Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanical Properties and Compositions of Tissue Engineered and Native Arteries

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the goal of mimicking the mechanical properties of a given native tissue, tissue engineers seek to culture replacement tissues with compositions similar to those of native tissues. In this report, differences between the mechanical properties of engineered arteries and native arteries were correlated with differences in tissue composition. Engineered arteries failed to match the strengths or compliances of native tissues. Lower strengths of engineered arteries resulted partially from inferior organization of collagen, but not from differences in collagen density. Furthermore, ultimate strengths of engineered vessels were significantly reduced by the presence of residual polyglycolic acid polymer fragments, which caused stress concentrations in the vessel wall. Lower compliances of engineered vessels resulted from minimal smooth muscle cell contractility and a lack of organized extracellular elastin. Organization of elastin and collagen in engineered arteries may have been partially hindered by high concentrations of sulfated glycosaminoglycans. Tissue engineers should continue to regulate cell phenotype and promote synthesis of proteins that are known to dominate the mechanical properties of the associated native tissue. However, we should also be aware of the potential negative impacts of polymer fragments and glycosaminoglycans on the mechanical properties of engineered tissues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Armentano R. L., Levenson J., Barra J. G., Cabrera Fischer E. I., Breitbart G. J., Pichel R. H., Simon A. (1991) Assessment of elastin and collagen contribution to aortic elasticity in conscious dogs. Am. J. Physiol. 260:H1870–H1877

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bank A. J., Wang. H., Holte J. E., Mullen. K., Shammas. R., Kubo S. H. (1996) Contribution of collagen, elastin, and smooth muscle to in vivo human brachial artery wall stress and elastic modulus. Circulation 94:3263–3270

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bickford W. B. (1993) Mechanics of solids: Concepts and applications. Homewood, IL: Irwin

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brown A. N., Kim B. S., Alsberg E., Mooney D. J. (2000) Combining chondrocytes and smooth muscle cells to engineer hybrid soft tissue constructs. Tissue Eng. 6:297–305

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dahl S. L. M., Koh J., Prabhakar V., Niklason L. E. (2003) Decellularized native and engineered arterial scaffolds for transplantation. Cell Transplant. 12:659–666

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dahl S. L. M., Rucker R. B., Niklason L. E. (2005) Effects of copper and cross-linking on the extracellular matrix of tissue-engineered arteries. Cell Transplant. 14(10):861–868

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Debelle L., Tamburro A. M. (1999) Elastin: Molecular description and function. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 31:261–272

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Freed L. E., Vunjak-Novakovic G., Biron R. J., Eagles D. B., Lesnoy D. C., Barlow S. K., Langer R. (1994) Biodegradable polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering. Bio/Technology 12:689–693

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hinek A., Mecham R. P., Keeley. F., Rabinovitch M. (1991) Impaired elastin fiber assembly related to reduced 67-kd elastin-binding protein in fetal lamb ductus arteriosus and in cultured aortic smooth muscle cells treated with chondroitin sulfate. J. Clin. Invest. 88(6):2083–2094

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Holzapfel G. A., Gasser T. C. (2000) A new constitutive framework for arterial wall mechanics and a comparative study of material models. J. Elast. 61:1–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim Y. J., Sah R. L., Doong J. Y. H., Grodzinsky A. J. (1988) Fluorometric assay of DNA in cartilage explants using hoechst 33258. Anal. Biochem. 174:168–176

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lanir Y. (1983) Constitutive equations for fibrous connective tissues. J. Biomech. 16(1):1–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lemire J. M., Merrilees M. J., Braun K. R., Wight T. N. (2002) Overexpression of the v3 variant of versican alters arterial smooth muscle cell adhesion, migration, and proliferation in vitro. J. Cell Physiol. 190(1):38–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Merrilees M. J., Tiang K. M., Scott L. (1987) Changes in collagen fibril diameters across artery walls including a correlation with glycosaminoglycan content. Connect. Tissue Res. 16:237–257

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mitchell S. L., Niklason L. E. (2003) Requirements for growing tissue engineered vascular grafts. Cardiovasc. Pathol. 12(2):59–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Niklason L. E., Gao. J., Abbott W. M., Hirschi. K., Houser. S., Marini. R., Langer R. (1999) Functional arteries grown in vitro. Science 284:489–493

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Parry D. A. D., and A. S. Craig. Growth and development of collagen fibrils in connective tissue. In Ultrastructure of the Connective Tissue Matrix, edited by A. Ruggeri and P. M. Motta, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Pub, pp. 34–64, 1984

  18. Piez, K. A. and R. C. Likins. The nature of collagen. In Calcification in Biological Systems: A Symposium presented at the Washington Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. December 29, 1958, edited by R. F. Sognnaes. Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science, pp. 411–420, 1960

  19. Prabhakar V., Grinstaff M. W., Alarcon J., Knors C., Solan A. K., Niklason L. E. (2003) Engineering porcine arteries: Effects of scaffold modification. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 67A:303–311

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sacks M. S. (2003) Incorporation of experimentally-derived fiber orientation into a structural constitutive model for planar tissues. Trans. ASME 125:280–287

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schoeffter P., Muller-Schweinitzer E. (1990) The preservation of functional activity of smooth muscle and endothelium in pig coronary arteries after storage at −190 degrees C. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 42(9):646–651

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schonherr E., Jarvelainen H. T., Sandell L. J., Wight T. N. (1991) Effects of platelet-derived growth factor and transforming growth factor-beta 1 on the synthesis of a large versican-like chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan by arterial smooth muscle cells. J. Biol. Chem. 266(26):17640–17647

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Song Y. C., Hunt C. J., Pegg D. E. (1994) Cryopreservation of the common carotid artery of the rabbit. Cryobiology 31:317–329

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Song Y. C., Pegg D. E., Hunt C. J. (1995) Cryopreservation of the common carotid artery of the rabbit: Optimization of dimethyl sulfoxide concentration and cooling rate. Cryobiology 32(5):405–421

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Stegemann J. P., Nerem R. M. (2003) Altered response of vascular smooth muscle cells to exogenous biochemical stimulation in two- and three-dimensional culture. Exp. Cell Res. 283(2):146–155

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Thyberg J. (1996) Differentiated properties and proliferation of arterial smooth muscle cells in culture. Int. Rev. Cytol. 169:183–265

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wight T. N., Merrilees M. J. (2004) Proteoglycans in atherosclerosis and restenosis: Key roles for versican. Circ. Res. 94(9):1158–1167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Woessner J. F. (1961) The determination of hydroxyproline in tissue and protein samples containing small proportions of this amino acid. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 93:440–447

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by NIH R-1 HL63766. The authors wish to thank Jay Humphrey for discussions about stress concentrations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shannon L. M. Dahl.

Appendix

Appendix

Calculation of Stress Concentrations Caused by Polymer Fragments

At the suture line, regions of densely packed PGA fragments (e.g., circled area in Fig. 4) were approximated as a single circular stress concentration in the vessel wall. The behavior of this stress concentration during mechanical testing was assumed to be analogous to a void within a plate being pulled in tension.3

To calculate the maximum local stress seen by engineered tissue bordering a polymer “void,” vessel wall thickness, h, and radius of the polymer void, r void, were used to calculate the thickness of the vessel wall not containing polymer, d:

$$ d\,{\text{ = }}\,h\, - \,{\text{2}}r_{{\text{void}}} $$
(A1)

The ratio r void/d was used to calculate a stress concentration factor, K T, which ranged from 2.0 to 3.0:

$$ K_{\text{T}} \,{\text{ = }}\,\frac{{\sigma _{{\text{max}}} }} {{\sigma _{{\text{avg}}} }} $$
(A2)

where σmax was the maximum stress seen by a tissue at a void edge, and σavg was the average stress across d (Fig. 5).

Figure 5.
figure 5

Engineered vessels sense higher stresses near polymer fragments, which act as voids in the tissue, than at tissue sites far away from polymer fragments. σo was the stress seen across the vessel wall when stress distribution was not disrupted by polymer fragments. σavg was the average stress seen across d, the thickness of the vessel wall without the polymer particle. σmax was the maximum stress seen by the tissue at the edge of the polymer or void space. P was the pressure exerted on the vessel lumen.

For a void space covering 15% of the vessel area, r void/d = 0.118, and thus, K T = 2.5.3 With

$$ \sigma _{\text{o}} \,{\text{ = }}\,\frac{{Pr_{\text{i}} }} {h}\,{\text{ = }}\,\frac{{{\text{Force}}}} {{{\text{SurfaceArea}}}} $$
(A3)

where r i was the vessel inner radius, and

$$ \sigma _{{\text{avg}}} \,{\text{ = }}\,\frac{{{\text{Force}}}} {{{\text{(}}h\, - \,{\text{2}}r_{{\text{void}}} {\text{)}}\,\; \times \;\,{\text{length}}}}\,{\text{ = }}\,\frac{{{\text{SurfaceArea}}\, \times \,\sigma _{\text{o}} }} {{{\text{(}}h\, - \,{\text{2}}r_{{\text{void}}} {\text{)}}\,{\text{*}}\,{\text{length}}}} $$
(A4)

where length was the axial length of the tested vessel segment, σmax could be calculated from Eq. (A2). The ratio σmaxo described the factor of increased stress seen by engineered tissue near the polymer void (Table 3). Thus, in the absence of polymer fragments at the suture line and elsewhere, engineered tissues may withstand pressures and stresses greater than 3 times their reported burst pressures and maximum stresses.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dahl, S.L.M., Rhim, C., Song, Y.C. et al. Mechanical Properties and Compositions of Tissue Engineered and Native Arteries. Ann Biomed Eng 35, 348–355 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-006-9226-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-006-9226-1

Keywords

Navigation