Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Where the wild things are: urbanization and income affect hunting participation in Tuscany, at the landscape scale

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Wildlife Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the last few decades, hunters decreased in Italy, reshaping human-wildlife conflicts and constraining the budget of wildlife agencies. Socioeconomic dynamics connected with modernization reduced hunter recruitment in Northern America, by changing the value orientations of the younger generations, as well as social support towards hunting. Despite similar dynamics characterized Europe in the last few decades, no study addressed their effect over the decrease in hunting participation in Mediterranean European context. We modeled the effect of the percentage of urbanized soil, the average per capita income, the aging index of residents, the ratio between utilized agricultural area and the total agricultural area, the density of farmers per hectare of utilized agricultural area, the province, and the hunting district, over the observed variation in the proportion of hunters over the resident population between 2001 and 2011, at 258 municipalities in Tuscany, Central Italy. Both the proportion of urbanized surface and the average income at each municipality showed a nonlinear, negative, association with the variation in the proportion of hunters. Our findings agree with previous studies exploring the effect of the so-called “forces of modernization” over hunting decline in Northern America. Future studies could adopt socioeconomic variables reflecting modernization to model hunting variation at the Italian level. Policy makers can therefore use these estimates to better account for the numerical decrease of hunters in wildlife management policies, tailoring financing policies for wildlife agencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amici V, Maccherini S, Santi E, Torri D, Vergari F, Del Monte M (2017) Long-term patterns of change in a vanishing cultural landscape: a GIS-based assessment. Ecol Inform 37:38–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker M, Rayens W (2003) Partial least squares for discrimination. J Chemom 17:166–173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett NJ, Roth R, Klain SC, Chan K, Christie P, Clark DA, Cullman G, Curran D, Durbin TJ, Epstein G, Greenberg A, Nelson MP, Sandlos J, Stedman R, Teel TL, Thomas R, Veríssimo D, Wyborn C (2017) Conservation social science: understanding and integrating human dimensions to improve conservation. Biol Conserv 205:93–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerri J, Mori E, Vivarelli M, Zaccaroni M (2017) Are wildlife value orientations useful tools to explain tolerance and illegal killing of wildlife by farmers in response to crop damage? Eur J Wildl Res 63:70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase LD (2016) Measurement of wildlife value orientations among diverse audiences: a multigroup confirmatory factor analysis among Hispanic and non-Hispanic White communities. Hum Dimens Wildl 21:127–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark KE, Cupp K, Phelps CL, Peterson MN, Stevenson KT, Serenari C (2017) Household dynamics of wildlife value orientations. Hum Dimens Wildl 22:483–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dayer AA, Stinchfield HM, Manfredo MJ (2007) Stories about wildlife: developing an instrument for identifying wildlife value orientations cross-culturally. Hum Dimens Wildl 12:307–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decker D, Smith C, Forstchen A, Hare D, Pomeranz E, Doyle-Capitman C, Schuler K, Organ J (2016) Governance principles for wildlife conservation in the 21st century. Conserv Lett 9:290–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emborg J, Gamborg C (2016) A wild controversy: cooperation and competition among landowners, hunters, and other outdoor recreational land-users in Denmark. Land Use Policy 59:197–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulton DC, Manfredo MJ, Lipscomb J (1996) Wildlife value orientations: a conceptual and measurement approach. Hum Dimens Wildl 1:24–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamborg C, Jensen FS (2016) Wildlife value orientations: a quantitative study of the general public in Denmark. Hum Dimens Wildl 21:34–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genovesi P, Carboneras C, Vila M, Walton P (2015) EU adopts innovative legislation on invasive species: a step towards a global response to biological invasions? Biol Invasions 17:1307–1311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert DL (1971) Natural resources and public relations (No. S944. G54 1975)

  • Heberlein TA (2012) Navigating environmental attitudes. Oxoford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heberlein TA, Ericsson G (2005) Ties to the countryside: accounting for urbanites attitudes toward hunting, wolves, and wildlife. Hum Dimens Wildl 10:213–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heberlein TA, Thomson E (1996) Changes in US hunting participation, 1980–90

  • Heberlein TA, Ericsson G, Wollscheid KU (2002) Correlates of hunting participation in Europe and North America. Z Jagdwiss 48:320–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermann N, Voß C, Menzel S (2013) Wildlife value orientations as predicting factors in support of reintroducing bison and of wolves migrating to Germany. J Nat Conserv 21:125–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herruzo AC, Martínez-Jauregui M (2013) Trends in hunters, hunting grounds and big game harvest in Spain. For Syst 22:114–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Hessen DO, Tombre IM, van GG, Alfsnes K (2017) Global change and ecosystem connectivity: how geese link fields of central Europe to eutrophication of Arctic freshwaters. Ambio 46:40–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hof A, Blázquez-Salom M (2013) The linkages between real estate tourism and urban sprawl in Majorca (Balearic Islands, Spain). Land 2:252–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hrubes D, Ajzen I, Daigle J (2001) Predicting hunting intentions and behavior: an application of the theory of planned behavior. Leis Sci 23:165–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs MH (2007) Wildlife value orientations in the Netherlands. Hum Dimens Wildl 12:359–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs MH, Vaske JJ, Teel TL, Manfredo MJ (2012) Human dimensions of wildlife. In: Steg L, Van Den Berg AE, De Groot JIM (eds) Environmental psychology: an introduction, 1st edn. Wiley-Blackwell, New Jersey, pp 77–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs MH, Vaske JJ, Sijtsma MT (2014) Predictive potential of wildlife value orientations for acceptability of management interventions. J Nat Conserv 22:377–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James G, Witten D, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2013) An introduction to statistical learning. Springer US (Eds), New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Karns GR, Bruskotter JT, Gates RJ (2015) Explaining hunting participation in Ohio: a story of changing land use and new technology. Hum Dimens Wild 20:484–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight RL, Gutzwiller KJ (1995) Wildlife and recreationists. Island Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Komossa F, Van der Zanden EH, Schulp CJ, Verburg PH (2018) Mapping landscape potential for outdoor recreation using different archetypical recreation user groups in the European Union. Ecol Indic 85:105–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuijper DPJ, Oosterveld E, Wymenga E (2009) Decline and potential recovery of the European grey partridge (Perdix perdix) population—a review. Eur J Wildl Res 55:455–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen K (2016) GAM: the predictive modeling silver bullet multithreaded stitch fix, 30

  • Larson LR, Stedman RC, Decker DJ, Siemer WF, Baumer MS (2014) Exploring the social habitat for hunting: toward a comprehensive framework for understanding hunter recruitment and retention. Hum Dimens Wildl 19:105–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg E (2010) Hunter demography, trends and correlates of hunting participation in Sweden. https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/957/1/Lindberg_E_100323.pdf. Accessed 23 November 2017

  • Manfredo MJ (2008) Who cares about wildlife? Springer US (Eds), New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Manfredo MJ, Teel TL, Henry KL (2009) Linking society and environment: a multilevel model of shifting wildlife value orientations in the western United States. Soc Sci Q 90:407–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manfredo MJ, Teel TL, Dietsch AM (2016) Implications of human value shift and persistence for biodiversity conservation. Conserv Biol 30:287–296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manfredo MJ, Teel TL, Sullivan L, Dietsch AM (2017) Values, trust, and cultural backlash in conservation governance: the case of wildlife management in the United States. Biol Conserv 214:303–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massei G, Kindberg J, Licoppe A, Gačić D, Šprem N, Kamler J, Baubet E, Hohmann U, Monaco A, Ozoliņš J, Cellina S, Podgórski T, Fonseca C, Markov N, Pokorny B, Rosell C, Náhlikq A (2015) Wild boar populations up, numbers of hunters down? A review of trends and implications for Europe. Pest Manag Sci 71:492–500

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCance EC, Decker DJ, Colturi AM, Baydack RK, Siemer WF, Curtis PD, Eason T (2017) Importance of urban wildlife management in the United States and Canada. Mammal Study 42:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mensah JT, Elofsson K (2017) An empirical analysis of hunting lease pricing and value of game in Sweden. Land Econ 93:292–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munafò M, Tombolini I (2014) Il consumo di Suolo in Italia. Edizione 2014. Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale. Rapporti 195/2014

  • Pergams OR, Zaradic PA (2008) Evidence for a fundamental and pervasive shift away from nature-based recreation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:2295–2300

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Poudyal NC, Cho SH, Hodges DG (2008) Effects of urban sprawl on hunting participation in the Southeastern United States. South J Appl For 32:134–138

    Google Scholar 

  • QuantumGIS Development Team. (2014). Quantum GIS geographic information system. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project

  • R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing [internet]. Vienna; 2014

  • Raadik J, Cottrell S (2007) Wildlife value orientations: an Estonian case study. Hum Dimens Wildl 12:347–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regione Toscana (2012) Piano agricolo forestale (PRAF).

  • Robison KK, Ridenour D (2012) Whither the love of hunting? Explaining the decline of a major form of rural recreation as a consequence of the rise of virtual entertainment and urbanism. Hum Dimens Wildl 17:418–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith RK, Vaughan Jennings N, Harris S (2005) A quantitative analysis of the abundance and demography of European hares Lepus europaeus in relation to habitat type, intensity of agriculture and climate. Mammal Rev 35:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teel TL, Manfredo MJ, Stinchfield HM (2007) The need and theoretical basis for exploring wildlife value orientations cross-culturally. Hum Dimens Wildl 12:297–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaske JJ, Shelby LB (2008) Crowding as a descriptive indicator and an evaluative standard: results from 30 years of research. Leis Sci 30:111–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vicente MR, López AJ (2011) Assessing the regional digital divide across the European Union-27. Telecommun Policy 35:220–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White EM, Bowker JM, Askew AE, Langner LL, Arnold JR, English DB (2016) Federal outdoor recreation trends: effects on economic opportunities. US Department of Agriculture, Pacific Northwest Research Station

  • Wood SN, Pya N, Säfken B (2016) Smoothing parameter and model selection for general smooth models. J Am Stat Assoc 111:1548–1563

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zaradic PA, Pergams OR, Kareiva P (2009) The impact of nature experience on willingness to support conservation. PLoS One 4:e7367

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are extremely grateful to Dr. Cristina Marullo, who helped in understanding and structuring income data for the study area.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacopo Cerri.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 150 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cerri, J., Ferretti, M. & Coli, L. Where the wild things are: urbanization and income affect hunting participation in Tuscany, at the landscape scale. Eur J Wildl Res 64, 23 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-018-1183-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-018-1183-0

Keywords

Navigation