Skip to main content
Log in

Mesh technologies and challenges in modern hernia surgery and abdominal wall repair

  • original article
  • Published:
European Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Hernia surgery is a rapidly evolving field, characterized by an abundance of mesh and fixation materials. This article aims at providing an overview of the most recent and urgent developments in mesh and scaffold technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sun P, Cheng X, Deng S, Hu Q, Sun Y, Zheng Q. Mesh fixation with glue versus suture for chronic pain and recurrence in Lichtenstein inguinal hernioplasty. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; . doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010814.pub2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Köckerling F, Bittner R, Kuthe A, Hukauf M, Mayer F, Fortelny R, Schug-Pass C. TEP or TAPP for recurrent inguinal hernia repair-register-based comparison of the outcome. Surg Endosc. 2017; . doi:10.1007/s00464-017-5416-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Tandon A, Pathak S, Lyons NJ, Nunes QM, Daniels IR, Smart NJ. Meta-analysis of closure of the fascial defect during laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2016;103(12):1598–607. doi:10.1002/bjs.10268.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Haskins IN, Voeller GR, Stoikes NF, Webb DL, Chandler RG, Phillips S, Poulose BK, Rosen MJ. Onlay with adhesive use compared to Sublay mesh placement in ventral hernia repair: was chevrel right? An Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative Analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 2017; . doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.01.048.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Azar FK, Crawford TC, Poruk KE, Farrow N, Cornell P, Nadra O, Azoury SC, Soares KC, Cooney CM, Eckhauser FE. Ventral hernia repair in patients with abdominal loss of domain: an observational study of one institution’s experience. Hernia. 2017; . doi:10.1007/s10029-017-1576-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Elstner KE, Read JW, Rodriguez-Acevedo O, Ho-Shon K, Magnussen J, Ibrahim N. Preoperative progressive pneumoperitoneum complementing chemical component relaxation in complex ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2016; doi:10.1007/s00464-016-5194-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Blair LJ, Cox TC, Huntington CR, Groene SA, Prasad T, Lincourt AE, Kercher KW, Heniford BT, Augenstein VA. The effect of component separation technique on quality of life (QOL) and surgical outcomes in complex open ventral hernia repair (OVHR). Surg Endosc. 2016; . doi:10.1007/s00464-016-5382-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chamieh J, Tan WH, Ramirez R, Nohra E, Apakama C, Symons W. Synthetic versus biologic mesh in single-stage repair of complex abdominal wall defects in a contaminated field. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2016; doi:10.1089/sur.2016.106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Majumder A, Winder JS, Wen Y, Pauli EM, Belyansky I, Novitsky YW. Comparative analysis of biologic versus synthetic mesh outcomes in contaminated hernia repairs. Surgery. 2016;160(4):828–38. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2016.04.041.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gruber-Blum S, Brand J, Keibl C, Fortelny RH, Redl H, Mayer F, Petter-Puchner AH. Abdominal wall reinforcement: biologic vs. degradable synthetic devices. Hernia. 2016; 28012032. doi:10.1007/s10029-016-1556-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Petter-Puchner AH, Fortelny RH, Silic K, Brand J, Gruber-Blum S, Redl H. Biologic hernia implants in experimental intraperitoneal onlay mesh plasty repair: the impact of proprietary collagen processing methods and fibrin sealant application on tissue integration. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(10):3245–52. doi:10.1007/s00464-011-1700-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Scott JR, Deeken CR, Martindale RG, Rosen MJ. Evaluation of a fully absorbable poly-4-hydroxybutyrate/absorbable barrier composite mesh in a porcine model of ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(9):3691–701. doi:10.1007/s00464-016-5057-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Söderbäck H, Mahteme H, Hellman P, Sandblom G. Prophylactic resorbable synthetic mesh to prevent wound dehiscence and incisional hernia in high high-risk laparotomy: a pilot study of using TIGR matrix mesh. Front Surg. 2016;18(3):28. doi:10.3389/fsurg.2016.00028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Guillaume O, Park J, Monforte X, Gruber-Blum S, Redl H, Petter-Puchner A, Teuschl AH. Fabrication of silk mesh with enhanced cytocompatibility: preliminary in vitro investigation toward cell-based therapy for hernia repair. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2016;27(2):37. doi:10.1007/s10856-015-5648-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jewell M, Daunch W, Bengtson B, Mortarino E. The development of SERI® Surgical Scaffold, an engineered biological scaffold. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015;1358(26376101):44–55. doi:10.1111/nyas.12886.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander H. Petter-Puchner.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

A.H. Petter-Puchner, S. Gruber-Blum, H. Redl, K.S. Glaser, and R.H. Fortelny declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Petter-Puchner, A.H., Gruber-Blum, S., Redl, H. et al. Mesh technologies and challenges in modern hernia surgery and abdominal wall repair. Eur Surg 49, 56–58 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-017-0470-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-017-0470-4

Keywords

Navigation