Skip to main content
Log in

Elastic Registration Based on Compliance Analysis and Biomechanical Graph Matching

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An automatic elastic registration method suited for vascularized organs is proposed. The vasculature in both the preoperative and intra-operative images is represented as a graph. A typical application of this method is the fusion of pre-operative information onto the organ during surgery, to compensate for the limited details provided by the intra-operative imaging modality (e.g. cone beam CT) and to cope with changes in the shape of the organ. Due to image modalities differences and organ deformation, each graph has a different topology and shape. The adaptive compliance graph matching (ACGM) method presented does not require any manual initialization, handles intra-operative nonrigid deformations of up to 65 mm and computes a complete displacement field over the organ from only the matched vasculature. ACGM is better than the previous biomechanical graph matching method (Garcia Guevara et al. IJCARS, 2018) (BGM) because it uses an efficient biomechanical vascularized liver model to compute the organ’s transformation and the vessels bifurcations compliance. This allows to efficiently find the best graph matches with a novel compliance-based adaptive search. These contributions are evaluated on 10 realistic synthetic and 2 porcine automatically segmented datasets. ACGM obtains better target registration error (TRE) than BGM, with an average TRE in the real datasets of 4.2 mm compared to 6.5 mm, respectively. It also is up to one order of magnitude faster, less dependent on the parameters used and more robust to noise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://www.pardiso-project.org/.

References

  1. Cho, M., J. Lee, and K. M. Lee. Reweighted random walks for graph matching. In: Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Computer Vision: Part V, ECCV’10. Berlin: Springer, 2010, pp. 492–505.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Duriez, C., S. Cotin, J. Lenoir, and P. Neumann. New approaches to catheter navigation for interventional radiology simulation. Comput. Aided Surg. 11:300–308, 2006.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Garcia Guevara, J., I. Peterlik, M.-O. Berger, and S. Cotin. Biomechanics-based graph matching for augmented ct-cbct. IJCARS , 2018.

  4. Groher, M., T. F. Jakobs, N. Padoy, and N. Navab. Planning and intraoperative visualization of liver catheterizations: new CTA protocol and 2D-3D registration method. Acad. Radiol. 14:1325–1340, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lange, T., N. Papenberg, S. Heldmann, J. Modersitzki, B. Fischer, H. Lamecker, and P. M. Schlag. 3D ultrasound–CT registration of the liver using combined landmark-intensity information. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 4:79–88, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Leordeanu, M. and M. Hebert. A spectral technique for correspondence problems using pairwise constraints. In: International Conference of Computer Vision (ICCV), volume 2, pp. 1482–1489, 2005.

  7. Martínez, J., J. Dumas, S. Lefebvre, and L.-Y. Wei. Structure and appearance optimization for controllable shape design. ACM Trans. Graph. 34:229:1–22911, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Matl, S., R. Brosig, M. Baust, N. Navab, and S. Demirci. Vascular image registration techniques: a living review. Med. Image Anal. 35:1 – 17, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Moriconi, S., M. Zuluaga, H. Rolf Jäger, P. Nachev, S. Ourselin, and M. Jorge Cardoso. Elastic registration of geodesic vascular graphs. In: MICCAI 2018, pp. 810–818, 2018.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Nesme, M., Y. Payan, and F. Faure. Efficient, physically plausible finite elements. In: Eurographics 2005, Short Papers, August 2005, edited by J. Dingliana and F. Ganovelli, 2005.

  11. Oktay, O., L. Zhang, T. Mansi, P. Mountney, P. Mewes, S. Nicolau, L. Soler, and C. Chefd’hotel. Biomechanically driven registration of pre- to intra-operative 3D images for laparoscopic surgery. In: International Conference on MICCAI. Springer, 2013, pp. 1–9.

  12. Peterlík, I., H. Courtecuisse, R. Rohling, P. Abolmaesumi, C. Nguan, S. Cotin, and S. Salcudean. Fast elastic registration of soft tissues under large deformations. Med. Image Anal. 45:24–40, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Peterlík, I., C. Duriez, and S. Cotin. Modeling and real-time simulation of a vascularized liver tissue. In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pp. 50–57, 2012.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Peters, T. and K. Cleary. Image-Guided Interventions: Technology and Applications. New York: Springer 2008.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Pinheiro, M. A. and J. Kybic. Incremental B-spline deformation model for geometric graph matching. In: ISBI, 2018.

  16. Pinheiro, M. A., J. Kybic, and P. Fua. Geometric graph matching using Monte Carlo tree search. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 39:2171–2185, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Plantefève, R., S. Kadoury, A. Tang, and I. Peterlik. Robust automatic graph-based skeletonization of hepatic vascular trees. In: Intravascular Imaging and Computer Assisted Stenting, and Large-Scale Annotation of Biomedical Data and Expert Label Synthesis, pp. 20–28, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Plantefève, R., I. Peterlik, N. Haouchine, and S. Cotin. Patient-specific biomechanical modeling for guidance during minimally-invasive hepatic surgery. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 44:139–153, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Przemieniecki, J. S. Theory of Matrix Structural Analysis. New York: Dover, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Serradell, E., M. A. Pinheiro, R. Sznitman, J. Kybic, F. Moreno-Noguer, and P. Fua. Non-rigid graph registration using active testing search. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 37:625–638, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Smistad, E., A. C. Elster, and F. Lindseth. GPU accelerated segmentation and centerline extraction of tubular structures from medical images. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 9:561–575, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sotiras, A., C. Davatzikos, and N. Paragios. Deformable medical image registration: a survey. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 32:1153–1190, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tacher, V., A. Radaelli, M. Lin, and J.-F. Geschwind. How I do it: cone-beam CT during transarterial chemoembolization for liver cancer. Radiology 274:320–334, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Xue, H., C. Malamateniou, L. Srinivan, J. Hajnal, and D. Rueckert. Automatic extraction and matching of neonatal cerebral vasculature. In: ISBI 2006, pp. 810–818, 2006.

  25. Zhou, F. and F. D. la Torre Frade. Factorized graph matching. In: IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2015.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the support from Inria, the MIMESIS and MAGRIT Teams, and IHU Strasbourg. Jaime Garcia Guevara is supported by the Grand Est region and Inria.

Conflict of interest

We declare that this article is free from conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaime Garcia Guevara.

Additional information

Associate Editor Elena S. Di Martino oversaw the review of this article.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Garcia Guevara, J., Peterlik, I., Berger, MO. et al. Elastic Registration Based on Compliance Analysis and Biomechanical Graph Matching. Ann Biomed Eng 48, 447–462 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-019-02364-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-019-02364-4

Keywords

Navigation