Abstract
During the financial crisis numerous European governments decided to rescue domestic banks with public funds to prevent a collapse of the banking system. To internalize the public costs, bank levies have been introduced in many countries. This paper analyzes the German bank levy which was implemented from 2011 till 2014. We examine not only if banks shift the cost of the levy to their customers’ lending rates, but also whether there are spillovers to their local competitors. The German savings and cooperative banks are a perfect setting to study such effects as they only operate within well-defined regions, allowing us to identify their local competitors. Additionally, only some of them are subject to the levy due to a tax allowance. Firstly, we find that a bank that has to pay the bank levy raises its lending rate by about 0.14 percentage points. Secondly, we examine whether the increased lending rates of paying banks spill over to their local competitors. We find this indirect effect to be about one third of the size. Lastly, adverse effects of the levy on paying banks’ loan supply growth are absorbed by their competitors to a certain extent.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Furthermore, the German bank levy taxes the derivative exposure of banks. However, we refrain from focusing on this part of the bank levy as no data are available for German savings and cooperative banks. Further, these banking groups are not very active in derivative trading.
Available online: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_der_Sparkassen_in_Deutschland.
For savings banks there is a complete list of mergers available at German Wikipedia.
A NUTS 2 region has a population between 800,000 and 3 million persons and usually includes several counties. We use the 2010 NUTS version.
These are aggregations of NUTS3 regions. They are created based on economic interdependencies between districts.
If we specify the variable to be the ratio of competitors who are paying the banking levy, the variable is nearly binary anyway. Less than 5% of the observations are between zero and one. Still, our results are even stronger if we use the ratio specification of the variable.
References
Aiyar S, Calomiris CW, Hooley J, Korniyenko Y, Wieladek T (2014a) The international transmission of bank capital requirements: evidence from the UK. J Financ Econ 113:368–382
Aiyar S, Calomiris CW, Wieladek T (2014b) Does macro-prudential regulation leak? Evidence from a UK policy experiment. J Money Credit Bank 46:181–214
Behr A, Heid F (2011) The success of bank mergers revisited. An assessment based on a matching strategy. J Empir Financ 18:117–135
Belke A, Haskamp U, Setzer R (2016) Regional bank efficiency and its effect on regional growth in normal and bad times. Econ Model 58:413–426
Buch CM, Hilberg B, Tonzer L (2016) Taxing banks: an evaluation of the german bank levy. J Bank Financ 72:52–66
Devereux MP, Johannesen N, Vella J (2015) Can taxes tame the banks? Evidence from European bank levies. Working Papers No 1325. Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation
Englmaier F, Stowasser T (2017) Electoral cycles in savings bank lending. J Eur Econ Assoc 15:296–354
European Commission (2015) State aid scoreboard 2015. Aid in the context of the financial and economic crisis. Available online
di Giovanni J, Shambaugh JC (2008) The impact of foreign interest rates on the economy: the role of the exchange rate regime. J Int Econ 74:341–361
di Giovanni J, McCrary J, von Wachter T (2009) Following Germany’s lead: using international monetary linkages to estimate the effect of monetary policy on the economy. Rev Econ Statist 91:315–331
Gropp R, Gruendl C, Guettler A (2014) The impact of public guarantees on bank risk-taking: evidence from a natural experiment. Rev Financ 18:457–488
Gruber J, Saez E (2002) The elasticity of taxable income: evidence and implications. J Publ Econ 84:1–32
Hakenes H, Hasan I, Molyneux P, Xie R (2015) Small banks and local economic development. Rev Financ 19:653–683
Hakenes H, Schnabel I (2011) Capital regulation, bank competition, and financial stability. Econ Lett 113:256–258
Hasan I, Koetter M, Wedow M (2009) Regional growth and finance in Europe: is there a quality effect of bank efficiency? J Bank Financ 33:1446–1453
IMF (2010) Financial sector taxation: the IMF’s report to the G20 and background material. Available online
Koetter M (2008) An assessment of bank merger success in Germany. German Econ Rev 9:232–264
Koetter M, Dam L (2012) Bank bailouts and moral hazard: evidence from Germany. Rev Financ Stud 25:2343–2380
Koetter M, Wedow M (2010) Finance and growth in a bank-based economy: is it quantity or quality that matters? J Int Money Financ 29:1529–1545
Kogler M (2016) On the incidence of bank levies: theory and evidence economics working paper series 1606. University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science
Laeven L, Valencia F (2013) Systemic banking crises database. IMF Econ Rev 61:225–270
Perotti E, Suarez J (2011) A Pigovian approach to liquidity regulation. Int J Central Bank 7:3–41
Schmieder C, Marsch K, Forster-van Aerssen K (2010) Does banking consolidation worsen firms’ access to credit? Evidence from the German economy. Small Business Econ 35:449–465
Slovik P, Cournéde B (2011) Macroeconomic impact of Basel III. OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 844 OECD Publishing
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haskamp, U. Spillovers of banking regulation: the effect of the German bank levy on the lending rates of regional banks and their local competitors. Int Econ Econ Policy 15, 449–466 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-017-0404-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-017-0404-4