Abstract
Purpose
To investigate the impact of using digital assisted vitrectomy (DAV) for color enhancement in color channel and achromatization in color profile on the visibility of indocyanine green (ICG)-stained internal limiting membrane (ILM).
Study design
Retrospective observational study.
Methods
Twenty eyes from 20 patients (7 men, 13 women) who underwent 27-gauge pars plana vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane removal were included. The presettings of five different imaging modes of the NGENUITY® 3D visualization system (Alcon laboratories, Inc.), were adjusted, and intraoperative images of ILM removal were captured under each presetting. The color contrast ratios (CCR) between the ICG-stained ILM area and peeled ILM area were compared across presettings objectively. Subjective visibility of ILM in each patient for different presettings was ranked using a Likert scale and evaluated by five examiners. Data on sex, age, preoperative and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), preoperative and postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP), and postoperative complications were analyzed.
Results
Compared to other presettings the best CCR was achieved by adjusting the color channel to enhance red and by modifying the color profile to create a monochrome image (P<0.01). The same presetting resulted in a highest subjective visibility (P<0.01). Mean preoperative BCVA and 6-month postoperative BCVA (logMAR) were 0.11±0.18 and 0.05±0.19, respectively (p=0.24). Mean preoperative IOP and 6-month postoperative IOP were 13.8±2.8 mmHg and 13.3±3.4 mmHg, respectively (p=0.51). No apparent intra- and post-operative complications were observed.
Conclusion
Color enhancement and achromatization using DAV may offer potential advantages to enhance the visibility of ICG-stained ILM.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Eckardt C, Eckardt U, Groos S, Luciano L, Reale E. Entfernung der Membrana limitans interna bei Makulalöchern. Klinische und morphologische Befunde [Removal of the internal limiting membrane in macular holes. Clinical and morphological findings]. Ophthalmologe. 1997;94:545–51 (in German)
de Bustros S, Thompson JT, Michels RG, Rice TA, Glaser BM. Vitrectomy for idiopathic epiretinal membranes causing macular pucker. Br J Ophthalmol. 1988;72:692–5.
Park DW, Dugel PU, Garda J, Sipperley JO, Thach A, Sneed SR, et al. Macular pucker removal with and without internal limiting membrane peeling: pilot study. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:62–4.
Bovey EH, Uffer S, Achache F. Surgery for epimacular membrane: impact of retinal internal limiting membrane removal on functional outcome. Retina. 2004;24:728–35.
Sandali O, El Sanharawi M, Basli E, Bonnel S, Lecuen N, Barale P-O, et al. Epiretinal membrane recurrence: incidence, characteristics, evolution, and preventive and risk factors. Retina. 2013;33:2032–8.
Schechet SA, DeVience E, Thompson JT. The effect of internal limiting membrane peeling on idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery, with a review of the literature. Retina. 2017;37:873–80.
Michalewska Z, Michalewski J, Adelman RA, Nawrocki J. Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for large macular holes. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:2018–25.
Morizane Y, Shiraga F, Kimura S, Hosokawa M, Shiode Y, Kawata T, et al. Autologous transplantation of the internal limiting membrane for refractory macular holes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;157:861-9.e1.
Shimada N, Sugamoto Y, Ogawa M, Takase H, Ohno-Matsui K. Fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling for myopic traction maculopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;154:693–701.
Moroi SE, Gottfredsdottir MS, Van Heck T, Musch DC, Johnson MW. Visual field results after vitreous surgery in a case series of patients with open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalm Surg Lasers. 2000;31:380–6.
Tsuchiya S, Higashide T, Sugiyama K. Visual field changes after vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling for epiretinal membrane or macular hole in glaucomatous eyes. PLoS ONE. 2017;12: e0177526.
Kadonosono K, Itoh N, Uchio E, Nakamura S, Ohno S. Staining of internal limiting membrane in macular hole surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:1116–8.
Enaida H, Hisatomi T, Hata Y, Ueno A, Goto Y, Yamada T, et al. Brilliant blue G selectively stains the internal limiting membrane/brilliant blue G-assisted membrane peeling. Retina. 2006;26:631–6.
Perrier M, Sébag M. Trypan blue-assisted peeling of the internal limiting membrane during macular hole surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135:903–5.
Farah ME, Maia M, Penha FM, Rodrigues EB. The use of vital dyes during vitreoretinal surgery—chromovitrectomy. Dev Ophthalmol. 2016;55:365–75.
Eckardt C, Paulo EB. Heads-up surgery for vitreoretinal procedures: an experimental and clinical study. Retina. 2016;36:137–47.
Park SJ, Do JR, Shin JP, Park DH. Customized color settings of digitally assisted vitreoretinal surgery to enable use of lower dye concentrations during macular surgery. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;8: 810070.
Imai H, Tetsumoto A, Inoue S, Takano F, Yamada H, Hayashida M, et al. Intraoperative three-dimensional fluorescein angiography-guided pars plana vitrectomy for the treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy: the maximized utility of the digital assisted vitrectomy. Retina. 2023;43:359–62.
Imai H, Tetsumoto A, Yamada H, Hayashida M, Otsuka K, Miki A, et al. Intraoperative three-dimensional fluorescein angiography-guided pars plana vitrectomy for branch retinal vein occlusion. Retin Cases Brief Rep. 2022;16:802–5.
Kadonosono K, Arakawa A, Inoue M, Yamane S, Uchio E, Yamakawa T, et al. Internal limiting membrane contrast after staining with indocyanine green and brilliant blue G during macular surgery. Retina. 2013;33:812–7.
Bin Helayel H, Al-Mazidi S, AlAkeely A. Can the three-dimensional heads-up display improve ergonomics, surgical performance, and ophthalmology training compared to conventional microscopy? Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:679–86.
Weinstock RJ, Ainslie-Garcia MH, Ferko NC, Qadeer RA, Morris LP, Cheng H, et al. Comparative assessment of ergonomic experience with heads-up display and conventional surgical microscope in the operating room. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:347–56.
Funding
This work supported by a grant from Alcon, Japan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
H. Imai, None; Y. Iwane, None; M. Kishi, None; Y. Sotani, None; H. Yamada, None; W. Matsumiya, None; A. Miki, None; S. Kusuhara, None; M. Nakamura, None.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Corresponding Author: Hisanori Imai
About this article
Cite this article
Imai, H., Iwane, Y., Kishi, M. et al. Color enhancement and achromatization to increase the visibility of indocyanine green-stained internal limiting membrane during digitally assisted vitreoretinal surgery. Jpn J Ophthalmol 68, 105–111 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-023-01042-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-023-01042-2