Abstract
Advances in Health Sciences Education (AHSE) has been at the forefront of the cognitive wave in health professions education for the past 25 years. One example is research on productive failure, a teaching strategy that asks learners to attempt to generate solutions to difficult problems before receiving instruction. This study compared the effectiveness of productive failure with indirect failure to further characterize the underpinning cognitive mechanisms of productive failure. Year one pharmacy students (N = 42) were randomly assigned to a productive failure or an indirect failure learning condition. The problem of estimating renal function based on serum creatinine was described to participants in the productive failure learning condition, who were then asked to generate a solution. Participants in the indirect failure condition learned about the same problem and were given incorrect solutions that other students had created, as well as the Cockcroft–Gault formula, and asked to compare and contrast the equations. Immediately thereafter all participants completed a series of tests designed to assess acquisition, application, and preparation for future learning (PFL). The tests were repeated after a 1-week delay. Participants in the productive failure condition outperformed those in the indirect failure condition, both on the immediate PFL assessment, and after a 1-week delay. These results emphasize the crucial role of generation in learning. When preparing novice students to learn new knowledge in the future, generating solutions to problems prior to instruction may be more effective than simply learning about someone else’s mistakes. Struggle and failure are most productive when experienced personally by a learner because it requires the learner to engage in generation, which deepens conceptual understanding.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 185–205). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2014). Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. In M. Gernsbacher & J. Pomerantz (Eds.), Psychology and the real world: Essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society (pp. 56–64). New York: Worth.
Bjork, R. A. (1975). Retrieval as a memory modifier: An interpretation of negative recency & related phenomena. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium (pp. 123–144). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (2019). Forgetting as the friend of learning: Implications for teaching and self-regulated learning. Advances in Physiology Education, 43(2), 164–167.
Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Schmidt, H. G. (1992). On the role of biomedical knowledge in clinical reasoning by experts, intermediates and novices. Cognitive Science, 16(2), 153–184.
Cleland, J., Varpio, L., Driessen, E., & Wilkinson, T. (2018). Lesson Learned: progressing knowledge by intelligently considering failures. Paper presented at the AMEE, Basel, Switzerland.
Cockcroft, D. W., & Gault, M. H. (1976). Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron, 16, 31–41.
Edmondson, A. (2011). Strategies of learning from failure. Harvard Business Review, 89, 48–55.
Eva, K. W. (2018). Cognitive influences on complex performance assessment: Lessons from the interplay between medicine and psychology. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 7(2), 177–188.
Eva, K. W., & Regehr, G. (2011). Exploring the divergence between self-assessment and self-monitoring. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 16(3), 311–329.
Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1986). Two courses of expertise. In H. W. Stevenson, H. E. Azuma, & K. E. Hakuta (Eds.), Child development and education in Japan (pp. 262–272). New York, NY: W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co.
Kapur, M. (2008). Productive failure. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 379–424.
Kapur, M. (2014a). Comparing learning from productive failure and vicarious failure. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(4), 651–677.
Kapur, M. (2014b). Productive failure in learning math. Cognitive Science, 38, 1008–1022.
Kapur, M. (2016). Examining productive failure, productive success, unproductive failure, and unproductive success in Learning. Educational Psychologist, 51, 289–299.
Kawamura, A., Harris, I., Thomas, K., Mema, B., & Mylopoulos, M. (2020). Exploring how pediatric residents develop adaptive expertise in communication: The importance of “shifts” in understanding patient and family perspectives. Academic Medicine, 95(7), 1066–1072.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75–86.
Klasen, J. M., & Lingard, L. A. (2019). Allowing failure for educational purposes in postgraduate clinical training: A narrative review. Medical Teacher, 41(11), 1263–1269. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2019.1630728.
Mylopoulos, M., & Farhat, W. (2015). “I can do better”: Exploring purposeful improvement in daily clinical work. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 20(2), 371–383.
Mylopoulos, M., Kulasegaram, K., & Woods, N. N. (2018). Developing the experts we need: Fostering adaptive expertise through education. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 24(3), 674–677.
Mylopoulos, M., Lohfeld, L., Norman, G. R., Dhaliwal, G., & Eva, K. W. (2012). Renowned physicians’ perceptions of expert diagnostic practice. Academic Medicine, 87(10), 1413–1417.
Mylopoulos, M., & Woods, N. N. (2014). Preparing medical students for future learning using basic science instruction. Medical Education, 48, 667–673.
Norman, G. (2013). The third wave in health sciences education. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 18(3), 319–322.
Norman, G., Sherbino, J., Dore, K., Wood, T., Young, M., Gaissmaier, W., & Monteiro, S. (2014). The etiology of diagnostic errors: A controlled trial of system 1 versus system 2 reasoning. Academic Medicine, 89(2), 277–284.
Norman, G. R., Monteiro, S. D., Sherbino, J., Ilgen, J. S., Schmidt, H. G., & Mamede, S. (2017). The causes of errors in clinical reasoning: Cognitive biases, knowledge deficits, and dual process thinking. Academic Medicine, 92(1), 23–30.
Payne, D. G., Neely, J. H., & Burns, D. J. (1986). The generation effect: Further tests of the lexical activation hypothesis. Memory & Cognition, 14(3), 246–252.
Reeve, J. (2002). Self-determination theory applied to educational settings. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 183–203). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
Rosner, Z. A., Elman, J. A., & Shimamura, A. P. (2013). The generation effect: activating broad neural circuits during memory encoding. Cortex; A Journal DEVOTED to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 49(7), 1901–1909.
Schmidt, H. G., & Rikers, R. M. (2007). How expertise develops in medicine: knowledge encapsulation and illness script formation. Medical Education, 41(12), 1133–1139.
Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992). New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science, 3, 207–217.
Schwartz, D., & Martin, T. (2004). Inventing to prepare for future learning: The hidden efficiency of encouraging original student production in statistics instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 129–184.
Slamecka, N. J., & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4(6), 592–604.
Soderstrom, N. C., & Bjork, R. A. (2015). Learning versus performance: An integrative review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(2), 176–199.
Steenhof, N., Woods, N. N., Van Gerven, P. W. M., & Mylopoulos, M. (2019). Productive failure as an instructional approach to promote future learning. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 24(4), 739–749.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285.
Woods, N. N., Brooks, L. R., & Norman, G. R. (2007). It all make sense: Biomedical knowledge, causal connections and memory in the novice diagnostician. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 12(4), 405–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-006-9055-x.
Young, M. (2019). The utility of failure: A taxonomy for research and scholarship. Perspectives on Medical Education, 8(6), 365–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-00551-6.
Yudkowsky, R., Otaki, J., Lowenstein, T., Riddle, J., Nishigori, H., & Bordage, G. (2009). A hypothesis-driven physical examination learning and assessment procedure for medical students: Initial validity evidence. Medical Education, 43(8), 729–740.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Steenhof, N., Woods, N.N. & Mylopoulos, M. Exploring why we learn from productive failure: insights from the cognitive and learning sciences. Adv in Health Sci Educ 25, 1099–1106 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-020-10013-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-020-10013-y