Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

“User Involvement Is a Sine Qua Non, Almost, in Medical Education”: Learning with Rather than Just About Health and Social Care Service Users

  • Published:
Advances in Health Sciences Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the General Medical Council emphasising the value of service users to medical students’ education, there is scant literature about service user involvement in medical education. Although some research has outlined the effectiveness of service users as teachers, none has explored social issues surrounding how medical students learn ‘with’ rather than just ‘about’ service users. Incorporating insights from contemporary socio-cultural learning theory, this study examines the views and experiences of 47 stakeholders (comprising 19 service users, 13 medical students and 15 medical educators) concerning service user involvement in medical education. Eight audiotaped focus group discussions were convened and the audiotapes were transcribed. The transcripts and audiotapes were independently analysed by multiple researchers using Framework analysis. Seven content- and five process-orientated themes emerged from the analysis. Content-related themes included the costs and benefits of service user involvement in medical education and process-related themes included the use and function of humour and metaphor. In this paper, we focus primarily on the content-related themes. We discuss these findings in light of the existing service user involvement literature and contemporary socio-cultural learning theory and provide implications for further research and educational practice. We encourage educators to involve service users in medical education but only in a considered way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barbour R.S. (2005). Making sense of focus groups. Medical Education 39(7):742–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett L., Baikie K. (2003). The client as educator: learning about mental illness through the eyes of the expert. Nurse Education Today 23:104–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blasco P.A., Kohen H., Shapland C. (1999). Parents-as-teachers: design and establishment of a training programme for pediatric residents. Medical Education 33:695–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleakley A. (2006). Broadening conceptions of learning in medical education: the message from teamworking. Medical Education 40:150–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne D., Clarke L., Grant A., McGowan B. (2003). User involvement in curriculum and nursing practice development. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 10:505–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne N., Wasylenki D. (1996). Developing a social contract between the medical school and the community. Israeli Journal of Medical Sciences 32:222–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Chipp E., Stonely S., Cooper K. (2004). Clinical placements for medical students: factors affecting patients’ involvement in medical education. Medical Teacher 26:114–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cottrell D.J., McCrorie P., Perrin F. (1994). The personal tutor system: an evaluation. Medical Education 28(6):544–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crepaz-Keay D., Binns C., Wilson E. (1997). Dancing with Angels. CCETSW, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossley M.L. (2002). ‘Could you please pass one of those health leaflets along?’: exploring health, morality and resistance through focus groups. Social Science and Medicine 55:1471–1483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crotty M. (1998). The Foundations of Social Research. Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process. Allen & Unwin, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Daykin N., Rimmer J., Turton P., Evans S., Sanidas M., Tritter J., Langton H. (2002). Enhancing user involvement through interprofessional education in healthcare: the case of cancer services. Learning in Health and Social Care 1:122–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health (1999). Patient and Public Involvement in the New NHS. Department of Health, Leeds

    Google Scholar 

  • Duggleby W. (2005). What about focus group interaction data? Qualitative Health Research 15(6):832–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duman M., Farrell C. (2000). The POPPi Guide. Practicalities of Producing Patient Information. King’s Fund Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Engestrom Y. (1987). Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Orienta-Konsultit Oy, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Felton A., Stickley T. (2004). Pedagogy, power and service user involvement. Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health Nursing 11:89–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrest S., Risk I., Masters H., Brown N. (2000). Mental health service user involvement in nurse education: exploring the issues. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 7:51–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frisby R. (2001). User involvement in mental health branch education: client review presentations. Nurse Education Today 21:663–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, J, Haq, I., Cartledge, J., Worrall, J. & Dacre, J. (2002). Patient partners with back pain: results of a medical student focus group. Presented at the AMEE Conference, Lisbon, Portugal, August 2002

  • General Medical Council (2003). Tomorrow’s Doctors: Recommendations on Undergraduate Medical Education, 2nd Edition. General Medical Council, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Goss S., Miller C. (1995). From Margin to Mainstream: Developing Users and Carer Centred Community Care. Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruppen L.D., Branch V.K., Laing T.J. (1996). The use of trained patient educators with rheumatoid arthritis to teach medical students. Arthritis Care Research 9:302–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanks, W.F. (1991). Foreword by William F. Hanks. In Lave, J. & Wenger, E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

  • Hatem D.S., Gallagher D., Frankel R. (2003). Challenges and opportunities for patients with HIV who educate health professionals. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 15:98–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendry G., Schrieber L., Bryce D. (1999). Patients teach students: partners in arthritis education. Medical Education 33:674–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossack A., Wall G. (2005). Service users: undervalued and underused?. The Psychologist 18:134–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe A., Anderson J. (2003). Involving patients in medical education. British Medical Journal 327:326–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilminster S., Morris P., Simpson E., Thistlethwaite J., Ewart B. (2004). Using patients experiences in medical education: first steps in inter-professional training? In: Warne T., McAndrew S. (eds) Using Patient Experience in Nurse Education. Palgrave macmillan, Basingstoke, pp. 104–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitzinger J. (1994). The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health and Illness 16(1):103–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, L.V. & Mattick, K. (in press) “When I first came here, I thought medicine was black and white”: Making sense of medical students’ ways of knowing. Social Science and Medicine

  • Knight, L.V. & Rees, C.E. (in preparation) “Enough is enough – I don’t want any audience”: Medical students' talk about consent for patient interaction

  • Langton H., Barnes M., Haslehurst S., Rimmer J., Turton P. (2003). Collaboration, user involvement and education: a systematic review of the literature and report of an educational initiative. European Journal of Oncology Nursing 7(4):242–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave J., Wenger E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Var R.M. (2002). Patient involvement in education for enhanced quality of care. International Nursing Review 49:219–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky P.E., Branch V.K., Wortham H., Powell L., Caldwell B., Casper D. (1994). Arthritis Educator Training Manual for the Musculoskeletal Exam. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Centre, Dallas

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlewood S., Ypinazar V., Margolis S.A., Scherpbier A., Spencer J., Dornan T. (2005). Early practical experience and the social responsiveness of clinical education: systematic review. British Medical Journal 331:387–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masters H., Forrest S., Harley A., Hunter M., Brown N., Risk I. (2002). Involving mental health service users and carers in curriculum development: moving beyond ‘classroom’ involvement. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 9:309–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAndrew S., Samociuk G.A. (2003). Reflecting together: developing a new strategy for continuous user involvement in mental health nurse education. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 10:616–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan M. (1997). The doctor–patient relationship. In: Scambler G. (eds) Sociology as Applied to Medicine, 4th edition. WB Saunders, London, pp. 47–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Office for National Statistics (2005). The National Statistics Socio-economic Classification User Manual. Palgrave McMillan, Hampshire, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, C.E., Knight, L.V. & Wilkinson, C.E. (2006). Service user involvement in medical education: the benefits and costs of simulated versus real patients. Oral Paper Accepted for Presentation at the 12th International Ottawa Conference on Medical Education, Marriott Marquis Hotel, New York, 20–24th May 2006

  • Ritchie J., Spencer L. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A., Burgess R.G. (eds) Analysing Qualitative Data. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudman M.J. (1996). User involvement in the nursing curriculum: seeking users’ views. Journal of Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing 3(3):195–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheff T.J. (1966). Being Mentally Ill: A Sociological Theory. Aldine, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Scientific Software Development (2004) User’s Manual for ATLAS.ti 5.0, 2nd edition. Berlin: Scientific Software Development. http://www.atlasti.com/downloads/atlman.pdf (accessed 19th September 2005)

  • Simpson A. (1999). Creating alliances: the views of users and carers on the education and training needs of community mental health nurses. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 6:347–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer J., Blackmore D., Heard S., McCrorie P., McHaffie D., Scherpbier A., Sen Gupta T., Singh K., Southgate L. (2000). Patient-oriented learning: a review of the role of the patient in the education of medical students. Medical Education 34:851–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stacy R., Spencer J. (1999). Patients as teachers: a qualitative study of patients’ views on their role in a community-based undergraduate project. Medical Education 33:688–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn S., Schumm J.S., Sinagub J. (1996). Focus Group Interviews in Education and Psychology. Sage, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Warr D.J. (2005). “It was fun... but we don’t usually talk about these things”: analyzing sociable interaction in focus groups. Qualitative Inquiry 11(2):200–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson C.E., Rees C.E. & Knight L.V. (in preparation) “From the heart of my bottom”: An analysis of humour in focus group discussions

  • Wykurz G., Kelly D. (2002). Developing the role of patients as teachers: literature review. British Medical Journal 325:818–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

A British Academy Larger Research Grant (LRG-37523) awarded to the first author funded this research. First, we would like to thank Dr Pam Lings (previously employed as a Research Assistant at our School) for helping us to secure COREC and PMS ethics approval, conduct the focus groups, transcribe the audiotapes and analyse preliminary data. Second, we would like to thank Nicky Britten (Professor of Applied Health Care Research at our school) for her regular advice on the methodology of the research and feedback on this manuscript. Third, we would like to thank Dr Alan Bleakley (Principal Lecturer in Clinical Education at our school) for his comments on this manuscript. Finally, we would like to thank all those organisations that helped us to recruit participants and most importantly, the health and social care service users, medical students and medical educators who took part in the study.

Contributors: CR designed the study and secured its funding. CR and LK conducted the focus group discussions and all authors analysed the focus group transcripts and audiotapes. CR wrote the first draft of this manuscript but all authors contributed to its editing and revision.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. E. Rees.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rees, C.E., Knight, L.V. & Wilkinson, C.E. “User Involvement Is a Sine Qua Non, Almost, in Medical Education”: Learning with Rather than Just About Health and Social Care Service Users. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 12, 359–390 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-006-9007-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-006-9007-5

Keywords

Navigation