dividend control and risk management problems involving the U.S. bankruptcy code, in this paper we follow [44] to revisit the De Finetti dividend control problem under the reorganization process and the regulator’s intervention documented in U.S. Chapter 11 bankruptcy. We do this by further accommodating the fixed transaction costs on dividends to imitate the real-world procedure of dividend payments. Incorporating the fixed transaction costs transforms the targeting optimal dividend problem into an impulse control problem rather than a singular control problem, and hence computations and proofs that are distinct from [44] are needed. To account for the financial stress that is due to the more subtle concept of Chapter 11 bankruptcy, the surplus process after dividends is driven by a piece-wise spectrally negative Lévy process with endogenous regime switching. Some explicit expressions of the expected net present values under a double barrier dividend strategy, new to the literature, are established in terms of scale functions. With the help of these expressions, we are able to characterize the optimal strategy among the set of admissible double barrier dividend strategies. When the tail of the Lévy measure is log-convex, this optimal double barrier dividend strategy is then verified as the optimal dividend strategy, solving our optimal impulse control problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Albrecher H, Thonhauser S. Optimality results for dividend problems in insurance. Revista de la Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Fäsicasy Naturales, Serie A, Matematicas, 2009, 103(2): 295–320

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Artin E. The Gamma Function. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1964. English translation of German original, Einführung in die Theorie der Gammafunktion, Teubner, 1931

  3. Avanzi B. Strategies for dividend distribution: A Review. N Am Actuar J, 2009, 13(2): 217–251

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Avanzi B, Lau H, Wong B. Optimal periodic dividend strategies for spectrally positive Lévy risk processes with fixed transaction costs. Scand Actuar J, 2021, 8: 645–670

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Avanzi B, Lau H, Wong B. On the optimality of joint periodic and extraordinary dividend strategies. Eur J Oper Res, 2021, 295(3): 1189–1210

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Avram F, Palmowski Z, Pistorius M. On the optimal dividend problem for a spectrally negative Lévy process. Ann Appl Probab, 2007, 17(1): 156–180

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Avram F, Palmowski Z, Pistorius M. On Gerber-Shiu functions and optimal dividend distribution for a Lévy risk process in the presence of a penalty function. Ann Appl Probab, 2015, 25(4): 1868–1935

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Broadie M, Chernov M, Sundaresan S. Optimal debt and equity values in the presence of chapter 7 and chapter 11. J Finance, 2007, 62(3): 1341–1377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Broadie M, Kaya O. A binomial lattice method for pricing corporate debt and modeling Chapter 11. J Financ Quant Anal, 2007, 42(2): 279–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheng X, Jin Z, Yang H. Optimal insurance strategies: a hybrid deep learning markov chain approximation approach. Astin Bull, 2020, 50(2): 1–29

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Cheung E, Wong J. On the dual risk model with Parisian implementation delays in dividend payments. Eur J Oper Res, 2017, 257(1): 159–173

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Constantin N. Convex Functions and Their Applications. A Contemporary Approach. New York: Springer, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  13. Corbae D, D’Erasmo P. Reorganization or liquidation: bankruptcy choice and firm dynamics. Unpublished Working Paper. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2017

  14. Dai M, Jiang L, Lin J. Pricing corporate debt with finite maturity and chapter 11 proceedings. Quant Financ, 2013, 13(12): 1855–1861

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. De Angelis T. Optimal dividends with partial information and stopping of a degenerate reflecting diffusion. Financ Stoch, 2020, 24(1): 71–123

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. De Finetti B. Su un’impostazion alternativa dell teoria collecttiva del rischio//Trans XVth Internat Congress Actuaries, 1957, 2: 433–443

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gerber H. Entscheidungskriterien fur den zusammengesetzten Poisson prozess. Mit Verein Schweiz Versicherungsmath, 1969, 69: 185–227

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Højgaard B, Taksar M. Controlling risk exposure and dividends payout schemes: insurance company example. Math Financ, 1999, 9(2): 153–182

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Ikeda N, Watanabe S. Stochastic Differential Equations and Diffusion Processes. New York: North Holland-Kodansha, 1981

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Jacod J, Shiryaev A. Limit Theorems for Stochastic Processes. Second ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2003

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Jeanblanc M, Shiryaev A. Optimization of the flow of dividends. Russian Mathematical Surveys, 1995, 50(2): 257–277

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Jin Z, Liao H, Yang Y, Yu X. Optimal dividend strategy for an insurance group with contagious default risk. Scand Actuar J, 2021, 4: 335–361

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Kyprianou A. Introductory Lectures on Fluctuations of Lévy Processes with Applications. Berlin: Springer Science and Business Media, 2014

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Kyprianou A, Loeffen R. Refracted Lévy processes. Ann I H Poincare-PR, 2010, 46(1): 24–44

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Kyprianou A, Palmowski Z. Distributional study of de Finetti’s dividend problem for a general Lévy insurance risk process. J Appl Probab, 2007, 44(2): 428–443

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Leland H. Corporate debt value, bond covenants, and optimal capital structure. J Finance, 1994, 49(4): 1213–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Li B, Tang Q, Wang L, Zhou X. Liquidation risk in the presence of Chapters 7 and 11 of the US bankruptcy code. J Financ Eng, 2014, 1(3): 1–19

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Li J, Liu G, Zhao J. OPtimal dividend-penalty strategies for insurance risk model with surplus-dependent premium. Acta Math Sci, 2020, 40B(1): 170–198

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Li X, Liu H, Tang Q, Zhu J. Liquidation risk in insurance under contemporary regulatory frameworks. Insur Math Econ, 2020, 93(1): 36–49

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Li Y, Zhou X. On pre-exit joint occupation times for spectrally negative Lévy processes. Stat Probabil Lett, 2014, 94(1): 48–55

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Loeffen R. On optimality of the barrier strategy in de Finetti’s dividend problem for spectrally negative Lévy processes. Ann Appl Probab, 2008, 18(5), 1669–1680

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Loeffen R. An optimal dividends problem with transaction costs for spectrally negative Lévy processes. Insur Math Econ, 2009, 45(1): 41–48

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Loeffen R, Renaud J. De Finetti’s optimal dividends problem with an affine penalty function at ruin. Insur Math Econ, 2010, 46(1): 98–108

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Loeffen R, Renaud J, Zhou X. Occupation times of intervals until first passage times for spectrally negative Lévy processes. Stoch Proc Appl, 2014, 124(3): 1408–1435

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Noba K. On the optimality of double barrier strategies for Lévy processes. Stoch Proc Appl, 2021, 131(1): 73–102

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Noba K, Pérez J, Yu X. On the bailout dividend problem for spectrally negative Markov additive models. SIAM J Control Optim, 2020, 58(2): 1049–1076

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Paseka A. Debt valuation with endogenous default and Chapter 11 reorganization. Working paper, University of Arizona, 2003

  38. Pistorius M. On exit and ergodicity of the spectrally one-sided Lévy process reflected at its infimum. J Theor Probab, 2004, 17(1): 183–220

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Perez J, Yamazaki K, Yu X. On the bail-out optimal dividend problem. J Optim Theory Appl, 2018, 179(2): 553–568

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Renaud J. On the time spent in the red by a refracted Lévy risk process. J Appl Probab, 2014, 51(4): 1171–1188

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Renaud J, Zhou X. Distribution of the present value of dividend payments in a Lévy risk model. J Appl Probab, 2007, 44(2): 420–427

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Shreve S, Lehoczky J, Gaver D. Optimal consumption for general diffusions with absorbing and reflecting barriers. SIAM J Control Optim, 1984, 22(1): 55–75

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Wang W, Wang Y, Chen P, Wu X. Dividend and capital injection optimization with transaction cost for spectrally negative Lévy risk processes. J Optim Theory Appl, 2022, 194(3): 924–965

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang W, Yu X, Zhou X. On optimality of barrier dividend control under endogenous regime switching with application to Chapter 11 bankruptcy. arXiv:2108.01800

  45. Wang W, Zhou X. General drawdown-based de Finetti optimization for spectrally negative Lévy risk processes. J Appl Probab, 2018, 55(2): 513–542

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhu J, Siu T, Yang H. Singular dividend optimization for a linear diffusion model with time-inconsistent preferences. Eur J Oper Res, 2020, 285(1): 66–80

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruixing Ming.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Wenyuan Wang acknowledges the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (12171405 and 11661074) and the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in Fujian Province University. Ruixing Ming acknowledges the financial support from the Characteristic & Preponderant Discipline of Key Construction Universities in Zhejiang Province (Zhejiang Gongshang University - Statistics), Collaborative Innovation Center of Statistical Data Engineering Technology & Application, Digital + Discipline Construction Project (SZJ2022B004).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, W., Ming, R. & Hu, Y. On De Finetti’s optimal impulse dividend control problem under Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Acta Math Sci 44, 215–233 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10473-024-0112-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10473-024-0112-4

Key words

2020 MR Subject Classification

Navigation