Skip to main content
Log in

Commentary on “Ever Since Hightower: The Politics of Agricultural Research Activism in the Molecular Age”

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • L. Busch W. B Lacy (1983) Science, , Agriculture, and the Politics of Research Westview Press Boulder, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Cochrane (1993) The Development of American Agriculture University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis, Minnesota

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, W. (2000). “American Agriculture in an Uncertain Global Economy.” Minnesota Agricultural Economist Spring.

  • D. B. Danbom (1979) The Resisted Revolution Iowa State University Press Ames, Iowa

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Frey (1996) National Plant Breeding Study – I: Human and Financial Resources Devoted to Plant Breeding Research and Development in the United States in 1994 Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station Ames, Iowa

    Google Scholar 

  • C. M. Hardin (1955) Freedom in Agricultural Education University of Chicago Press Chicago, Illinois

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Hightower (1973) Hard Tomatoes, Hard Times Schenckman Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • R. S. Kirkendall (1966) Social Scientists and Farm Politics in the Age of Roosevelt University of Missouri Press Columbia, Missouri

    Google Scholar 

  • J. R. Kloppenburg SuffixJr. (1988) First the Seed: The Political Economy of Plant Biotechnology, 1492–2000 Cambridge University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Lacy L. Busch (1982) The institutional and professional context for rural sociology Don Dillman Daryl Hobbs (Eds) Rural Society in the US: Issues for the 1980s Westview Press Boulder, Colorado 404–413

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameNational Research Council (1972) Report of the Committee on Research Advisory to the U.S. Department of Agriculture NTIS, PB 213 338 Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • E. M. Rogers (1995) Diffusion of Innovations Free Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • C. E. Rosenberg (1976) No Other Gods Johns Hopkins Press Baltimore, Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  • C. E. Rosenberg (1977) ArticleTitleRationalization and reality in the shaping of American agricultural research 1875–1914 Social Studies of Science 7 401–422

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Wasserman (1972) Harvey Wasserman’s History of the United States Harper and Row New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lawrence Busch.

Additional information

Lawrence Busch is University Distinguished Professor of Sociology and Director of the Institute for Food and Agricultural Standards at Michigan State University. His current work focuses on the role of third party certification of food and agricultural products.

In his last paper before his untimely death, Fred Buttel revisited an issue with which he had long been concerned: the politics of activism surrounding agricultural research. In this document I shall attempt to reply to Fred. I shall not rehash the issues he raises, but rather will note points in his paper that I believe need to be clarified or expanded upon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Busch, L. Commentary on “Ever Since Hightower: The Politics of Agricultural Research Activism in the Molecular Age”. Agric Hum Values 22, 285–288 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-005-6044-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-005-6044-2

Keywords

Navigation