Abstract
Purpose
To compare sonazoid-enhanced ultrasound (SEUS) and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) enhancement and washout patterns in hepatic lesions.
Methods
Enhancement and washout patterns on SEUS were compared with those on CECT for 61 lesions. There were 36 hepatocellular carcinomas, three intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, three metastatic lesions, eight focal nodular hyperplasias, two angiomyolipomas, and nine undetermined benign lesions. Diagnosis was based on histopathology, or CECT and tumor markers, or findings on 2-year follow-up.
Results
All 61 lesions (100%) showed arterial enhancement on both SEUS and CECT. The “washout/no washout” agreement between SEUS and CECT for the 61 lesions was 93.4% (κ coefficient: 0.816). Of the 42 malignant lesions, 38 lesions (90.5%) showed washout on both SEUS and CECT. The remaining four malignant lesions, of which three lesions contained fibrosis (two intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas and one scirrhous hepatocellular carcinoma), showed washout on SEUS but not on CECT. For the 19 benign lesions, agreement between SEUS and CECT was 100% (κ coefficient: 1), with seven lesions showing washout with both methods and 12 lesions showing no washout with both methods.
Conclusion
The overall concordance rate between SEUS and CECT was good, but some differences were seen in the washout patterns of malignant lesions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Claudon M, Cosgrove D, Albrecht T, et al. Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)-update 2008. Ultraschall Med. 2008;29:28–44.
Burns PN, Wilson SR. Focal liver masses: enhancement patterns on contrast-enhanced images-concordance of US scans with CT scans and MRI images. Radiology. 2007;242:162–74.
Wilson SR, Kim TK, Jang H-J, et al. Enhancement patterns of focal liver masses: discordance between of contrast enhanced ultrasounds and enhanced CT and MRI. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:W7–12.
Li R, Guo Y, Hua X, et al. Characterization of focal liver hepatic lesions: comparison of pulse-inversion harmonic contrast-enhanced sonography with contrast-enhanced CT. J Clin Ultrasound. 2007;35:109–17.
Chen LD, Xu H-X, Xie X-Y, et al. Enhancement patterns of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: comparison between contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced CT. Br J Radiol. 2008;81:881–9.
Yanagisawa K, Moriyasu F, Miyahara T, et al. Phagocytosis of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles by kupffer cells. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007;33:318–25.
D`Onofrio M, Vecchiato F, Cantisani V, et al. Intrahepatic peripheral cholangiocarcinoma (IPCC): comparison between perfusion ultrasound and CT imaging. Radiol Med. 2008;113:6–86.
Yoshikawa J, Matsui O, Kadoya M, et al. Delayed enhancement of fibrotic areas in hepatic masses: CT-pathological correlation. J Comput Assisted Tomography. 1992;16:206–11.
Kim SH, Lim HK, Lee WJ, et al. Scirrhous hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison with usual hepatocellular carcinoma based on CT-pathologic features and long term results after curative resection. Eur J Radiol. 2007;69:123–30.
Fan Z-H, Chen M-H, Dai Y, et al. Evaluation of primary malignancies of the liver using contrast-enhanced sonography: correlation with pathology. Am J Roentgenol. 2006;86:1512–9.
Kim TK, Jang H-J, Burns PN, et al. Focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatic adenoma: differentiation with low-mechanical index contrast-enhanced sonography. Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:58–66.
Ungermann L, Elias P, Zizka J, et al. Focal nodular hyperplasia: spoke–wheel arterial pattern and other signs on dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Eur J Radiol. 2007;63:290–4.
Brancatelli G, Federle MP, Grazioli L, et al. Focal nodular hyperplasia: CT findings with emphasis on multiphasic helical CT in 78 patients. Radiology. 2001;219:61–8.
Lin L-W, Yang J-J, Lin X-Y, et al. Effect of fatty liver background on contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic appearance of focal nodular hyperplasia. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2007;6:610–5.
Wang Z, Xu H-X, Xie X-Y, et al. Imaging features of hepatic angiomyolipomas on real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Br J Radiol. 2009. doi:10.1259/bjr/81174247.
Ren N, Qin L-X, Tang Z-Y, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of hepatic angiomyolipoma in 26 cases. World J Gastoenterol. 2003;9:1856–8.
Yoshimura H, Murakami T, Kim T, et al. Angiomyolipoma of the liver with least amount of fat component: imaging features of CT, MR and angiography. Abdom Imaging. 2002;27:184–7.
Yen Y-H, Wang J-H, Lu S-N, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in hepatic angiomyolipoma. J Ultrasound Med. 2005;24:855–9.
Flor N, Sardanelli F, Serantoni S, et al. Low-fat angiomyolipoma of the liver studied with contrast-enhanced ultrasound and multidetector computed tomography. Acta Radiol. 2006;47:543–6.
Yamamoto Y, Fujiwara Y, Yukisawa S, et al. Three cases of angiomyolipoma: diagnostic imaging by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. J Med Ultrasonics. 2010;37:67–74.
Zheng RQ, Kudo M. Hepatic angiomyolipoma: identification of an efferent vessel to be hepatic vein by contrast-enhanced harmonic ultrasound. Br J Radiol. 2005;78:956–60.
Saito A, Chiba M, Komiya T, et al. Hepatic nodule hemodynamics using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. J Hepatol. 2008;48:S156.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Patel, S., Saito, A., Yoneda, Y. et al. Comparing enhancement and washout patterns of hepatic lesions between sonazoid-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced computed tomography. J Med Ultrasonics 37, 167–173 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-010-0277-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-010-0277-4