Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Hair sheep performance in a mid-stage deciduous Appalachian silvopasture

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Silvopastoral management has potential to diversify and increase the output from livestock systems. Silvopastures offer solutions to many management issues associated with grazing systems in Appalachia (USA). Several tree species have been proposed for silvopastures in humid temperate regions, but few data comparing animal performance from systems with different deciduous tree species are available. The objective of this project was to compare early-stage honeylocust (Gleditsia triacanthos) or black walnut (Juglans nigra) silvopastures with open pastures in terms of forage botanical composition, yield, and nutritive value, and in terms of gain, carcass characteristics, and meat quality of hair sheep (Ovis aries) that grazed these systems. Forage and animal performance from open systems (i.e., no trees) was compared with that from silvopastures containing 13- and 14-year-old honeylocust or black walnut trees. Cool-season grass-legume pastures were rotationally stocked with crossbred hair sheep from mid-June through September in 2008 and 2009. Forage production varied by year and pre-graze forage mass in black walnut silvopastures generally was less (P ≤ 0.05) than in open pastures at most measurement periods. Averaged over the season, forage production in honeylocust silvopastures tended (P = 0.0937) to be lower than in open systems in 2008 and was lower (P = 0.0001) in 2009. Few differences in forage nutritive value among systems were observed. Total and average daily gains (ADG) did not differ among treatments in 2008, but black walnut silvopastures supported less (P ≤ 0.05) ADG and total gain than open pastures and honeylocust silvopastures in 2009. Carcass characteristics evaluated did not vary among treatments although hot carcass weights were lower (P < 0.05) for lambs that grazed black walnut silvopastures. Although walnut-based systems were less productive and will need modification to improve output, similar levels of performance between open pastures and honeylocust systems show the potential of silvopasture systems to supply multiple products from the land base without reducing agricultural system production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allard G, Nelson CJ, Pallardy SG (1991) Shade effects on growth of tall fescue: I. Leaf anatomy and dry matter partitioning. Crop Sci 31:163–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appleton B, Berrier R, Harris R, Alleman D, Swanson L (2009) The walnut tree: allelopathic effects and tolerant plants. Virginia Cooperative Extension Publication 430-021

  • Brodie J (1985) Vegetation anaylsis. In: Grassland studies. Unwin Hyman, Boston

  • Buergler AL (2004) Forage production and nutritive value in a temperate Appalachian silvopasture. M.S. Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

  • Buergler AL, Fike JH, Burger JA, Feldhake CR, McKenna JA, Teutsch CD (2005) Botanical composition and forage production in an emulated silvopasture. Agron J 97:1141–1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buergler AL, Fike JH, Burger JA, Feldhake CR, McKenna JA, Teutsch CD (2006) Forage nutritive value in an emulated silvopasture. Agron J 98:1265–1273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke JM, Apple JK, Roberts WJ, Boger CB, Kegley EB (2003) Effect of breed-type on performance and carcass traits of intensively managed hair sheep. Meat Sci 63:309–315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burner DM, Brauer DK (2003) Herbage response to spacing of loblolly pine trees in a minimal management silvopasture in southeastern USA. Agrofor Syst 57:67–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clason TR, Sharrow SH (2000) Silvopastoral practices. In: Garrett HE, Rietveld WJ, Fisher RF (eds) North American agroforestry: an integrated science and practice. American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Madison, WI, pp 79–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis EF (1928) The toxic principle of Juglans nigra as identified with synthetic juglone, and its effects on tomato and alfalfa plants. Am J Bot 15:620

    Google Scholar 

  • Debruyne SA, Burger JA, Feldhake CM, Fike JH (2011) Tree effects on forage growth and soil water in an Appalachian silvopasture. Agrofor Syst 83:189–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldhake CM, Schumann CM (2005) Tree establishment for a temperate agro-forest in Central Appalachia, USA. Agrofor Syst 65:187–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fike JH, Buergler AL, Burger JA, Kallenbach RL (2004) Considerations for establishing and managing silvopastures. Forage Grazinglands. https://doi.org/10.1094/FG-2004-1209-01-RV

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford MM, Zamora DS, Current D, Magner J, Wyatt G, Walter WD, Vaughan S (2017) Impact of managed woodland grazing on forage quantity, quality and livestock performance: the potential for silvopasture in Central Minnesota, USA. Agrofor Syst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0098-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt DA, Hilst AR (1969) Daily variation in carbohydrate content of selected forage crops. Agron J 61:239–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Houx JH, Garrett HE, McGraw JL (2008) Applications of black walnut husks can improve orchardgrass and red clover yields in silvopasture and alley cropping plantings. Agrofor Syst 73:181–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JW, Fike JH, Fike WB, Burger JA, Munsell JF, McKenna JR, Hodges SC (2012) Millwood and wild type honeylocust seedpod nutritive value changes over winter. Crop Sci 52:2807–2816

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JW, Fike JH, Fike WB, Burger JA, McKenna JR, Munsell JF, Hodges SC (2013) Millwood honeylocust trees: seedpod nutritive value and yield characteristics. Agrofor Syst 87:849–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallenbach RL, Kerley MS, Bishop-Hurley GJ (2006) Cumulative forage production, forage quality and livestock performance from an annual ryegrass and cereal rye mixture in a Pine-Walnut Silvopasture. Agrofor Syst 66:43–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallenbach RL, Venable EB, Kerley MS, Bailey NJ (2010) Stockpiled tall fescue and livestock performance in an early stage midwest silvopasture system. Agrofor Syst 80:379–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kephart KD, Buxton DR (1993) Forage quality responses of C3 and C4 perennial grasses to shade. Crop Sci 33:831–837

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin CH, McGraw RL, George MF, Garrett HE (2001) Nutritive quality and morphological development under partial shade of some forage species with agroforestry potential. Agrofor Syst 53:269–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayerfeld D, Rickenbach M, Rissma A (2016) Overcoming history: attitudes of resource professionals and farmers toward silvopasture in southwest Wisconsin. Agrofor Syst 90:723–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McArthur AJ (1991) Forestry and shelter for livestock. For Ecol Mgt 45:93–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel AH, Roark CB (1956) Performance and grazing habits of Hereford and Aberdeen-angus cows and calves on improved pastures as related to types of shade. J Anim Sci 15:59–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitlöhner FM, Galyean ML, McGlone JJ (2002) Shade effects on performance, carcass traits, physiology, and behavior of heat-stressed feedlot heifers. J Anim Sci 80:2043–2050

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mize TA (2014) Perceptions and understanding of silvopasture by extension agents in the Mid-Atlantic and Southern United States. Report to the faculty of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Non-thesis MS

  • Neel JPS, Belesky DP (2015) Herbage production, nutritive value and animal productivity within hardwood silvopasture, open and mixed pasture systems in Appalachia, United States. Grass For Sci 72:137–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neel JPS, Felton EED, Singh S, Sexstone AJ, Belesky DP (2015) Open pasture, silvopasture and sward herbage maturity effects on nutritive value and fermentation characteristics of cool-season pasture. Grass For Sci 71:259–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orefice J, Smith RG, Carroll J, Asbjornsen H, Howard T (2016) Forage productivity and profitability in newly-established open pasture, silvopasture, and thinned forest production systems. Agrofor Syst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-0052-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orefice JJ, Carroll D Conroy, Ketner L (2017) Silvopasture practices and perspectives in the Northeastern United States. Agrofor Syst 91:149–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peri PL, Varella AC, Lucas RJ, Moot DJ (2001) Cocksfoot and lucerne productivity in a Pinus radiata silvopastoral system: a grazed comparison. Proc NZ Grassl Assn 63:139–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Rietveld WJ (1983) Allelopathic effects of juglone on germination and growth of several herbaceous and woody species. J Chem Ecol 9:295–308

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • USDA (1992) United States standards for grades of lamb, yearling mutton, and mutton carcasses. Agricultural Marketing Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildeus S (1997) Hair sheep genetic resources and their contribution to diversified small ruminant production in the United States. J Anim Sci 75:630–640

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Virginia Cooperative Extension, Jonesville, VA, USA

    A. G. Fannon

  2. Crop and Soil Environmental Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA

    J. H. Fike

  3. Animal and Poultry Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA

    S. P. Greiner & M. A. Wahlberg

  4. USDA-ARS, Beaver, WV, USA

    C. M. Feldhake

Authors
  1. A. G. Fannon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. H. Fike
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. P. Greiner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. C. M. Feldhake
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M. A. Wahlberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. H. Fike.

Additional information

C. M. Feldhake and M. A. Wahlberg were retired.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fannon, A.G., Fike, J.H., Greiner, S.P. et al. Hair sheep performance in a mid-stage deciduous Appalachian silvopasture. Agroforest Syst 93, 81–93 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0154-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0154-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation