Abstract
Shelterbelt width not only influences protection effectiveness, but also represents a variable in a porosity model. Following extensive planting of shelterbelts globally, it is important to accurately identify shelterbelt width to evaluate its effectiveness on the regional scale. However, obtaining such an inventory is challenging given the narrow linear characteristic and extensive distribution. The development of high-resolution remote sensing monitoring offers the possibility of accurate identification of shelterbelt width. This study developed a method for identification of shelterbelt width using 3-m spatial resolution JL1–02A remote sensing imagery. The primary principles of the method are as follows: (1) generate two-dimensional waveforms of shelterbelts using remote sensing images; (2) recognize intact parts of shelterbelts from wave features in the direction of belt orientation; (3) determine the belt edge and pixels related to belt width through neighboring pixel analysis in the direction of belt width; and (4) establish an algorithm for shelterbelt width identification through analysis of its relationship with edge and inner pixels. Using the proposed method, shelterbelt width was identified in the study area in Jilin Province (Northeast China), and the accuracy of the measurement was analyzed using a 0.75-m resolution fusion image (sample number: 140). Results showed that the coefficient of determination (R2) was 0.93, root mean square error was 2.18 m, mean absolute error was 1.76 m, maximum error was 5.11 m, and minimum error was 0.01 m, which verified the accuracy and reliability of the method for shelterbelt width identification. The result could be used to determine shelterbelt structure (e.g., number of rows), thereby providing the possibility for remote simulation of shelterbelt porosity, which was previously only measured from the ground-level approach. The proposed method could help promote accurate monitoring and management of shelterbelt structure and function.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Amichev BY, Bentham MJ, Cerkowniak D, Kort J, Kulshreshtha S, Laroque CP, Piwowar JM, Van Rees KCJ (2015) Mapping and quantification of planted tree and shrub shelterbelts in Saskatchewan. Canada Agrofor Syst 89:49–65
Brandle JR, Hodges L, Zhou XH (2004) Windbreaks in North American agricultural systems. Agrofor Syst 61:65–78
Cai XL, Henderson M, Wang LG, Su YH, Liu BH (2021) Shelterbelt structure and crop protection from increased typhoon activity in Northeast China. Agriculture 11:995
Chen YY, Ming DP, Zhao L, Lv BR, Zhou KQ, Qing YZ (2018) Review on high spatial resolution remote sensing image segmentation evaluation. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 84(10):629–646
Deng RX, Li Y, Wang WJ, Zhang SW (2013) Recognition of shelterbelt continuity using remote sensing and waveform recognition. Agrofor Syst 87:827–834
Deng RX, Li Y, Xu XL, Wang WJ, Wei YC (2017) Remote estimation of shelterbelt width from SPOT5 imagery. Agrofor Syst 91(1):1–12
Deng RX, Wang WJ, Li Y, Shi XL, Wei YC, Hao LJ, Li CJ, Liu WY (2019) Analysis of changes in shelterbelt landscape in Northeast China. Appl Ecol Environ Res 17(5):11655–11668
Ghimire K, Dulin MW, Atchison RL, Goodin DG, Hutchinson JMS (2014) Identification of windbreaks in Kansas using object-based image analysis, GIS techniques and field survey. Agrofor Syst 88:865–875
Gutman G, Ignatov G (1998) The derivation of the green vegetation fraction from NOAA/AVHRR data for use in numerical weather prediction models. Int J Remote Sens 19(8):1533–1543
Ha TV, Amichev BY, Belcher KW, Bentham MJ, Kulshreshtha SN, Laroque CP, Van Rees KCJ (2019) Shelterbelt agroforestry systems inventory and removal analyzed by object-based classification of satellite data in Saskatchewan, Canada. Can J Remote Sens 45(2):246–263
Jia JX, Wang YM, Chen JS, Guo R, Shu R, Wang JY (2020) Status and application of advanced airborne hyperspectral imaging technology: a Review. Infrared Phys Technol 104:103115
Jia JX, Sun HB, Jiang CH, Karila K, Karjalainen M, Ahokas E, Khoramshahi E, Hu PL, Chen C, Xue TR, Wang TH, Chen YW, Hyyppa J (2021) Review on active and passive remote sensing techniques for road extraction. Remote Sens 13:4235
Jiang FQ, Zhou XH, Fu MH, Zhu JJ, Lin HM (1994) Shelterbelt porosity model and its application. Chin J Appl Ecol 5(3):251–255 ((in Chinese with English abstract))
Kristensen SP, Caspersen OH (2002) Analysis of changes in a shelterbelt network landscape in central jutland, denmark. J Environ Manage 66(2):171–183
Lei SJ, Sun H, Liu H, Jiang FG, Chen S, Wu T, Xie Y (2020) Study on extraction method of farmland shelterbelt supported by Landsat 8 time series image. J Cent South Univ for Technol 40(4):57–63 ((in Chinese with English abstract))
Lunden J, Koivunen V (2007) Automatic radar waveform recognition. IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process 1(1):124–136
Santiago JL, Martin F, Cuerva A, Bezdenejnykh N, Sanz-Andres A (2007) Experimental and numerical study of wind flow behind windbreaks. Atmos Environ 41:6406–6420
Shi XL, Li Y, Deng RX (2011) A method for spatial heterogeneity evaluation on landscape pattern of farmland shelterbelt networks: a case study in Midwest of Jilin Province. China Chin Geogr Sci 21(1):48–56
Su N, Yan YM, Qiu MJ, Zhao CH, Wang LG (2018) Object-based dense matching method for maintaining structure characteristics of linear buildings. Sensors 18(4):1035
Thuyet DV, Do TV, Sato T, Hung TT (2014) Effects of species and shelterbelt structure on wind speed reduction in shelter. Agrofor Syst 88(2):237–244
Torita H, Satou H (2007) Relationship between shelterbelt structure and mean wind reduction. Agric for Meteorol 145:186–194
Wiseman G, Kort J, Walker D (2009) Quantification of shelterbelt characteristics using high-resolution imagery. Agric Ecosyst Environ 131:111–117
Wu TG, Yu MK, Wang G, Wang ZX, Duan X, Dong Y, Cheng XR (2013) Effects of stand structure on wind speed reduction in a Metasequoia glyptostroboides shelterbelt. Agrofor Syst 87:251–257
Xing ZF, Li Y, Deng RX, Zhu HL, Fu BL (2016) Extracting Farmland Shelterbelt Automatically Based on ZY-3 Remote Sensing Images. Sci Silv Sin 52:11–20 ((in Chinese with English abstract))
Yang XG, Yu Y, Fan WY (2017) A method to estimate the structural parameters of windbreaks using remote sensing. Agrofor Syst 91(1):37–49
Yang XG, Li FR, Fan WY, Liu GW, Yu Y (2021) Evaluating the efficiency of wind protection by windbreaks based on remote sensing and geographic information systems. Agrofor Syst 95(2):353–365
Yi F, Te RG, Zhao YH, Xu GC (2022) EUNetMTL: multitask joint learning for road extraction from high-resolution remote sensing images. Remote Sens Lett 13(3):258–268
Zhang M, Liu LT, Diao M (2016) LPI radar waveform recognition based on time-frequency distribution. Sensors 16(10):1682
Zheng X, Zhu JJ, Yan Y (2013) Estimation of farmland shelterbelt area in the three-north shelter/protective forest program regions of China based on multi-scale remote sensing data. Chin J Appl Ecol 32(5):1355–1363 ((in Chinese with English abstract))
Zheng X, Zhu JJ, Xing ZF (2016) Assessment of the effects of shelterbelts on crop yields at the regional scale in northeast China. Agric Syst 143:49–60
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31971723), the Distinguished Young Talents in Higher Education of Henan Province (2020GGJS101) and the Key Technologies Research and Development Program of Henan Province (192102110122).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: RD and YL; Methodology: GY and XZ; Formal analysis and investigation: ZX and LZ; Writing—original draft preparation: RD; Writing—review and editing: GY and CL; Funding acquisition: RD.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Deng, R., Yang, G., Li, Y. et al. Identification of shelterbelt width from high-resolution remote sensing imagery. Agroforest Syst 96, 1091–1101 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-022-00768-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-022-00768-1