Abstract
The successful integration of an orthopedic implant into bone depends on the mechanisms at the tissue–implant interface and mostly on the osteoblast attachment phenomenon. Chitosan has emerged as an attractive biomacromolecule favoring osseointegration. In this study highly deacetylated chitosan coatings, with roughness of about 1 nm, were bonded to glass surfaces via silane–glutaraldehyde molecules. Human osteoblasts were used to study the development of attachment during the first 60 min. Chitosan favored the number of the attached cells compared to the uncoated surfaces for 30 min seeding time (t s). For t s up to 60 min the attached cell area was almost 210% significantly higher on the chitosan surfaces, indicating an enhanced spreading process. To determine the cell attachment strength, a micropipette aspiration method was used, where the value of the term I = ∫Fdt is representative of the single cell attachment–adhesion procedure and quantitatively reflects the strength evolution during attachment: F equals the detaching force applied on the cell. The results showed higher strength values on the chitosan surfaces. The findings reinforce the favorable environment of the biomacromolecule for the osteoblast and the new approach regarding the quantitatively evaluation of adhesion provides important contribution for the study of cell–material interaction, especially during the crucial first phase of cell attachment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anselme, K. Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials. Biomaterials 21(7):667–681, 2000.
Athanassiou, G., and D. Deligianni. Adhesion strength of individual human bone marrow cells to fibronectin. Integrin beta1-mediated adhesion. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 12(10–12):965–970, 2001.
Bumgardner, J. D., R. Wiser, P. D. Gerard, P. Bergin, B. Chestnutt, M. Marin, V. Ramsey, S. H. Elder, and J. A. Gilbert. Chitosan: potential use as a bioactive coating for orthopaedic and craniofacial/dental implants. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 14(5):423–438, 2003.
Chellat, F., M. Tabrizian, S. Dumitriu, E. Chornet, C. H. Rivard, and L. Yahia. Study of biodegradation behavior of chitosan–xanthan microspheres in simulated physiological media. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 53(5):592–599, 2000.
Cretel, E., A. Pierres, A. M. Benoliel, and P. Bongrand. How cells feel their environment: a focus on early dynamic events. Cell. Mol. Bioeng. 1(1):5–14, 2008.
Custódio, C. A., C. M. Alves, R. L. Reis, and J. F. Mano. Immobilization of fibronectin in chitosan substrates improves cell adhesion and proliferation. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 4(4):316–323, 2010.
Dalby, M. J., S. J. Yarwood, M. O. Riehle, J. H. Johnstone, S. Affrossman, and A. S. Curtis. Increasing fibroblast response to materials using nanotopography: morphological and genetic measurements of cell response to 13-nm-high polymer demixed islands. Exp. Cell Res. 276:1–9, 2002.
Di Martino, A., M. Sittinger, and M. V. Risbud. Chitosan: a versatile polymer for orthopaedic tissue-engineering. Biomaterials 26(30):5983–5990, 2005 (Review).
Fakhry, A., G. B. Schneider, R. Zaharias, and S. Senel. Chitosan supports the initial attachment and spreading of osteoblasts preferentially over fibroblasts. Biomaterials 25:2075–2079, 2004.
Fang, N., Z. Aiping, M. B. Chan-Park, and V. Chan. Adhesion contact dynamics of fibroblasts on biomacromolecular surfaces. Macromol. Biosci. 5:1022–1031, 2005.
Filho, F. C. S., and G. C. Menezes. Osteoblasts attachment and adhesion: how bone cells fit fibronectin-coated surfaces. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 24:637–641, 2004.
Heinemman, C., S. Heinemann, A. Bernhardt, H. Worch, and T. Hanke. Novel textile chitosan scaffolds promote spreading, proliferation and differentiation of osteoblasts. Biomacromolecules 9(10):2913–2920, 2008.
Jayakumar, R., V. V. Divya Rani, K. T. Shalumon, P. T. Kumar, S. V. Nair, T. Furuike, and H. Tamura. Bioactive and osteoblast cell attachment studies of novel α- and β-chitin membranes for tissue engineering applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 45:260–264, 2009.
Kennedy, S. B., N. R. Washburn, C. G. Simon, Jr., and E. J. Armis. Combinatorial screen of the effect of surface energy on fibronectin-mediated osteoblast adhesion, spreading and proliferation. Biomaterials 27(20):3817–3824, 2006.
Klokkevold, P. R., L. Vandermark, E. B. Kenney, and G. W. Bernard. Osteogenesis enhanced by chitosan (poly-n-acetyl glucosaminoglycan) in vitro. J. Periodontol. 67:1170–1175, 1996.
Klozov, M. M., M. Winterhalten, and D. Lerche. Elastic properties of strongly curved monolayers. Effect of electric surface charges. J. Phys. II 2(2):175–185, 1992.
LeBaron, R. G., and K. A. Athanasiou. Extracellular matrix cell adhesion peptides: functional applications in orthopaedic materials. Tissue Eng. 6(2):85–103, 2000.
Lim, J. Y., J. C. Hansen, C. A. Siedlecki, R. W. Hengstebeck, J. Cheng, N. Winograd, and H. J. Donahue. Osteoblast adhesion on poly(L-lactic acid)/polystyrene demixed thin film blends: effect of nanotopography, surface chemistry and wettability. Biomacromolecules 6(6):3319–3327, 2005.
Lim, J. Y., A. D. Dreiss, Z. Zhou, J. C. Hansen, C. A. Siedlecki, R. W. Hengstebeck, J. Cheng, N. Winograd, and H. J. Donahue. The regulation of integrin-mediated osteoblast focal adhesion and focal adhesion kinase expression by nanoscale topography. Biomaterials 28(10):1787–1797, 2007.
Lopez-Perez, P. M., R. M. P. da Silva, C. Serra, I. Pashkuleva, and R. L. Reis. Surface phosphorylation of chitosan significantly improves osteoblast cell viability, attachment and proliferation. J. Mater. Chem. 20:483–491, 2010.
Mao, J. S., Y. L. Cui, X. H. Wang, Y. Sun, Y. J. Yin, H. M. Zhao, and K. D. De Yao. A preliminary study on chitosan and gelatin polyelectrolyte complex cytocompatibility by cell cycle and apoptosis analysis. Biomaterials 25:3973–3981, 2004.
Meyer, U., A. Büchter, H. P. Wiesmann, U. Joos, and D. B. Jones. Basic reactions of osteoblasts on structured material surfaces. Eur. Cell Mater. 9:39–49, 2005.
Nagahama, H., V. V. Rani, K. T. Shalumon, R. Jayakumar, S. V. Nair, S. Koiwa, T. Furuike, and H. Tamura. Preparation, characterization, bioactive and cell attachment studies of α-chitin/gelatin composite membranes. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 44:333–337, 2009.
Pierres, A., A. M. Benoliel, D. Touchard, and P. Bongrand. How cells tiptoe on adhesive surfaces before sticking. Biophys. J. 94:4114–4122, 2008.
Prasitslip, M., R. Jenwithisuk, K. Kongsuwan, N. Damrongchai, and P. Watts. Cellular responses to chitosan in vitro: the importance of deacetylation. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 11:773–778, 2000.
Seol, Y. J., J. Y. Lee, Y. J. Park, Y. M. Lee, I. Young-Ku, C. Rhyu, S. J. Lee, S. B. Han, and C. P. Chung. Chitosan sponges as tissue engineering scaffolds for bone formation. Biotechnol. Lett. 26(13):1037–1041, 2004.
Suh, J. K., and H. W. Matthew. Application of chitosan-based polysaccharide biomaterials in cartilage tissue engineering: a review. Biomaterials 21(24):2589–2598, 2000.
Sung, K. L., M. K. Kwan, F. Maldonado, and W. H. Akeson. Adhesion strength of human ligament fibroblasts. J. Biomech. Eng. 116(3):237–242, 1994.
Tohimata, K., and Y. Ikada. In vitro and in vivo degradation of films of chitin and its deacetylated derivatives. Biomaterials 18(7):567–575, 1997.
Verma, D., K. S. Katti, and D. R. Katti. Osteoblast adhesion, proliferation and growth on polyelectrolyte complex–hydroxyapatite nanocomposites. Philos. Transact. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 368(1917):2083–2097, 2010.
Vitte, J., A. M. Benoliel, A. Pierres, and P. Bongrand. Regulation of cell adhesion. Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc. 33:167–188, 2005.
Wildt, B., D. Wirtz, and P. C. Searson. Programmed subcellular release for studying the dynamics of cell detachment. Nat. Methods. 6(3):211–213, 2009.
Wilson, C. J., R. E. Clegg, D. I. Leavesley, and M. J. Pearcy. Mediation of biomaterial–cell interactions by adsorbed proteins: a review. Tissue Eng. 11(1–2):1–18, 2005.
Yin, C., K. Liao, H. Q. Mao, K. W. Leong, R. X. Zhuo, and V. Chan. Adhesion contact dynamics of HepG2 cells on galactose-immobilized substrates. Biomaterials 24:837–850, 2003.
Yuan, Y., B. M. Chesnutt, L. Wright, W. O. Haggard, and J. D. Bumgardner. Mechanical property, degradation rate, and bone cell growth of chitosan coated titanium influenced by degree of deacetylation of chitosan. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 86(1):245–252, 2008.
Zheng, Z., L. Zhang, L. Kong, A. Wang, Y. Gong, and X. Zhang. The behavior of MC3T3-E1 cells on chitosan/poly-L-lysine composite films: Effect of nanotopography, surface chemistry, and wettability. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 89A:453–465, 2009.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully thank Korovessis Panagiotis, MD, Chief Orthopaedic Department, General Hospital “Agios Andreas”, Patras, for providing the human bone marrow. The authors would also like to acknowledge Professor Y. F. Missirlis and M. Katsikogianni, PhD, for their contribution regarding the AFM analysis as well as the graduate student P. Patsanis for his valuable help with the SEM images and the Image analysis. Finally, the authors thank Dr. E. Siokou, from the FORTH/ICE-HT, Patras, for the XPS analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Associate Editor Eric M. Darling oversaw the review of this article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moutzouri, A.G., Athanassiou, G.M. Attachment, Spreading, and Adhesion Strength of Human Bone Marrow Cells on Chitosan. Ann Biomed Eng 39, 730–741 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-010-0188-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-010-0188-y