Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Transition of traditional method to deep learning based computer-aided system for breast cancer using Automated Breast Ultrasound System (ABUS) images: a review

  • Published:
Artificial Intelligence Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Breast cancer (BC) is the leading cause of death among women worldwide. Early detection and diagnosis of BC can help significantly reduce the mortality rate. Ultrasound (US) can be an ideal screening tool for BC detection. However, the hand-held US (HHUS) is an impractical tool because it is operator-dependent, time-consuming, and increases the likelihood of false-positive results. Thus, to address these issues, the 3D Automated Breast Ultrasound System (ABUS) was designed for BC detection and diagnosis. This paper presents the transition from traditional approaches to deep learning (DL) based CAD systems in the ABUS image data set. The capabilities and limitations of both techniques are also reviewed rigorously. This review will help in understanding the current limitations to leverage their potential in diagnostic radiology to improve performance and BC patient care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Badawy SM, Mohamed AENA, Hefnawy AA, Zidan HE, GadAllah MT, El-Banby GM (2021) Automatic semantic segmentation of breast tumors in ultrasound images based on combining fuzzy logic and deep learning—A feasibility study. PLoS ONE 16(5):e0251899

    Google Scholar 

  • Bian C, Lee R, Chou YH, Cheng JZ (2017) Boundary regularized convolutional neural network for layer parsing of breast anatomy in automated whole breast ultrasound. In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pp 259–266

  • Bluemke DA, Moy L, Bredella MA, Ertl-Wagner BB, Fowler KJ, Goh VJ, Halpern EF, Hess CP, Schiebler ML, Weiss CR (2020) Assessing radiology research on artificial intelligence: a brief guide for authors, reviewers, and readers from the radiology editorial board. Radiology 294(3):487–489

    Google Scholar 

  • Boca I, Ciurea AI, Ciortea CA, Dudea SM (2021) Pros and cons for automated breast ultrasound (ABUS): a narrative review. J Person Med 11(8):703

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkett BJ, Hanemann CW (2016) A review of supplemental screening ultrasound for breast cancer: certain populations of women with dense breast tissue may benefit. Acad Radiol 23:1604–1609

    Google Scholar 

  • Byra M, Styczynski G, Szmigielski C et al (2018) Transfer learning with deep convolutional neural network for liver steatosis assessment in ultrasound images. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 13(12):1895–1903

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai L, Gao J, Zhao D (2020) A review of the application of deep learning in medical image classification and segmentation. Ann Transl Med 8(11):15

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao X, Chen H, Li Y, Peng Y, Zhou Y, Cheng L, Shen D (2022) Auto-DenseUNet: Searchable neural network architecture for mass segmentation in 3D automated breast ultrasound. Med Image Anal 82:102589

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang SG, Yu B, Vetterli M (2007) Adaptive wavelet thresholding for image denoising and compression. IEEE Trans Image Process 9:1532–1546

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chang RF, Chang-Chien KC, Takada E et al (2010) Rapid image stitching and computer-aided detection for multipass automated breast ultrasound. Med Phys 37(5):2063–2073

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang JM, Cha JH, Park JS, Kim SJ, Moon WK (2015) Automated Breast Ultrasound System (ABUS): reproducibility of massclocalization, size measurement, and characterization on serial examinations. Acta Radiol 56:1163–1170

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng H, Shan J, Ju W, Guo Y, Zhang L (2010) Automated breast cancer detection and classification using ultrasound images: A survey. Pattern Recogn 43(1):299–317

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Z, Li Y, Chen H, Zhang Z, Pan P, Cheng L (2022) DSGMFFN: deepest semantically guided multi-scale feature fusion network for automated lesion segmentation in ABUS images. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 221:106891

  • Cherkassky V, Mulier FM (2007) Learning from data: concepts, theory, and methods. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chiang T, Huang Y, Chen R, Huang C, Chang R (2019) Tumor detection in automated breast ultrasound using 3-D CNN and prioritized candidate aggregation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 38(1):240–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole EB, Zhang Z, Marques HS, Hendrick RE, Yaffe MJ, Pisano ED (2014) Impact of computer-aided detection systems on radiologist accuracy with digital mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203(4):909

    Google Scholar 

  • Coupé P, Hellier P, Kervrann C, Barillot C (2009) Nonlocal means-based specklefiltering for ultrasound images. IEEE Trans Image Process 18(10):2221–2229

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • D’Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB et al (2013) ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, breast imaging reporting and data system. American College of Radiology, Reston.

  • Dabov K, Foi A, Katkovnik V, Egiazarian K (2007) Image denoising by sparse 3D transform-domain collaborative filtering. IEEE Trans Image Process 16(8):1–16

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Deng L, Yu D (2014) Deep learning: methods and applications. Found Trends Signal Process 7(3–4):197–387

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Doi K (2007) Computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging: historical review, current status and future potential. Comput Med Imaging Graph 31(4–5):198–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Elad M, Aharon M (2006) Image denoising via sparse and redundant representations over learned dictionaries. IEEE Trans Image Process 15(12):3545–3736

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Elmore JG, Carney PA (2004) Computer-aided detection of breast cancer: has promise outstripped performance? J Natl Cancer Inst 96(3):162–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayyaz H, Kozegar E, Tan T, Soryani M (2021) Mass segmentation in automated 3-D Breast ultrasound using dual-path U-net. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.08330.

  • Gao J, Jiang Q, Zhou B, Chen D (2019) Convolutional neural networks for computer- aided detection or diagnosis in medical image analysis: an overview. Math Biosci Eng 16(6):6536–6561

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • GE HealthCare (2023) Invenia ABUS. https://www.gehealthcare.com/products/ultrasound/breast-ultrasound/invenia-abus. Accessed February 13, 2023

  • George J, Skaria S, Varun VV (2018) Using YOLO based deep learning network for real time detection and localization of lung nodules from low dose CT scans. In: Paper presented at the Medical Imaging 2018: Computer-Aided Diagnosis, 10575, 105751

  • Giger ML, Chan HP, Boone J (2008) Anniversary paper: history and status of CAD and quantitative image analysis: the role of medical physics and AAPM. Med Phys 35(12):5799–5820

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossfeld B (2017) A simple way to understand machine learning vs deep learning. Zendesk (blog), July, 18

  • Grubstein A, Rapson Y, Gadiel I, Cohen M (2017) Analysis of false†negative readings of automated breast ultrasound studies. J Clin Ultrasound 45(5):245–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Golatta M, Baggs C, Schweitzer-Martin M et al (2015) Evaluation of an automated breast 3D-ultrasound system by comparing it with hand-held ultrasound (HHUS) and mammography. Arch Gynecol Obstet 291:889–895

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamet P, Tremblay J (2017) Artificial intelligence in medicine. Metabolism 69:S36–S40

    Google Scholar 

  • Han S, Kang H, Jeong J et al (2017) A deep learning framework for supporting the classification of breast lesions in ultrasound images. Phys Med Biol 62(19):7714–7728

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbeck N, Gnant M (2017) Breast cancer. Lancet 389(10074):1134–1150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31891-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendriks GAGM, Hollnder B, Menssen J, Milkowski A, Hansen HHG, De Korte CL (2016) Automated 3D ultrasound elastography of the breast: a phantom validation study. Phys Med Biol 61:2665–2679

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang G, Liu Z, Van Der Maaten L, Weinberger KQ (2017) Densely connected convolutional networks. In: Paper presented at the Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp 4700–4708

  • Huang Q, Zhang F, Li X (2018) Machine learning in ultrasound computer-aided diagnostic systems: a survey. BioMed Res Int 2018.

  • Iranmakani S, Mortezazadeh T, Sajadian F, Ghaziani MF, Ghafari A, Khezerloo D, Musa AE (2020) A review of various modalities in breast imaging: technical aspects and clinical outcomes. Egyp J Radiol Nucl Med 51(1):1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalalian A, Mashohor SB, Mahmud HR, Saripan MIB, Ramli ARB, Karasfi B (2013) Computer-aided detection/diagnosis of breast cancer in mammography and ultrasound: a review. Clin Imaging 37(3):420–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalalian A, Mashohor S, Mahmud R, Karasfi B, Saripan MIB, Ramli ARB (2017) Foundation and methodologies in computer-aided diagnosis systems for breast cancer detection. EXCLI J 16:113

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan SS (2014) Automated whole breast ultrasound. Radiol Clin N Am 52:539–546

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen JD, Keen JM, Keen JE (2018) Utilization of computer-aided detection for digital screening mammography in the United States, 2008 to 2016. J Am Coll Radiol 15(1):44–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall A, Gal Y, Cipolla R (2018) Multi-task learning using uncertainty to weigh losses for scene geometry and semantics. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 7482–7491

  • Kim KH, Choi SH, Park S (2018) Improving arterial spin labeling by using deep learning. Radiology 287(2):658–666

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim SH (2019) Image quality and artifacts in automated breast ultrasonography. Ultrasonography 38(1):83

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim SH, Kim HH, Moon WK (2020) Automated breast ultrasound screening for dense breasts. Korean J Radiol 21(1):15–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim D, Park H, Jang M, Lee KJ (2022) Mask Branch Network: Weakly Supervised Branch Network with a Template Mask for Classifying Masses in 3D Automated Breast Ultrasound. Appl Sci 12(13):6332

  • Kohli A, Jha S (2018) Why CAD failed in mammography. J Am Coll Radiol 15(3):535–537

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruger RP, Townes JR, Hall DL, Dwyer SJ, Lodwick GS (1972) Automated radiographic diagnosis via feature extraction and classification of cardiac size and shape descriptors. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 3:174–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruger RP, Thompson WB, Turner AF (1974) Computer diagnosis of pneumoconiosis. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 1:40–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozegar E, Soryani M, Behnam H, Salamati M, Tan T (2017a) Breast cancer detection in automated 3D breast ultrasound using iso-contours and cascaded RUSBoosts. Ultrasonics 79:68–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozegar E, Soryani M, Behnam H, Salamati M, Tan T (2017b) Mass segmentation in automated 3-D breast ultrasound using adaptive region growing and supervised edge-based deformable model. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 37(4):918–928

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozegar E, Soryani M, Behnam H, Salamati M, Tan T (2020) Computer aided detection in automated 3-D breast ultrasound images: a survey. Artif Intell Rev 53(3):1919–1941

    Google Scholar 

  • Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE (2012) Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: Paper presented at the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp 1097–1105

  • Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE (2017) Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Commun ACM 60(6):84–90

  • Lee CY, Chang TF, Chou YH, Yang KC (2020) Fully automated lesion segmentation and visualization in automated whole breast ultrasound (ABUS) images. Quant Imaging Med Surg 10(3):568

    Google Scholar 

  • Lei B, Huang S, Li R, Bian C, Li H, Chou YH, Cheng JZ (2018) Segmentation of breast anatomy for automated whole breast ultrasound images with boundary regularized convolutional encoder–decoder network. Neurocomputing 321:178–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Lei Y, Yao J, He X et al. (2020a) Deep learning-based breast tumor detection and segmentation in 3D ultrasound image. In: Medical Imaging 2020a: Ultrasonic Imaging and Tomography. International Society for Optics and Photonics, vol 11319, p 113190

  • Lei Y, He X, Yao J et al (2021) Breast tumor segmentation in 3D automatic breast ultrasound using Mask scoring R CNN. Med Phys 48(1):204–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Lei B, Huang S, Li H, Li R, Bian C, Chou YH, Qin J, Zhou P, Gong X, Cheng JZ (2020b) Self-co- attention neural network for anatomy segmentation in whole breast ultrasound. Med Image Anal 64:101753

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Khanal B, Hou B et al. (2018) Standard plane detection in 3d fetal ultrasound using an iterative transformation network. In: Paper presented at the International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pp 392–400

  • Li Y, Wu W, Chen H, Cheng L, Wang S (2020) 3D tumor detection in automated breast ultrasound using deep convolutional neural networks. Med Phys 47(11):5669–5680

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin TY, Goyal P, Girshick R, He K, Dollár P (2017) Focal loss for dense object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pp 2980–2988

  • Linver MN (2008) Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. Breast Dis 18:364–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu F, Jang H, Kijowski R, Bradshaw T, McMillan AB (2018) Deep learning MR imaging-based attenuation correction for PET/MR imaging. Radiology 286(2):676–684

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo C, Chen R, Chang Y et al (2014) Multi-dimensional tumor detection in automated whole breast ultrasound using topographic watershed. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 33(7):1503–1511

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodwick GS, Haun CL, Smith WE, Keller RF, Robertson ED (1963) Computer diagnosis of primary bone tumors: a preliminary report. Radiology 80(2):273–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Loh Guan Lye Specialist Centre. Invenia ABUS Automated Breast Ultrasound System. http://www.lohguanlye.com/fa-invenia-abus-automated-breast-ultrasound.php. Accessed February 13, 2023

  • Long J, Shelhamer E, Darrell T (2015) Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. In: Paper presented at the Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp 3431–3440

  • Malekmohammadi A, Barekatrezaei S, Kozegar E, Soryani M (2023) Mass detection in automated 3-D breast ultrasound using a patch bi-convlstm network. Ultrasonics 129:106891

  • Mansoor A, Bagci U, Foster B et al (2015) Segmentation and image analysis of abnormal lungs at CT: current approaches, challenges, and future trends. Radiographics 35(4):1056–1076

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin LJ, Melnichouk O, Guo H, Chiarelli AM, Hislop TG, Yaffe MJ, Minkin S, Hopper JL, Boyd NF (2010) Family history, mammographic density, and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 19:456–463

    Google Scholar 

  • McBee MP, Awan OA, Colucci AT, Ghobadi CW, Kadom N, Kansagra AP et al (2018) Deep learning in radiology. Acad Radiol 25(11):1472–1480

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers PH, Nice CM Jr, Becker HC, Nettleton WJ Jr, Sweeney JW, Meckstroth GR (1964) Automated computer analysis of radiographic images. Radiology 83(6):1029–1034

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon WK, Huang Y, Hsu C et al (2020) Computer-aided tumor detection in automated breast ultrasound using a 3-D convolutional neural network. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 190:105360

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon WK, Lo C, Chen R et al (2014) Tumor detection in automated breast ultrasound images using quantitative tissue clustering. Med Phys 41(4):042901

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon WK, Shen YW, Bae MS, Huang CS, Chen JH, Chang RF (2012) Computer-aided tumor detection based on multi-scale blob detection algorithm in automated breast ultrasound images. IEEE Trans Med Imagingg 32(7):1191–1200

    Google Scholar 

  • Muramatsu C, Hiramatsu Y, Fujita H, Kobayashi H (2018) Mass detection on automated breast ultrasound volume scans using convolutional neural networks. In: 2018 International Workshop on Advanced Image Technology (IWAIT), pp 1–2

  • Nair T, Precup D, Arnold DL, Arbel T (2020) Exploring uncertainty measures in deep networks for multiple sclerosis lesion detection and segmentation. Med Image Anal 59:101557

    Google Scholar 

  • Ou WC, Polat D, Dogan BE (2021) Deep learning in breast radiology: current progress and future directions. Eur Radiol 31(7):4872–4885

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan P, Chen H, Li Y, Cai N, Cheng L, Wang S (2021) Tumor segmentation in automated whole breast ultrasound using bidirectional LSTM neural network and attention mechanism. Ultrasonics 110:106271

    Google Scholar 

  • Philpotts LE (2009) Can computer-aided detection be detrimental to mammographic interpretation?. Radiology 253(1):17–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramamoorthy SA, Gopi VP (2021) Breast ultrasound image processing. In: Raj A, Mahesh V, Nersisson R (eds) Handbook of research on deep learning-based image analysis under constrained and unconstrained environments. IGI Global, Harrisburg, pp 44–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Redmon J, Farhadi A (2016) YOLO9000: better, faster, stronger. arXiv e-prints arXiv: 1612.08242.

  • Rella R, Belli P, Giuliani M et al (2018) Automated breast ultrasonography (ABUS) in the screening and diagnostic setting: Indications and practical use. Acad Radiol 25(11):1457–1470

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez JH, Fraile FJC, Conde MJR, Llorente PLG (2016) Computer aided detection and diagnosis in medical imaging: a review of clinical and educational applications. In: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on technological ecosystems for enhancing multiculturality, pp 517–524

  • Rodriguez-Ruiz A, Teuwen J, Chung K, Karssemeijer, N, Chevalier M, Gubern-Merida A, Sechopoulos I (2018) Pectoral muscle segmentation in breast tomosynthesis with deep learning. In: Medical Imaging 2018: Computer-Aided Diagnosis, vol 10575, pp 564–570

  • Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T (2015) U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Paper presented at the International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pp 234–241

  • Russakovsky O, Deng J, Su H et al (2015) Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge. Int J Comput Vision 115(3):211–252

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Shen D, Wu G, Suk H (2017) Deep learning in medical image analysis. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 19:221–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonyan K, Zisserman A (2015) Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. In: 3rd International Conference Learning Represent. ICLR 2015-Conference Track Proceeding pp 1–14

  • Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA (1995) Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 196(1):123–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki K (2012) A review of computer-aided diagnosis in thoracic and colonic imaging. Quant Imaging Med Surgery 2(3):163

    Google Scholar 

  • Szegedy C, Vanhoucke V, Ioffe S, Shlens J, Wojna Z (2016) Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 2818–2826

  • Takahashi R, Kajikawa Y (2017) Computer-aided diagnosis: a survey with bibliometric analysis. Int J Med Informatics 101:58–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan T, Mordang J, van Zelst J et al (2015) Computer aided detection of breast cancers using haar†like features in automated 3D breast ultrasound. Med Phys 42(4):1498–1504

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan T, Platel B, Mus R, Karssemeijer N (2012) Detection of breast cancer in automated 3D breast ultrasound. In: Paper presented at the Medical Imaging 2012: Computer-Aided Diagnosis, vol 8315, pp 831505

  • Tan T, Platel B, Mus R, Tabar L, Mann RM, Karssemeijer N (2013) Computer- aided detection of cancer in automated 3-D breast ultrasound. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 32(9):1698–1706

    Google Scholar 

  • The Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) (2022) Breast cancer. https://www.uicc.org/what-we-do/thematic-areas-work/breast-cancer. Accessed March 17, 2022

  • Toriwaki JI, Suenaga Y, Negoro T, Fukumura T (1973) Pattern recognition of chest X- ray images. Comput Graphics Image Process 2(3–4):252–271

    Google Scholar 

  • van Zelst JC, Mann RM (2018) Automated three-dimensional breast US for screening: Technique, artifacts, and lesion characterization. Radiographics 38(3):663–683

    Google Scholar 

  • Vourtsis A, Kachulis A (2018) The performance of 3D ABUS versus HHUS in the visualisation and BI-RADS characterisation of breast lesions in a large cohort of 1,886 women. Eur Radiol 28(2):592–601

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang N, Bian C, Wang Y et al. (2018) Densely deep supervised networks with threshold loss for cancer detection in automated breast ultrasound. In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pp 641–648

  • Wang S, Liu J, Zhu Z, Eisenbrey J (2019a) Artificial intelligence in ultrasound imaging: current research and applications. Adv Ultrasound Diagnosis Therapy 3(3):53–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Guo Y, Wang Y (2015) Automatic tumor detection in automated 3-D breast ultrasound using local phase information. In: Paper presented at the 2015 8th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics (BMEI), pp 68–72

  • Wang Y, Choi EJ, Choi Y, Zhang H, Jin GY, Ko SB (2020a) Breast cancer classification in automated breast ultrasound using multiview convolutional neural network with transfer learning. Ultrasound Med Biol 46(5):1119–1132

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Wang N, Xu M et al (2019b) Deeply supervised networks with threshold loss for cancer detection in automated breast ultrasound. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 39(4):866–876

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Qin C, Lin C et al (2020b) 3D inception U net with asymmetric loss for cancer detection in automated breast ultrasound. Med Phys 47(11):5582–5591

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Nasief HG, Kohn S, Milkowski A, Clary T, Barnes S, Barbone PE, Hall TJ (2017) Three-dimensional ultrasound elasticity imaging on an automated breast volume scanning system. Ultrason Imaging 39:369–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Winsberg F, Elkin M, Macy J Jr, Bordaz V, Weymouth W (1967) Detection of radiographic abnormalities in mammograms by means of optical scanning and computer analysis. Radiology 89(2):211–215

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO) (2022) Breast cancer. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/breast-cancer. Accessed March 17, 2022.

  • Xiang H, Huang YS, Lee CH, Chien TYC, Lee CK, Chang RF (2021) 3-D Res-CapsNet convolutional neural network on automated breast ultrasound tumor diagnosis. Eur J Radiol 138:109608

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamashita R, Nishio M, Do RKG, Togashi K (2018) Convolutional neural networks: an overview and application in radiology. Insights Imaging 9(4):611–629

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu T, Liu P, Peng Y, Liu J, Yin H, Liu DC (2019) Slice localization for three- dimensional breast ultrasound volume using deep learning. Destech Trans Eng Technol Res 15:251–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanotel M, Bednarova I, Londero V, Linda A, Lorenzon M, Girometti R, Zuiani C (2018) Automated breast ultrasound: basic principles and emerging clinical applications. Radiol Med 123:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Li Y, Wu W, Chen H, Cheng L, Wang S (2021) Tumor detection using deep learning method in automated breast ultrasound. Biomed Signal Process Control 68:102677

  • Zhuang Z, Ding W, Zhuang S, Raj ANJ, Wang J, Zhou W, Wei C (2021) Tumor classification in automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) based on a modified extracting feature network. Comput Med Imaging Graph 90: 101925

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang Z, Liu G, Ding W, Raj ANJ, Qiu S, Guo J, Yuan Y (2020) Cardiac VFM visualization and analysis based on YOLO deep learning model and modified 2D continuity equation. Comput Med Imaging Graph 82: 101732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compmedimag.2020.101732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Chen H, Li Y et al (2021a) Multi-task learning for segmentation and classification of tumors in 3D automated breast ultrasound images. Med Image Anal 70: 101918

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Chen H, Li Y, Cao X, Wang S, Shen D (2021b) Cross-model attention-guided tumor segmentation for 3D automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) images. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 26(1):301–311

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support received from the Universiti Putra Malaysia under IPS Grants (Vot Numbers: GP-IPS/2018/9665600).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer & Communication Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University Putra Malaysia (UPM), 43400, Serdang, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia

    Dayangku Nur Faizah Pengiran Mohamad, Syamsiah Mashohor & Marsyita Hanafi

  2. Radiology Department, Faculty of Medicine & Health Science, University Putra Malaysia (UPM), 43400, Serdang, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia

    Rozi Mahmud & Norafida Bahari

Authors
  1. Dayangku Nur Faizah Pengiran Mohamad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Syamsiah Mashohor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rozi Mahmud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marsyita Hanafi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Norafida Bahari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Not applicable.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Syamsiah Mashohor.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pengiran Mohamad, D.N.F., Mashohor, S., Mahmud, R. et al. Transition of traditional method to deep learning based computer-aided system for breast cancer using Automated Breast Ultrasound System (ABUS) images: a review. Artif Intell Rev 56, 15271–15300 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10511-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10511-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation