Skip to main content
Log in

The role of subject presence type on student motivation in a PBL learning environment

  • Published:
Advances in Health Sciences Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Students have been observed as underprepared or skipping steps during the problem-based learning (PBL) process due to fatigue or low motivation, potentially creating a barrier for effective learning. One way to explore resolving this issue is to consider whether variables of problem scenario design can be altered to optimize motivation. This mixed method study considered the impact of presentation modality of the PBL problem subject (i.e., the key character involved in the problem) on student motivation within the context of Speech and Voice Science curricula for forty-six undergraduate students at a midwestern, US university. The frequency of verbal and non-verbal engagement behaviors was monitored during four consecutive PBL problems. The problems were designed to provide increasing levels of social presence and used varied case presentation modalities (e.g., paper, audio-visual, face to face). Although the frequency of engagement behaviors declined during the study and fatigue appeared to play a role, most students identified problems with combination of higher subject presence (i.e., audio-visual, face-to-face) and challenging content as motivating. Students were able to develop a sense of ownership and responsibility for their problem-solving efforts with a problem designed with direct interaction (i.e., face to face) with the problem subject. This study sheds light on the impact of affective problem features (e.g., emotion, personal psychological connection) on students’ motivation in the presence of fatigue, which is often undervalued during the design of PBL modules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albanese, M. A., & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-based learning: A review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Academic Medicine, 68(1), 52–81. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199301000-00012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balslev, T., De Grave, W. S., Muijtjens, A. M., & Scherpbier, A. J. (2005). Comparison of text and video cases in a postgraduate problem-based learning format. Medical Education, 39, 1086–1092. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02314.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, T., Cashman, D., & Moore, S. (2011). Designing problems and triggers in different media: Challenging all students. In T. Barrett & S. Moore (Eds.), New approaches in problem-based learning: Revitalising your practice in higher education (pp. 18–35). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrows, H. S. (1986). A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods. Medical Education, 20, 481–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1986.tb01386.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrows, H. S. (1996). Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. In L. Wilkerson & W. H. Gijselaers (Eds.), Bring problem-based learning to higher education: Theory and practice (pp. 3–12). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czabanowska, K., Moust, J. H., Meijer, A., Schröder-Bäck, P., & Roebertsen, H. (2012). Problem-based learning revisited, introduction of active and self-directed learning to reduce fatigue among students. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 9(1), 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dammers, J., Spencer, J., & Thomas, M. (2001). Using real patients in problem-based learning: Students’ comments on the value of using real, as opposed to paper cases, in a problem-based learning module in general practice. Medical Education, 35, 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2001.00841.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Wolfhagen, I. H. A. P., van der Vleuten, C. P. M., & Wijnen, W. H. F. W. (2001). Solving problems with group work in problem-based learning: Hold on to the philosophy. Medical Education, 35, 884–889. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00915.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hixon, T., Weismer, G., & Hoit, J. (2014). Preclinical speech science: Anatomy, physiology, acoustics, perception (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2015). The learning space in problem-based learning. In A. E. Walker, H. Leary, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, & P. A. Ertmer (Eds.), Essential readings in problem-based learning: Exploring the legacy of Howard S. Barrows (pp. 5–15). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo-Silver, C., & Eberbach, C. (2012). Learning theories and problem-based Learning. In S. Bridges, C. McGrath, & T. L. Whitehill (Eds.), Problem-based learning in clinical education: The next generation (pp. 3–20). Dordrecht: Springer. (electronic resource).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, W. (2006). The 3C3R model: A conceptual framework or designing problems in PBL. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 55–77. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, W. (2016). All PBL starts here: The problem. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, W. (2019). Problem design in PBL. In M. Moallem, W. Hung, & N. Dabbagh (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of problem-based learning (pp. 249–272). Boston: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, W., Mehl, K., & Holen, J. (2013). The relationship between problem design and learning process in problem-based learning environments: Two cases. The Asia-Pacific Researcher, 22(4), 635–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0066-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, W., Flom, E., Manu, J., & Mahmoud, E. (2015). A review of the instructional practices for promoting online learning communities. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 26(3), 229–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H., & Hung, W. (2008). All problems are not equal: Implications for problem-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning. https://doi.org/10.77771/1541-5015.1080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, N. P., & Beagan, B. L. (2004). The patient as text: A challenge for problem-based learning. Medical Education, 38, 1071–1079. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01956.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Li, Q., Li, J., Chen, M., Xie, H., Li, Y., et al. (2013). Comparison of three problem-based learning conditions (real patients, digital, and paper) with lecture-based learning in a dermatology course: A prospective randomized study from China. Medical Teacher, 35(2), e963–e3970. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.719651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S., & Bierema, L. (2014). Adult learning: Linking theory and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moust, J. H. C., van Berkel, H. J. M., & Schmidt, H. G. (2005). Signs of erosion: Reflections on three decades of problem-based learning at Maastricht University. Higher Education, 50, 665–668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6371-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, G. R., & Schmidt, H. G. (1992). The psychological basis of problem-based learning: A review of the evidence. Academic Medicine, 67(9), 557–565. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199209000-00002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, K., Moran, B., Haidet, P., Seidel, C., Schneider, V., Morgan, R., et al. (2003). Validation of an observation instrument for measuring student engagement in health professions settings. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 26(1), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/016327870225009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149–172). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savery, J. R. (2015). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. In A. E. Walker, H. Leary, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, & P. A. Ertmer (Eds.), Essential readings in problem-based learning: Exploring the legacy of Howard S. Barrows (pp. 5–15). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H. G. (1983). Problem-based learning: rationale and description. Medical Education, 17(1), 11–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H. G., Rotgans, J. I., & Yew, E. J. (2011). The process of problem-based learning: What works and why. Medical Education, 45(8), 792–806. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04035.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, B. Y., Choi, I., Choi, S., Kim, T., Roh, H., Rhee, B. D., et al. (2016). Using standardized patients versus video cases for representing clinical problems in problem-based learning. Korean Journal of Medical Education, 28(2), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elaine Pyle.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix A

figure a

Graphic representation of 2nd generation 3C3R Problem Design Model (Hung 2019). To appear in M. Moallem, W. Hung, & N. Dabbagh (Eds.), The Wiley Handbook of Problem-based Learning. Boston: Wiley.

Appendix B

figure b

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pyle, E., Hung, W. The role of subject presence type on student motivation in a PBL learning environment. Adv in Health Sci Educ 24, 643–663 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-019-09889-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-019-09889-2

Keywords

Navigation