Skip to main content
Log in

Pasture production under different tree species and densities in an Atlantic silvopastoral system

  • Silvopastoralism and Sustainable Management International Congress
  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We studied the effect of six tree species planted at six different densities on pasture production seven years after establishment. Annual and seasonal pasture production was studied every six months, over three years. Pasture production was lower under conifer trees (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco, Pinus pinaster Aiton, Pinus radiata D. Don) than under broadleaved trees (Betula alba L., Quercus rubra L. and Castanea sativa Mill.). Annual pasture production under Pseudotsuga menziesii and Pinus pinaster decreased progressively starting from 952 trees ha−1, while decline in herbage production under Pinus radiata began to occur at 427 trees ha−1. Tree density effect on pasture production was detected at 2,000 trees ha−1 for all of the deciduous species studied. This effect on pasture production was more important in the first six months of the year (June sampling), while from June to December herbage production was less affected by tree density. The tree effect became more noticeable over time, with the last sampling showing the inverse relationship between tree density and herbage production most clearly. Seven years after tree establishment, pasture production was quite consistent under tree densities between 190 trees ha−1 and 556 trees ha−1 and declined remarkably from 556 trees ha−1 to 2,500 trees ha−1. The study also indicated that by the sixth growing season, annual pasture production under different tree species is inversely correlated with tree leaf area index.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armand D, Etienne M (1996) Impact of tree canopy cover on subterranean clover overseeding productivity and use in southeastern France. In: Etienne M (ed) Western European silvopastoral systems. INRA, París

  • Brockway DG, Wolters GL, Pearson HA, Thill RE, Baldwin VC, Martin A (1998) Understory plant response to site preparation and fertilization of loblolly and shortleaf pine forests. J Range Manag 51:47–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Burner DM, Brauer DK (2003) Herbage response to spacing of loblolly pine trees in a minimal management silvopasture in southeastern USA. Agrofor Syst 57:69–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupraz C, Newman SM (1997) Temperate agroforestry: the European way. In: Gordon AM, Newman SM (eds) Temperate agroforestry systems, CAB International, Wallingford

  • Fernández ME, Gyenge JE, Dalla Salda G, Schlichter TM (2002) Silvopastoral systems in northwestern Patagonia I: Growth and photosynthesis of Stipa speciosa under different levels of Pinus ponderosa cover. Agrofor Syst 55:27–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Hernández MP (2005) Quality of vegetation in silvopastoral systems. In: Mosquera-Losada MR, McAdam J, Rigueiro-Rodriguez A (eds) Silvopastoralism and sustainable land management, CAB International, Wallingford

  • González-Hernández MP, Silva-Pando FJ (1996) Grazing effects of ungulates in a Galician oak forest (Northwest Spain). For Ecol Manag 88:65–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Hernández MP, Silva-Pando FJ, Casal Jiménez M (1998) Production patterns of understory layers in several Galician (NW Spain) woodlands. For Ecol Manag 109:251–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElwee HF, Knowles RL (2000) Estimating canopy closure and understorey pasture production in New Zealand-grown poplar plantations. New Zeal J For Sci 30(3):422–435

    Google Scholar 

  • MeteoGalicia (2004) Servicio de Información Ambiental. Consellería de Medio Ambiente. Xunta de Galicia, www.siam-cma.org

  • Montard de FX, Rapey H, Delpy R, Massey P (1999) Competition for light, water and nitrogen in an association of hazel (Corylus avellana L.) and cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.). Agrofor Syst 43:135–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman SM, Gordon AM (1997) Temperate agroforestry: synthesis and future directions. In: Gordon AM, Newman SM (eds) Temperate agroforestry systems. CAB International, Wallingford

  • Pearson HA, Knowles RL, Middlemiss PG, Baldwin VC, Busby RL (1995a). United States Agroforestry Estate Model. Compiler 13:27–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson HA, Wolters GL, Thill RE, Martin A Jr, Baldwin VC (1995b) Plant response to soils, site preparation, and initial pine planting density. J Range Manag 48:511–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Percival NS, Knowles RL (1988) Relationship between radiata pine and understory pasture production. FRI-Bull 139:152–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigueiro-Rodríguez A, Rois-Díaz M, Pinto M, Oliveira A, Mosquera-Losada MR (2005) Future perspectives for silvopastoral systems in NW Spain. In: Mosquera-Losada MR, McAdam J, Rigueiro-Rodríguez A (eds) Silvopastoralism and sustainable land management, CAB International, Wallingford

  • San Miguel A (1994) La dehesa española. Origen, tipología, características y gestión. Fundación Conde del Valle de Salazar, Madrid

  • SAS Institute Inc. (1990) SAS/STAT User’s Guide Version 6, 4th edn. Cary, NC

  • Sharrow SH, Fletcher R (2003) Converting a pasture to a silvopasture in the Pacific Northwest. USDA National Agroforestry Center, Agroforestry Note 26, p 4

  • Sibbald AR (1999) Silvopastoral agroforestry: soil–plant–animal interactions in the establishment phase. Grassland Sci Eur 4:133–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibbald AR, Griffiths JH, Elston DA (1994) Herbage yield in agroforestry systems as a function of easily measured attributes of the tree canopy. For Ecol Manag 65:195–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva-Pando FJ, González-Hernández MP, Rigueiro-Rodríguez A (1998) Grazing by livestock in pinewood and eucalyptus forests: multiple use in northwest Spain. Agrofor Forum 9(1):36–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva-Pando FJ, González-Hernández MP, Rozados-Lorenzo MJ (2002) Pasture production in a silvopastoral system in relation with microclimate variables in the Atlantic coast of Spain. Agrofor Syst 56:203–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teklehaimanot Z, Jones M, Sinclair FL (2002) Tree and livestock productivity in relation to tree planting configuration in a silvopastoral system in North Wales, UK. Agrofor Syst 56:47–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by INIA SC96-032 and INIA PD99-002 projects. The authors thank to M. Alonso and F. Ignacio for soil analysis and to Jose Ríos, Aurea Pazos, Kike Diz and Félix Montoto for excellent assistance in the field. We thank two anonymous reviewers for his helpful comments that improve substantially the manuscript. Lisa M. Holland helped edit the final manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. J. Rozados-Lorenzo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rozados-Lorenzo, M.J., González-Hernández, M.P. & Silva-Pando, F.J. Pasture production under different tree species and densities in an Atlantic silvopastoral system. Agroforest Syst 70, 53–62 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-007-9032-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-007-9032-2

Keywords

Navigation