Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Surgical attempts to avoid anastomotic leaks and reduce reflux esophagitis following esophagectomy for cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Esophagus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

We analyzed the results of our surgical attempts to establish a safe reconstruction after esophagectomy for cancer that withstands both early and subsequent complications.

Methods

Patients who underwent an intrathoracic or cervical esophagogastrostomy were selected. We preserved the esophagus keeping an oral margin of at least 3 cm and made an anastomosis with the gastric wall as low as possible to avoid an anastomotic leak. We included an antireflux procedure in the intrathoracic anastomosis. We examined the effect of these surgical approaches in three patient groups: one group with cervical anastomosis (CA group, n = 21), and the other two groups with intrathoracic anastomosis after resection of cancer in the upper or middle thoracic esophagus (UM group, n = 104) or in the lower thoracic or abdominal esophagus (LA group, n = 30).

Results

No leak was found in the esophagogastric anastomosis in any group. A gastric suture line dehiscence developed in two cases in the UM group. Postoperative endoscopy revealed that mean anastomotic height in the UM group was 4.1 cm lower than in the CA group (P < 0.0001) and 2.1 cm higher than in the LA group (P = 0.0006). The incidence of reflux esophagitis was 0% in the CA group, 43% in the UM group, and 37% in the LA group, with significant differences between the CA group and the other groups.

Conclusions

Our surgical attempts to avoid leaks of esophagogastrostomy were entirely successful. An intrathoracic anastomosis combined with an antireflux procedure was not advantageous for the incidence of reflux esophagitis compared to cervical anastomosis, but it minimized the effects of anastomotic height on the development of reflux esophagitis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fujita H, Kakegawa T, Yamana H, Shima I, Tanaka H, Ikeda S, et al. Lymph node metastasis and recurrence in patients with a carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus who underwent three-field dissection. World J Surg 1994;18:266–272.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Igaki H, Tachimori Y, Kato H. Improved survival for patients with upper and/or middle mediastinal lymph node metastasis of squamous cell carcinoma of the lower thoracic esophagus treated with 3-field dissection. Ann Surg 2004;239:483–490.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Domergue J, Veyrac M, Huin-Yan S, Rouanet P, Collet H, Michel H, et al. pH monitoring for 24 hours of gastroesophageal reflux and gastric function after intrathoracic gastroplasty after esophagectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990;171:107–110.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Morton KA, Karwande SV, Davis RK, Datz FL, Lynch RE. Gastric emptying after gastric interposition for cancer of the esophagus or hypopharynx. Ann Thorac Surg 1991;51:759–763.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Schmidt CE, Bestmann B, Kuchler T, Schmid A, Kremer B. Quality of life associated with surgery for esophageal cancer: differences between collar and intrathoracic anastomoses. World J Surg 2004;28:355–360.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tsutsui S, Kuwano H, Watanabe M, Kitamura M, Sugimachi K. Resection margin for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Ann Surg 1995;222:193–202.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Armstrong D, Bennett JR, Blum AL, Dent J, De Dombal FT, Galmiche JP, et al. The endoscopic assessment of esophagitis: a progress report on observer agreement. Gastroenterology 1996;111:85–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lam TC, Fok M, Cheng SW, Wong J. Anastomotic complications after esophagectomy for cancer. A comparison of neck and chest anastomoses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992;104:395–400.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Goldfaden D, Orringer MB, Appelman HD, Kalish R. Adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus and gastric cardia: comparison of results of transhiatal esophagectomy and thoracoabdominal esophagogastrectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1982;91:242–247.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chasseray VM, Kiroff GK, Buard JL, Launois B. Cervical or thoracic anastomosis for esophagectomy for carcinoma. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1989;169:55–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Vigneswaran WT, Trastek VF, Pairolero PC, Deschamps C, Daly RC, Allen MS. Transhiatal esophagectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;56:838–846.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Muller JM, Erasmi H, Stelzner M, Zieren U, Pichlmaier H. Surgical therapy of oesophageal carcinoma. Br J Surg 1990;77:845–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Daniel TM, Fleischer KJ, Flanagan TL, Tribble CG, Kron IL. Transhiatal esophagectomy: a safe alternative for selected patients. Ann Thorac Surg 1992;54:686–689.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tilanus HW, Hop WC, Langenhorst BL, van Lanschot JJ. Esophagectomy with or without thoracotomy. Is there any difference? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;105:898–903.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Patil PK, Patel SG, Mistry RC, Deshpande RK, Desai PB. Cancer of the esophagus: esophagogastric anastomotic leak. A retrospective study of predisposing factors. J Surg Oncol 1992;49:163–167.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Shahian DM, Neptune WB, Ellis FH Jr, Watkins E Jr. Transthoracic versus extrathoracic esophagectomy: mortality, morbidity, and long-term survival. Ann Thorac Surg 1986;41:237–246.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Crestanello JA, Deschamps C, Cassivi SD, Nichols FC, Allen MS, Schleck C, et al. Selective management of intrathoracic anastomotic leak after esophagectomy. J Thorac Cardiovascular Surg 2005;129:254–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Martin LW, Hofstetter W, Swisher SG, Roth JA. Management of intrathoracic leaks following esophagectomy. Adv Surg 2006;40:173–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Peterson IM, Wong J. Anastomotic leakage: an avoidable complication of Lewis-Tanner oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 1989;76:127–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nishikawa M, Murakami T, Tangoku A, Hayashi H, Adachi J, Suzuki T. Functioning of the intrathoracic stomach after esophagectomy. Arch Surg 1994;129:837–841.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lortat-Jacob JL, Maillard JN, Fekete F. A procedure to prevent reflux after esophagogastric resection: experience with 17 patients. Surgery (St. Louis) 1961;50:600–611.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pearson FG, Henderson RD, Parrish RM. An operative technique for the control of reflux following esophagogastrostomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1969;58:668–677.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Demos NJ, Biele RM. Intercostal pedicle method for control of postresection esophagitis. Thirteen-year clinical study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1980;80:679–685.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yalav E, Ercan S. Reservoir and globe-type antireflux surgical techniques in intrathoracic esophagogastrostomies. Dis Esophagus 2000;13:282–287.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Shibuya S, Fukudo S, Shineha R, Miyazaki S, Miyata G, Sugawara K, et al. High incidence of reflux esophagitis observed by routine endoscopic examination after gastric pull-up esophagectomy. World J Surg 2003;27:580–583.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Belsey R. Reconstruction of the esophagus. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1983;65:360–364.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fujita H, Kakegawa T, Yamana H, Shima I, Toh Y, Tomita Y, et al. Mortality and morbidity rates, postoperative course, quality of life, and prognosis after extended radical lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Comparison of three-field lymphadenectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy. Ann Surg 1995;222:654–662.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery II, National Defense Medical College, 3-2 Namiki, Tokorozawa, Saitama, 359-8513, Japan

    Satoshi Aiko, Yutaka Yoshizumi, Hitoshi Ogawa, Takamitsu Ishizuka, Takuya Horio, Norishige Kanai, Takefumi Nakayama & Tadaaki Maehara

Authors
  1. Satoshi Aiko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yutaka Yoshizumi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hitoshi Ogawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Takamitsu Ishizuka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Takuya Horio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Norishige Kanai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Takefumi Nakayama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Tadaaki Maehara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satoshi Aiko.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aiko, S., Yoshizumi, Y., Ogawa, H. et al. Surgical attempts to avoid anastomotic leaks and reduce reflux esophagitis following esophagectomy for cancer. Esophagus 5, 141–148 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-008-0165-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-008-0165-9

Key words

Search

Navigation