Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Relationship between detection of the cervical gland area during the late third trimester and necessity for induction of labor to prevent post-term delivery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

With the maturation of the cervical canal during pregnancy, the cervical gland area (CGA) as observed on transvaginal ultrasonography is gradually obscured. The aim of this study was to elucidate the significance of CGA in the late third trimester as a determinant of the outcome of labor.

Methods

We investigated 123 primiparous women with singleton pregnancies at 36–41 weeks’ gestation. The women were divided into two groups: a normal delivery group (93 women), which had vaginal delivery without medical intervention, and an induction of labor group (30 women), which required induction of labor after 41 weeks and 0 day. At outpatient prenatal checkups, the Bishop score (BS) was assessed by pelvic examination, and cervical length (CL) and CGA were evaluated by transvaginal ultrasonography. The relationship between each parameter and induction of labor was retrospectively determined and compared.

Results

Time-dependent assessment of each outcome determinant showed that the CGA detection rate was higher and the CL was longer in the induction of labor group from 3 weeks to 1 week before delivery at a significant level (P < 0.05); however, the BS was significantly lower in the induction of labor group only at 1 week before delivery (P < 0.05). When multiple logistic regression analysis of the necessity of induction of labor was conducted using BS, CL, and CGA parameters as explanatory variables at 1 week before delivery, CGA alone was shown to be an independent predictor of induction of labor (OR = 6.1, 95 % CI 2.3–16.2).

Conclusion

The present study suggests that in the late third trimester, evaluation of CGA with transvaginal ultrasonography is most useful in predicting the necessity of induction of labor to prevent post-term delivery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bishop EH. Pelvic scoring for elective induction. Obstet Gynecol. 1964;24:266–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sonek JD, Iams JD, Blumenfeld M, et al. Measurement of cervical length in pregnancy: comparison between vaginal ultrasonography and digital examination. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;76:172–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson HF, Nugent CE, Wanty SD, et al. Prediction of risk for preterm delivery by ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;163:859–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sonek J, Shellhaas C. Cervical sonography: a review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998;11:71–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sekiya T, Ishihara K, Yoshimatsu K, et al. Detection rate of the cervical gland area during pregnancy by transvaginal sonography in the assessment of cervical maturation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998;12:328–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yoshimatsu K, Sekiya T, Ishihara K, et al. Detection of the cervical gland area in threatened preterm labor using transvaginal sonography in the assessment of cervical maturation and the outcome of pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2002;53:149–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fukami T, Ishihara K, Sekiya T, et al. Is transvaginal ultrasonography at mid-trimester useful for predicting early spontaneous preterm birth? J Nippon Med Sch. 2003;70:135–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pires CR, Moron AF, Mattar R, et al. Cervical gland area as an ultrasonographic marker for preterm delivery. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2006;93:214–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Asakura H, Fukami T, Kurashina R, et al. Significance of cervical gland area in predicting preterm birth for patients with threatened preterm delivery: comparison with cervical length and fetal fibronectin. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2009;68:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. To MS, Skentou C, Liao AW, et al. Cervical length and funneling at 23 weeks of gestation in the prediction of spontaneous early preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;18:200–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Guzman ER, Walters C, Ananth CV, et al. A comparison of sonographic cervical parameters in predicting spontaneous preterm birth in high-risk singleton gestations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;18:204–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Morikawa H, Mochizuki M, Satoh, et al. Studies on the relationship between the cervical ripening in the third trimester and the progress in labor by a prospectively registration method: Part 2 relationship between Bishop score in the third trimester and the progress of labor or neonatal clinical findings. Acta Obstet Gynecol Jpn. 2001;53:1809–18.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Park KH. Transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement in predicting failed labor induction and cesarean delivery for failure to progress in nulliparous women. J Korean Med Sci. 2007;22:722–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Pandis GK, Papageorghiou AT, Ramanathan VG, et al. Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;18:623–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tan PC, Vallikkannu N, Suguna S, et al. Transvaginal sonography of cervical length and Bisop score as predictors of successful induction of term labor: the effect of parity. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2009;36:35–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chun WC, Tak YL, Daljit SS, et al. Outcome of induction of labor using meternal characteristics, ultrasound assessment and biochemical state of the cervix. J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;23:1406–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Crane JMG. Factors predicting labor induction success: a critical analysis. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;49:573–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chad AG, Mordechai D, John PG, et al. Transvaginal ultrasound of cervical length and its correlation to digital cervical examination, time to spontaneous labor and mode of delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;284:855–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dietz HP, Lanzarone V, Simpson JM. Predicting operative delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;27:409–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim SN, Park KH, Jung HJ, et al. Clinical and sonographic parameters at 37 weeks’ gestation for predicting the risk of primary Cesarean delivery in nulliparous women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;36:486–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, et al. Postterm pregnancy. In: Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, et al., editors. Williams obstetrics. 22nd ed. New York: Mc Graw-Hill Medical; 2005. p. 881–92.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ito A, Kitamura K, Mori Y, et al. The change in solubility of type I collagen in human uterine cervix in pregnancy at term. Biochem Med. 1979;21:262–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kitamura K, Ito A, Mori Y. The existing forms of collagenase in the human uterine cervix. J Biochem. 1980;87:753–60.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Strobel E, Sladkevcius P, Rovas L, et al. Bishop score and ultrasound assessment of the cervix for prediction of time to onesetob labor and time to delivery in prolonged pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;28:298–305.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Miura H, Ogawa M, Hirano H, et al. Time-related changes of cervical length as a predictor of labor onset within one week using transvaginal ultrasonography. Acta Obstet Gynecol. 2010;89:757–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. M. Ghazizadeh, Associate Professor, Institute of Development and Aging Sciences, Nippon Medical School, for his careful review and revision of our manuscript.

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical considerations

The institutional review board approval was obtained from the local ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all participating women before performing transvaginal ultrasonography.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan

    Yukito Minami, Takao Sekiya, Haruki Nishizawa, Jun Miyazaki, Yoshiteru Noda, Risa Ishii, Eiji Nishio, Yasuhiro Udagawa & Takuma Fujii

  2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Suzuki Hospital, Aichi, Japan

    Akira Yasue

Authors
  1. Yukito Minami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Takao Sekiya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Haruki Nishizawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jun Miyazaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yoshiteru Noda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Risa Ishii
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Akira Yasue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Eiji Nishio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yasuhiro Udagawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Takuma Fujii
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takao Sekiya.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Minami, Y., Sekiya, T., Nishizawa, H. et al. Relationship between detection of the cervical gland area during the late third trimester and necessity for induction of labor to prevent post-term delivery. J Med Ultrasonics 41, 463–471 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-014-0552-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-014-0552-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation