Abstract
Ranked-set sampling (RSS) and judgment post-stratification (JPS) are related schemes in which more efficient statistical inference is obtained by creating a stratification based on ranking information. The rankings may be completely subjective, or they may be based on values of a covariate. Recent work has shown that regardless of how the rankings are done, the in-stratum cumulative distribution functions (CDFs) must satisfy certain constraints, and we show here that if the rankings are done according to a covariate, then tighter constraints must hold. We also show that under a mild stochastic ordering assumption, still tighter constraints must hold. Taking advantage of these new constraints leads to improved small-sample estimates of the in-stratum CDFs in all RSS and JPS settings. For JPS, the new constraints also lead to improved estimates of the overall CDF and the population mean.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bohn L.L., Wolfe D.A. (1994) The effect of imperfect judgment rankings on properties of procedures based on the ranked-set samples analog of the Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon statistic. Journal of the American Statistical Association 89: 168–176
Chen Z. (2001) The optimal ranked-set sampling scheme for inference on population quantiles. Statistica Sinica 11: 23–37
Davidson, R., Duclos, J.-Y. (2006). Testing for restricted stochastic dominance, Working paper. McGill University Department of Economics.
Dell T.R., Clutter J.L. (1972) Ranked set sampling theory with order statistics background. Biometrics 28: 545–555
Fligner M.A., MacEachern S.N. (2006) Nonparametric two-sample methods for ranked-set sample data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 101: 1107–1118
Frey, J., Ozturk, O. (2010). Constrained estimation using judgment post-stratification. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics (to appear).
Lohr S. (1999) Sampling: design and analysis. Duxbury, Pacific Grove
MacEachern S.N., Ozturk O., Wolfe D.A., Stark G.A. (2002) A new ranked set sample estimator of variance. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 64: 177–188
MacEachern S.N., Stasny E.A., Wolfe D.A. (2004) Judgement post-stratification with imprecise rankings. Biometrics 60: 207–215
McIntyre G.A. (1952) A method for unbiased selective sampling, using ranked sets. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 3: 385–390
McIntyre, G. A. (2005). A method for unbiased selective sampling, using ranked sets. The American Statistician, 59, 230–232 (originally appeared in Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 3, 385–390).
Ozturk O. (2007) Statistical inference under a stochastic ordering constraint in ranked set sampling. Journal of Nonparametric Statistics 19: 131–144
Ozturk O. (2008) Statistical inference in the presence of ranking error in ranked set sampling. Canadian Journal of Statistics 36: 577–594
Stokes S.L. (1977) Ranked set sampling with concomitant variables. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods 6(12): 1207–1211
Stokes S.L. (1995) Parametric ranked set sampling. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 47: 465–482
Stokes S.L., Sager T.W. (1988) Characterization of a ranked-set sample with application to estimating distribution functions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 83: 374–381
Takahasi K., Wakimoto K. (1968) On unbiased estimates of the population mean based on the sample stratified by means of ordering. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 20: 1–31
Wang X., Lim J., Stokes L. (2008) A nonparametric mean estimator for judgment post-stratified data. Biometrics 64: 355–363
Woodruff R.S. (1952) Confidence intervals for medians and other position measures. Journal of the American Statistical Association 47: 635–646
Zhu M., Wang Y.-G. (2005) Quantile estimation from ranked set sampling data. Sankhyā 67: 295–304
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Frey, J. Constrained nonparametric estimation of the mean and the CDF using ranked-set sampling with a covariate. Ann Inst Stat Math 64, 439–456 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10463-011-0326-9
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10463-011-0326-9