Abstract
The purpose of this study is to segment residents based on their perception of the risk of brown bear attacks. In addition, in order to design effective risk communication, we investigated the association between residents’ risk perception and their sociodemographic characteristics and beliefs. We conducted a questionnaire survey of residents of Shibetsu Town, Japan. For this survey, questions, developed from several risk perception studies, were used to evaluate the perception of the risk of brown bear attacks. Using a principal component analysis (PCA), we obtained four principal factors: seriousness, avoidability, accountability, and management. Furthermore, a cluster analysis using the PCA factor scores identified three groups of respondents with significantly different risk perceptions. Each group had significantly different sociodemographic characteristics and beliefs. Group 1 respondents had had negative experiences with bears, and therefore considered bear attacks to be high risk. In contrast, group 2 respondents felt less accountable for bear attacks because their lives were less connected to the bears. Finally, group 3 respondents had positive attitudes towards bear conservation. They perceived that, owing to increasing bear populations, bear attacks were unavoidable; however, they did not think the risk was serious. Segmentation based on risk perception can help to reduce potential human–wildlife conflicts and improve wildlife management.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This number was estimated by questionnaire surveys of local hunters.
One US dollar is roughly equivalent to 80 JPY, based on the 2011 exchange rate.
References
Arjunan M, Holmes C, Puyravaud JP, Davidar P (2006) Do developmental initiatives influence local attitudes toward conservation? A case study from the Kalakad–Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve, India. J Environ Manag 79:188–197
Barua M, Bhagwat SA, Jadhav S (2013) The hidden dimensions of human–wildlife conflict: health impacts, opportunity and transaction costs. Biol Conserv 157:309–316
Burger J, Sanchez J, Gibbons JW, Gochfeld M (1998) Gender differences in recreational use, environmental attitudes, and perceptions of future land use at the Savannah River site. Environ Behav 30:472–486
Don Carlos AW, Bright AD, Teel TL, Vaske JJ (2009) Human–black bear conflict in urban areas: an integrated approach to management response. Hum Dimens Wildl 14:174–184
Ericsson G, Heberlein TA (2003) Attitudes of hunters, locals, and the general public in Sweden now that the wolves are back. Biol Conserv 111:149–159
Fischhoff B, Slovic P, Lichtenstein S, Read S, Combs B (1978) How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sci 9:127–152
Flynn J, Burns W, Mertz CK, Slovic P (1992) Trust as a determinant of opposition to a high-level radioactive waste repository: analysis of a structural model. Risk Anal 12:417–429
Glikman JA, Bath AJ, Vaske JJ (2010) Segmenting normative beliefs regarding wolf management in central Italy. Hum Dimens Wildl 15:347–358
Gore ML, Siemer WF, Shanahan JE, Scheufele D, Decker DJ (2005) Effects on risk perception of media coverage of a black bear-related human fatality. Wildl Soc Bull 33:507–516
Gore ML, Knuth BA, Curtis PD, Shanahan JE (2006) Stakeholder perceptions of risk associated with human–black bear conflicts in New York’s Adirondack Park campgrounds: implications for theory and practice. Wildl Soc Bull 34:36–43
Gore ML, Knuth BA, Curtis PD, Shanahan JE (2007) Campground manager and user perceptions of risk associated with negative human–black bear interactions. Hum Dimens Wildl 12:31–43
Gore ML, Knuth BA, Scherer CW, Curtis PD (2008) Evaluating a conservation investment designed to reduce human–wildlife conflict. Conserv Lett 1:136–145
Gore ML, Wilson RS, Siemer WF, Wieczorek Hudenko H, Clarke CE, Sol Hart P, Maguire LA, Muter BA (2009) Application of risk concepts to wildlife management: special issue introduction. Hum Dimens Wildl 14:301–313
Grobe D, Douthitt R, Zepeda L (1999) A model of consumers’ risk perceptions toward recombinant bovine growth hormone (rbGH): the impact of risk characteristics. Risk Anal 19:661–673
Herrero S (2002) Bear attacks: their causes and avoidance. Revised edition. Lyons and Burford, New York
Herrero S, Higgins A, Cardoza JE, Hajduk LI, Smith TS (2011) Fatal attacks by American black bear on people: 1900–2009. J Wildl Manag 75:596–603
Hokkaido Government (2013) Hokkaido brown bear conservation and management plan. http://www.pref.hokkaido.lg.jp/ks/skn/grp/01/higuma/bear_management_plan_beta.pdf. Accessed 20 February 2014
Itoh T, Sato Y, Tsuruga H, Mano T, Kohira M, Yamanaka M, Kasai S, Kobayashi K, Iwata R (2013) Estimating the population structure of brown bears in eastern Hokkaido based on microsatellite analysis. Acta Theriol 58:127–138
Kleiven J, Bjerke T, Kaltenborn B (2004) Factors influencing the social acceptability of large carnivore behaviours. Biodivers Conserv 13:1647–1658
Knight J (2000) Natural enemies: people–wildlife conflicts in anthropological perspective. Routledge, London
Kubo T, Shoji Y, Tsuge T (2011) Understanding visitor perceptions of risk associated with outdoor recreation: a case study of hiking through the brown bear habitat in Daisetsuzan National Park, Japan. J For Econ 57(3):31–40 (In Japanese with English Abstract)
Löe J, Röskaft E (2004) Large carnivores and human safety: a review. Ambio 33(6):283–288
Musiani M, Mamo C, Boitani L, Callaghan C, Gates CC, Mattei L, Visalberghi E, Breck S, Volpi G (2003) Wolf depredation trends and the use of fladry barriers to protect livestock in western North America. Conserv Biol 17:1538–1547
Naughton-Treves L, Treves A (2005) Socio-ecological factors shaping local support for wildlife: crop-raiding by elephants and other wildlife in Africa. In: Woodroffe R, Thirgood S, Rabinowitz A (eds) People and wildlife: conflict or coexistence? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 252–277
Riley SJ, Decker DJ (2000) Risk perception as a factor in wildlife stakeholder acceptance capacity for cougars in Montana. Hum Dimens Wildl 5:50–62
Sato Y, Aoi T, Kaji K, Takatsuki S (2004) Temporal changes in the population density and diet of brown bears in eastern Hokkaido, Japan. Mamm Study 29:47–53
Sato Y, Kobayashi Y, Urata T, Takatsuki S (2008) Home range and habitat use of female brown bear (Ursus arctos) in Urahoro, eastern Hokkaido, Japan. Mamm Study 33:99–109
Siemer WF, Decker DJ (2003) New York state black bear management survey. Human dimensions research unit series 3–6. Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca
Sjoberg L (1998) Worry and risk perception. Risk Anal 18:85–93
Skogen K, Thrane C (2007) Wolves in context: using survey data to situate attitudes within a wider cultural framework. Soc Nat Resour 21:17–33
Slovic P (1987) Perception of risk. Science 236:280–285
Slovic P (1993) Perceived risk, trust, and democracy. Risk Anal 13:675–682
Sponarski CC, Semeniuk C, Glikman JA, Bath AJ, Musiani M (2013) Heterogeneity among rural resident attitudes toward wolves. Hum Dimens Wildl 18:239–248
Teel TL, Manfredo MJ (2010) Understanding the diversity of public interests in wildlife conservation. Conserv Biol 24:128–139
Vaske JJ (2008) Survey research and analysis: applications in parks, recreation and human dimensions. Venture Publishing, State College, PA
Vaske JJ, Needham MD (2007) Segmenting public beliefs about conflict with coyotes in an urban recreation setting. J Park Recreat Adm 25:79–98
Weber O, Scholz RW, Buhlmann R, Grasmuck D (2001) Risk perception of heavy metal soil contamination and attitudes toward decontamination strategies. Risk Anal 21:967–977
Woodroffe R, Thirgood S, Rabinowitz A (2005) People and wildlife: conflict or co-existence? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Yamanaka M (2007) Issues concerning the wildlife observation in Shiretoko National Park: the significance and risk. Nat Parks 656:10–12 (In Japanese)
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows Grant Number 246094. We thank K. Takimoto, H. Suzuki, M. Osada, and Y. Fujimoto in Shibetsu Town, Japan, for their help. We also thank the editors and anonymous reviewers for helpful review of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kubo, T., Shoji, Y. Public segmentation based on the risk perception of brown bear attacks and management preferences. Eur J Wildl Res 62, 203–210 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-016-0994-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-016-0994-0