Skip to main content
Log in

Automating microfluidic part verification

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Microfluidics and Nanofluidics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microfluidic devices promise to significantly advance the field of medicine by providing diagnostic tools that may be administered at the point-of-care (POC). Currently, a major barrier to entry for POC microfluidic diagnostic technologies is part qualification where specific features of a microfluidic technology must be qualified during the manufacturing process to ensure the device performs properly, e.g., Tantra and van Heeren (Lab Chip 13:2199, 2013). Additionally, microfluidic device research is moving toward therapeutic applications where quality control requirements may be more stringent. In this paper, we use soft embossing—a replication technology—to manufacture high aspect ratio thermoplastic deterministic lateral displacement (DLD) parts, where DLD is a size-based microfluidic particle separation technology based on shift post arrays. Morphological data are collected using optical profilometry, and key metrics are automatically extracted using a novel image analysis algorithm. This algorithm allows us to rapidly quantify the average post height, post shape, array pitch and surface roughness in order to compare a lot of 12 devices to the original design and the deep reactive ion etched silicon master mold. During the run of 12 devices, the post height was 63.0 ± 5.1 μm (mean ± 6σ), the pitch was 35.6 ± 0.31 μm, the post eccentricity was 0.503 ± 0.197, the post circularity was 1.195 ± 0.084 and the root-mean-square surface roughness was 4.19 ± 3.39 μm. Importantly, this automated part qualification technique reduced data analysis time by 75- to 100-fold while allowing for additional qualification metrics and significantly reducing the need for manual measurement. Overall, this paper indicates that it is possible to improve the quality and efficiency of microfluidic part qualification using optical profilometry coupled with a novel image analysis algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

σ :

Standard deviation

θ :

Tilt angle

\(\ominus \) :

Image erosion

\(\oplus \) :

Image dilation

3D:

Three-dimensional

a :

Major axis length

A :

Area

b :

Minor axis length

c :

Circularity

CPU:

Central processing unit

CSV:

Comma separated value

DLD:

Deterministic lateral displacement

e :

Eccentricity

DRIE:

Deep reactive ion etching

E :

Euclidean space

f(x, y):

Planar surface fit

\(f_{\mathrm{max}}\) :

Maximum f(x, y) value

\(f_{\mathrm{min}}\) :

Maximum f(x, y) value

I :

Image

P :

Perimeter

\(p_0\) :

X-coefficient for the surface fit

\(p_1\) :

Y-coefficient for the surface fit

\(p_2\) :

Z-coefficient for the surface fit

PDMS:

Polydimethylsiloxane

PO:

Polyolefin

POC:

Point-of-care

PQ:

Part qualification

QC:

Quality control

RAM:

Random access memory

S :

Structured element

\(S_z\) :

Translation of S to position z

\(s(\theta =0)\) :

s(x, y) without tilt

\(s(\theta =0)_{\mathrm{corr}}\) :

\(s(\theta =0)\) with minimum value of 0

s(x,y):

Surface contour data

SEM:

Scanning electron micrograph

References

  • Aline microfluidics (2014) capabilities brochure. http://www.alineinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/aline_capabilities_brochure.pdf

  • Attia UM, Marson S, Alcock JR (2009) Micro-injection moulding of polymer microfluidic devices. Microfluidics Nanofluidics 7(1):1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu AS (2013) Droplet morphometry and velocimetry (dmv): a video processing software for time-resolved, label-free tracking of droplet parameters. Lab Chip 13:1892–1901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berthier E, Young EWK, Beebe D (2012) Engineers are from PDMS-land, biologists are from polystyrenia. Lab Chip 12(7):1224–1237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claxton NS, Fellers TJ, Davidson MW (2006) Laser scanning confocal microscopy. Department of Optical Microscopy and Digital Imaging, National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, The Florida State University

  • Deck L, De Groot P (1994) High-speed non-contact profiler based on scanning white-light interferometry. Appl Opt 33(31):7334–7338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goral VN, Hsieh Y-C, Petzold ON, Faris RA, Yuen PK (2011) Hot embossing of plastic microfluidic devices using poly (dimethylsiloxane) molds. J Micromech Microeng 21(1):017002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardt DE, Ganesan B, Qi W, Dirckx M, Rzepniewski AK (2004) Process control in micro-embossing: a review. Innov Manuf Syst Technol

  • Hardt DE, Anthony BW, Tor SB (2010) A teaching factory for polymer microfabrication-μfac. Int J Nanomanuf 6(1):137–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang LR, Cox EC, Austin RH, Sturm JC (2004) Continuous particle separation through deterministic lateral displacement. Science 304(5673):987–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglis DW, Davis JA, Austin RH, Sturm JC (2006) Critical particle size for fractionation by deterministic lateral displacement. Lab Chip 6(5):655–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglis DW (2010) A method for reducing pressure-induced deformation in silicone microfluidics. Biomicrofluidics 4(2):026504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koo J, Kleinstreuer C (2003) Liquid flow in microchannels: experimental observations and computational analyses of microfluidics effects. J Micromech Microeng 13(5):568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laser DJ, Santiago JG (2004) A review of micropumps. J Micromech Microeng 14(6):R35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mital A, Govindaraju M, Subramani B (1998) A comparison between manual and hybrid methods in parts inspection. Integr Manuf Syst 9(6):344–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moeller H-C, Mian MK, Shrivastava S, Chung BG, Khademhosseini A (2008) A microwell array system for stem cell culture. Biomaterials 29(6):752–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagrath S, Sequist LV, Maheswaran S, Bell DW, Irimia D, Ulkus L, Smith MR, Kwak EL, Digumarthy S, Muzikansky A et al (2007) Isolation of rare circulating tumour cells in cancer patients by microchip technology. Nature 450(7173):1235–1239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh KW, Ahn CH (2006) A review of microvalves. J Micromech Microeng 16(5):R13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawell RS, Barber TJ, Inglis DW, Taylor RA (2013) Limits of parabolic flow theory in microfluidic particle separation: a computational study. In: ASME 2013 4th international conference on micro/nanoscale heat and mass transfer. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp V001T10A002–V001T10A002

  • Pawell RS, Inglis DW, Barber TJ, Taylor RA (2013) Manufacturing and wetting low-cost microfluidic cell separation devices. Biomicrofluidics 7(5):056501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzbauer T, Welk M, Mayrhofer C, Schubert R (2013) Automated quality inspection of microfluidic chips using morphologic techniques. In: Mathematical morphology and its applications to signal and image processing. Springer, Berlin, pp 508–519

  • Sharei A, Zoldan J, Adamo A, Sim WY, Cho N, Jackson E, Mao S, Schneider S, Han M-J, Lytton-Jean A et al (2013) A vector-free microfluidic platform for intracellular delivery. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110(6):2082–2087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tantra R, van Heeren H (2013) Product qualification: a barrier to point-of-care microfluidic-based diagnostics? Lab Chip 13(12):2199–2201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitesides GM (2006) The origins and the future of microfluidics. Nature 442(7101):368–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitesides GM (2013) Cool, or simple and cheap? why not both? Lab Chip 13(1):11–13

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Worgull M (2009) Hot embossing: theory and technology of microreplication. William Andrew, Oxford, UK

  • Yeo LP, Ng SH, Wang ZF, Xia HM, Wang ZP, Thang VS, Zhong ZW, de Rooij NF (2010) Investigation of hot roller embossing for microfluidic devices. J Micromech Microeng 20(1):015017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young EWK, Berthier E, Guckenberger DJ, Sackmann E, Lamers C, Meyvantsson I, Huttenlocher A, Beebe DJ (2011) Rapid prototyping of arrayed microfluidic systems in polystyrene for cell-based assays. Anal Chem 83(4):1408–1417

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially funded by the Australian Research Council (DP0110102207). The DRIE work was performed in part at the New South Wales node of the Australian National Fabrication Facility, a company established under the National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy to provide nano- and micro-fabrication facilities for Australians researchers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryan S. Pawell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pawell, R.S., Taylor, R.A., Morris, K.V. et al. Automating microfluidic part verification. Microfluid Nanofluid 18, 657–665 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-014-1464-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-014-1464-1

Keywords

Navigation