Skip to main content
Log in

Cognitive radio testing using psychometric approaches: applicability and proof of concept study

  • Published:
Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cognitive radios promise efficient spectrum use and other performance improvements through use of machine learning to adapt the radios’ operational parameters to optimize performance; however, their flexibility complicates evaluation of cognitive radios’ performance. We propose to improve cognitive radio development and evaluation using approaches developed for efficiently measuring and testing human cognitive characteristics. Cognitive radio performance evaluation requirements and applicable psychometric approaches are described. Finally, a proof of concept application of a psychometric measurement technique to evaluate cognitive engine performance is presented for simulated channel conditions for multiple prioritizations of optimization goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mitola, J. III., & Maguire, G. Q., Jr. (1999). Cognitive radio: making software radios more personal. IEEE Personal Communications, 6(4), 13–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Haykin, S. (2005). Cognitive radio: brain-empowered wireless communications. IEEE JSAC, 23(2), 201–220.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Soliman, S. (2004). Cognitive radio: Key performance indicators. BWRC Cognitive Radio Workshop. Retrieved February 28, 2012, from http://bwrc.eecs.berkeley.edu/Research/MCMA/CR%20Workshop/ssoliman_BWRC_CR_workshop.pdf.

  4. Zhao, Y., Mao, S., Neel, J. O., & Reed, J. H. (2009). Performance evaluation of cognitive radios: Metrics, utility functions, and methodology. Proceedings of the IEEE, 97(4), 642–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Application note: Testing modern radios. (2012). Solutions for designing software defined radios that employ legacy and modern modulation schemes with frequency hopping techniques. Retrieved February 28, 2012, from http://www2.tek.com/cmsreplive/tirep/12622/37W_21488_1_HR_2010.12.30.12.48.13_12622_EN.pdf.

  6. Application note: Installed radio testing with the 3500. (2012). Aeroflex. Retrieved February 28, 2012, from http://www.aeroflex.com/ats/products/prodfiles/appnotes/3500RT.pdf.

  7. Riihijärvi, J. & Agustí, R. (Eds.). (2010). Flexible and spectrum-aware radio access through measurements and modelling in cognitive radio systems, FARAMIR document number D2.1: State of the art review, April 30, 2010. Accessed February 28, 2012, from http://www.ict-faramir.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/deliverables/FARAMIR-D2.1-Final.pdf.

  8. Newman, T. R., Hasan, S. M. S., Depoy, D., Bose, T., & Reed, J. H. (2010). Designing and deploying a building-wide cognitive radio network testbed. IEEE Communications Magazine, 48(9), 106–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. N. (1982). Rating scale analysis: Rasch measurement. Chicago: MESA.

    Google Scholar 

  10. DeBoeck, P., & Wilson, M. (2004). Explanatory item response models. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Briggs, D. C., & Wilson, M. (2003). An introduction to multidimensional measurement using Rasch models. Journal of Applied Measurement, 4(1), 87–100.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rasch, G. (1980). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Newman, T. R. (2008). Multiple objective fitness functions for cognitive radio adaptation, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.

  14. Dietrich, C. B., Wolfe, E. W., & Vanhoy, G. M. (2012). Evaluation of multi-objective optimizers for cognitive radio using psychometric methods: analysis using unidimensional and multidimensional Rasch models, ICST CROWNCOM 2012. Sweden: Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Linacre, J. M. (2011). WINSTEPS Rasch measurement computer program (Version 3.71.0). Winsteps.com.

  16. Wright, B. D. & Linacre, M. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8, 370.o.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Amanna, A. E., Ali, D., Gadhiok, M., Price, M. & Reed, J. H. (2012). Cognitive radio engine parametric optimization utilizing Taguchi analysis. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2012(5).

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant 0851400 and by Virginia Tech’s Institute for Critical Technology and Applied Science (ICTAS). Thanks to Cecile Dietrich for suggesting this collaboration.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carl B. Dietrich.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dietrich, C.B., Wolfe, E.W. & Vanhoy, G.M. Cognitive radio testing using psychometric approaches: applicability and proof of concept study. Analog Integr Circ Sig Process 73, 627–636 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10470-012-9954-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10470-012-9954-0

Keywords

Navigation