Skip to main content
Log in

Bootstrap rolling-window Granger causality dynamics between momentum and sentiment: implications for investors

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Annals of Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper seeks to examine the unidirectional versus bidirectional Granger causality between investors’ sentiment and momentum strategies. It is based on the full sample Granger causality test and the recent rolling-window bootstrap approach. We also applied a probit model to the extent to which the probability that investors’ sentiment and momentum strategies influence each other. Our results suggest bidirectional Granger causality between investor sentiment and momentum strategy with unstable causality dynamics over time. We find that ADS and VIX positively affect the likelihood that investor sentiment Granger causes momentum strategy and negatively impact the probability that momentum strategy Granger causes investor sentiment. Gold harms the likelihood that investors’ sentiment and momentum strategies affect each other. The research design is unique to combine bootstrap rolling-window Granger causality tests between Sentiment and Momentum to assess investors’ implications in terms of confidence, uncertainty, aggressiveness, or optimism versus Pessimism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In 12 European markets, Rouwenhorst (1998) discovers a positive momentum return. Hameed and Kusnadi (2002) show that momentum strategies are profitable in the Asian market. In 40 different countries, Griffin et al. (2003) find that the momentum portfolio earns a profitable return.

  2. The first group is based on market prices and includes the closed-end funds discount (CEFD), the put/call ratio, and the short-interest ratio. At the same time, the second group is derived from the polling of investors and encloses the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index (CSI), the survey of the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII), and the Investors’ Intelligence index (II).

  3. The macroeconomic indicators are real growth in durable consumption, growth in industrial production, growth in employment, services consumption, nondurable consumption, and National Bureau of Economic Research recession indicator.

References

  • Abid, I., Dhaoui, A., Goutte, S., Guesmi, K.: Hedging and diversification across commodity assets. Appl. Econ. 52(23), 2472–2492 (2020a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abid, I., Dhaoui, A., Guesmi, K., Kaabia, O.: Hedging strategy for financial variables and commodities. Econ. Bull. 40(2), 1368–1379 (2020b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D.W., Ploberger, W.: Optimal tests when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative. Econom. J. Econom. Soc. 62(6), 1383–1414 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D.W.: Tests for parameter instability and structural change with unknown change point. Econom. J. Econom. Soc. 61(4), 821–856 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Antoniou, C., Doukas, J.A., Subrahmanyam, A.: Cognitive dissonance, sentiment, and momentum. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 48(1), 245–275 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M., Wurgler, J.: Investor sentiment and the cross-section of stock returns. J. Financ. 61(4), 1645–1680 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M., Wurgler, J., Yuan, Y.: Global, local, and contagious investor sentiment. J. Financ. Econ. 104(2), 272–287 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balcilar, M., Ozdemir, Z.A., Arslanturk, Y.: Economic growth and energy consumption causal nexus viewed through a bootstrap rolling window. Energy Econ. 32(6), 1398–1410 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barberis, N., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.: A model of investor sentiment. J. Financ. Econ. 49(3), 307–343 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basher, S.A., Sadorsky, P.: Hedging emerging market stock prices with oil, Gold, VIX, and bonds: a comparison between DCC ADCC and GO-GARCH. Energy Econ. 54, 235–247 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baur, D.G., Lucey, B.M.: Flights and contagion-an empirical analysis of stock-bond correlations. J. Financ. Stab. 5(4), 339–352 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bottazzi, G., Dindo, P., Giachini, D.: Momentum and reversal in financial markets with persistent heterogeneity. Ann. Finance 15(4), 455–487 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, K., Hirshleifer, D., Subrahmanyam, A.: Investor psychology and security market under-and overreactions. J. Financ. 53(6), 1839–1885 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLong, J.B., Shleifer, A., Summers, L., Waldmann, R.: Noise trader risk in financial markets. J. Polit. Econ. 98, 703–738 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolado, J.J., Lütkepohl, H.: Making Wald tests work for cointegrated VAR systems. Economet. Rev. 15(4), 369–386 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frazzini, A.: The disposition effect and underreaction to the news. J. Financ. 61(4), 2017–2046 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friesen, G.C., Weller, P.A., Dunham, L.M.: Price trends and patterns in technical analysis: a theoretical and empirical examination. J. Bank. Finance 33(6), 1089–1100 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J.M., Ji, X., Martin, J.S.: Momentum investing and business cycle risk: evidence from pole to pole. J. Financ. 58(6), 2515–2547 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grinblatt, M., Han, B.: Prospect theory, mental accounting, and momentum. J. Financ. Econ. 78(2), 311–339 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, R.S., Hatemi-J, A.: Tests for causality between integrated variables using asymptotic and bootstrap distributions: theory and application. Appl. Econ. 38(13), 1489–1500 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hameed, A., Kusnadi, Y.: Momentum strategies: evidence from Pacific Basin stock markets. J. Financ. Res. 25(3), 383–397 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hameed, A., Yuanto, K.: Momentum strategies: evidence from the pacific basin stock markets. J. Financ. Res. 45, 383–398 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao, Y., Chu, H.H., Ko, K.C., Lin, L.: Momentum strategies and investor sentiment in the REIT market. Int. Rev. Financ. 16(1), 41–71 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao, Y., Chou, R.K., Ko, K.C., Yang, N.T.: The 52-week high, momentum, and investor sentiment. Int. Rev. Financ. Anal. 57, 167–183 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, H., Stein, J.C.: A unified theory of underreaction, momentum trading, and overreaction in asset markets. J. Financ. 54(6), 2143–2184 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jegadeesh, N., Titman, S.: Returns to buying winners and selling losers: implications for stock market efficiency. J. Financ. 48(1), 65–91 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, B., Suh, S.: Sentiment-based momentum strategy. Int. Rev. Financ. Anal. 58, 52–68 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C.M., Shleifer, A., Thaler, R.H.: Investor sentiment and the closed-end fund puzzle. J. Financ. 46(1), 75–109 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linden, A., Yarnold, P.R.: Identifying causal mechanisms in health care interventions using classification tree analysis. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 24(2), 353–361 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mantalos, P., Shukur, G.: Size and power of the error correction model cointegration test. A bootstrap approach. Oxf. Bull. Econ. Stat. 60(2), 249–255 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mantalos, P.: A graphical investigation of the size and power of the Granger-causality tests in integrated-cointegrated VAR systems. Stud. Nonlinear Dyn. Econ. (2000). https://doi.org/10.2202/1558-3708.1053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosconi, R., Seri, R.: Non-causality in bivariate binary time series. J. Econ. 132(2), 379–407 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz, T.J., Ooi, Y.H., Pedersen, L.H.: Time-series momentum. J. Financ. Econ. 104(2), 228–250 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J.Y., Phillips, P.C.: Statistical inference in regressions with integrated processes: part 1. Economet. Theor. 4(3), 468–497 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran, M.H., Timmermann, A.: Small sample properties of forecasts from autoregressive models under structural breaks. J. Econom. 129(1–2), 183–217 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouwenhorst, K.G.: International momentum strategies. J. Financ. 53(1), 267–284 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahzad, S.J.H., Nor, S.M., Hammoudeh, S., Shahbaz, M.: Directional and bidirectional causality between U.S. industry credit and stock markets and their determinants. Int. Rev. Econom. Financ. 47, 46–61 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiller, R.J.: Measuring bubble expectations and investor confidence. J. Psychol. Financ. Markets 1(1), 49–60 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shukur, G., Mantalos, P.: Tests for Granger causality in integrated-cointegrated VAR systems. Working paper 1998:1, Department of Statistics, University of Lund, Sweden (1997)

  • Shukur, G., Mantalos, P.: A simple investigation of the Granger-causality test in integrated-cointegrated VAR systems. J. Appl. Stat. 27(8), 1021–1031 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shukur, G., Mantalos, P.: Size and power of the RESET test as applied to systems of equations: a bootstrap approach. J. Mod. Appl. Stat. Methods 3(2), 10 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toda, H. Y., Phillips, P. C.: Vector autoregressions and causality. Econom. J. Econom. Soc. 1367–1393 (1993)

  • Toda, H.Y., Phillips, P.C.: Vector autoregression and causality: a theoretical overview and simulation study. Economet. Rev. 13(2), 259–285 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toda, H.Y., Yamamoto, T.: Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. J. Econom. 66(1–2), 225–250 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julien Chevallier.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest.

Data availability

Data are available on request.

Code availability

Codes are available on request.

Ethics approval

The authors declare that this study is in consistence with the ethics of scientific research.

Consent for publication

The authors express their consent to participate in the paper and declare that they agree to publish this paper in the Annals of Finance.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nakhli, M.S., Dhaoui, A. & Chevallier, J. Bootstrap rolling-window Granger causality dynamics between momentum and sentiment: implications for investors. Ann Finance 18, 267–283 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10436-021-00399-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10436-021-00399-z

Keywords

Navigation