Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Abundance and diversity of soil invertebrates in annual crops, agroforestry and forest ecosystems in the Nilgiri biosphere reserve of Western Ghats, India

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biologically mediated soil processes rely on soil biota to provide vital ecosystem services in natural and managed ecosystems. However, land use changes continue to impact on assemblages of soil biota and the ecosystem services they provide. The objective of the present study was to assess the effect of land use intensification on the distribution and abundance of soil invertebrate communities in the Nilgiri, a human-dominated biosphere reserve of international importance. Soil invertebrates were sampled in 15 land use practices ranging from simple and intensively managed annual crop fields and monoculture tree plantations through less intensively managed agroforestry and pristine forest ecosystems. The lowest taxonomic richness was found in annual crops and coconut monoculture plantations, while the highest was in moist-deciduous and semi-evergreen forests. With 21 ant species, agroforestry systems had the highest diversity of ants followed by forest ecosystems (12 species). Earthworms and millipedes were significantly more abundant in agroforestry systems, plantations and forest ecosystems than in annual crop fields. Ants, termites, beetles, centipedes, crickets and spiders were more abundant in forest ecosystems than in other ecosystems. It is concluded that annual cropping systems have lower diversity and abundance of soil invertebrates than agroforestry and natural forest ecosystems. These results and the literature from other regions highlight the potential role that agroforestry practices can play in biodiversity conservation in an era of ever-increasing land use intensification and habitat loss.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson JM, Ingram JSI (1993) Tropical soil biology and fertility: a handbook of methods, 2nd edn. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, p 221

    Google Scholar 

  • Anitha K, Joseph S, Chandran RJ, Ramasamy EV, Prasad SN (2010) Tree species diversity and community composition in a human-dominated tropical forest of Western Ghats biodiversity hotspot, India. Ecol Complex 7:217–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrios E (2007) Soil biota, ecosystem services and land productivity. Ecol Econ 64:269–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchart E, Julka JM (1997) Influence of forest disturbance on earthworm (Oligochaeta) communities in the Western Ghats (South India). Soil Biol Biochem 29:303–306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brussaard L, Pulleman MM, Ouédraogo E, Mando A, Six J (2007) Soil fauna and soil function in the fabric of the food web. Pedobiologia 50:447–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chainho P, Lane MF, Chaves ML, Costa JL, Costa MJ, Dauer DM (2007) Taxonomic sufficiency as a useful tool for typology in a poikilohaline estuary. Hydrobiologia 587:63–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrashekara UM (2009) Tree species yielding edible fruit in the coffee-based homegardens of Kerala, India: their diversity, uses and management. Food Sec 1:361–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrashekara UM, Balasundaram M, Sankaran KV, Sujatha MP, Varma RV, Senapati BK, Sahgal M (2006) Conservation and sustainable management of belowground biodiversity in the Kerala part of Nilgiri biosphere reserve. Final Technical Report, Kerala Forest Research Institute

  • Davidar P, Arjunan M, Mammen PC, Garrigues JP, Puyravaud JP, Roessingh K (2007) Forest degradation in the Western Ghats biodiversity hotspot: resource collection, livelihood concerns and sustainability. Curr Sci 93:1573–1578

    Google Scholar 

  • Decaëns T (2010) Macroecological patterns in soil communities. Global Ecol Biogeogr 19:287–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupouey JL, Dambrine E, Laffite JD, Moares C (2002) Irreversible impact of past land use on forest soils and biodiversity. Ecology 83:2978–2984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia C, Marie-Vivien D, Kushalappa CG, Chengappa PG, Nanaya KM (2007) Geographical indications and biodiversity in the Western Ghats, India. Mt Res Dev 27:206–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giller KE, Beare MH, Lavelle P, Izac AMN, Swift MJ (1997) Agricultural intensification, soil biodiversity and agroecosystem function. Appl Soil Ecol 6:3–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt AH, Coppeto SA, Parks SA (2005) The distribution–abundance (density) relationship: its form and causes in a tropical mammal order, Primates. J Biogeogr 32:565–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoehn P, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2010) Relative contribution of agroforestry, rainforest and open land to local and regional bee diversity. Biodivers Conserv 19:2189–2200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones FC (2008) Taxonomic sufficiency: the influence of taxonomic resolution on freshwater bioassessments using benthic macroinvertebrates. Environ Rev 16:45–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kodandapani N, Cochrane MA, Sukumar R (2008) A comparative analysis of spatial, temporal, and ecological characteristics of forest fires in seasonally dry tropical ecosystems in the Western Ghats, India. Forest Ecol Manage 256:607–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar BM (2005) Land use in Kerala: changing scenarios and shifting paradigms. J Trop Agric 42:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar BM, Takeuchi K (2009) Agroforestry in the Western Ghats of peninsular India and the satoyama landscapes of Japan: a comparison of two sustainable land use systems. Sustain Sci 4:215–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavelle P (1996) Diversity of soil fauna and ecosystem function. Biol Int 33:3–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Moço MKS, Gama-Rodrigues EF, Gama-Rodrigues AC, Machado CR, Baligar VC (2009) Soil and litter fauna of cacao agroforestry systems in Bahia, Brazil. Agroforest Syst 76:127–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno CE, Guevara R, Sánchez-Rojas G, Téllez D, Verdú JR (2008) Community level patterns in diverse systems: a case study of litter fauna in a Mexican pine-oak forest using higher taxa surrogates and re-sampling methods. Acta Oecol 33:73–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearman PB, Weber D (2007) Common species determine richness patterns in biodiversity indicator taxa. Biol Conserv 138:109–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi JP, Blanchart E (2005) Seasonal and land use induced variations of soil macrofauna composition in the Western Ghats, southern India. Soil Biol Biochem 37:1093–1104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sileshi G (2008) The excess-zero problem in soil animal count data and choice of models for statistical inference. Pedobiologia 52:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sileshi G, Mafongoya PL (2007) Quantity and quality of organic inputs from coppicing leguminous trees influence abundance of soil macrofauna in maize crops in eastern Zambia. Biol Fert Soils 43:333–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha B, Bhadauria T, Ramakrishnan PS, Saxena KG, Maikhuri RK (2003) Impact of landscape modification on earthworm diversity and abundance in the Hariyali sacred landscape, Garhwal Himalaya. Pedobiologia 47:357–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanabe SI, Kholin SK, Cho YB, Hiramatsu SI, Ohwaki A, Koji S, Higuchi A, Storozhenko SY, Nishihara S, Esaki K, Kimura K, Nakamura K (2007) A higher-taxon approach with soil invertebrates to assessing habitat diversity in East Asian rural landscapes. In: Hong SK, Nakagoshi N, Fu B, Morimoto Y (eds) Landscape ecological applications in man-influenced areas: linking man and nature systems. Springer, pp 163–177

  • Terlizzi A, Anderson MJ, Bevilacqua S, Fraschetti S, Wlodarska-Kowalczuk M, Ellingsen KE (2008) Beta diversity and taxonomic sufficiency: do higher-level taxa reflect heterogeneity in species composition? Divers Distrib 15:450–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiollay J (2005) The role of traditional agroforests in the conservation of rain forest bird diversity in Sumatra. Conserv Biol 9:335–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripathi G, Ram S, Sharma BM, Singh G (2005) Soil faunal biodiversity and nutrient status in silvopastoral systems of Indian desert. Environ Conserv 32:178–188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uezu A, Beyer DD, Metzger JP (2008) Can agroforest woodlots work as stepping stones for birds in the Atlantic forest region? Biodivers Conserv 17:1907–1922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2007) World Heritage sites, Tentative lists, Western Ghats sub cluster, Niligiris. http://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/2103/

  • Yadav BE (2001) Centipedes (Chilopoda: Scolopendridae). In: Fauna of Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve. Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata, i–iv, 1–332, pp 39–44

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to acknowledge UNEP/GEF/TSBF-CIAT programme on Conservation and Sustainable Management of Belowground Biodiversity (CSM-BGBD) for providing financial assistance and Prof. K.G. Saxena, Dean, School of Environmental Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi (National Coordinator, CSM-BGBD project) and Dr. U.M. Chandrashekara, Scientist in Charge of KFRI in Nilambur, Kerala (Principal Investigator, CSM-BGBD project, KFRI) for their support during the project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. W. Sileshi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mujeeb Rahman, P., Varma, R.V. & Sileshi, G.W. Abundance and diversity of soil invertebrates in annual crops, agroforestry and forest ecosystems in the Nilgiri biosphere reserve of Western Ghats, India. Agroforest Syst 85, 165–177 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-011-9386-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-011-9386-3

Keywords

Navigation