Skip to main content
Log in

Brief inductions in episodic past or future thinking: effects on episodic detail and problem-solving

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Cognitive Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Episodic specificity inductions, involving brief training in recollecting episodic details, have been shown to improve subsequent performance on tasks involving remembering the past, imagining the future and problem solving. The current study examined if specificity inductions targeting self-referential past or future episodic thinking would have dissociable effects on generating past and future episodic detail and problem solving. Sixty-three participants were randomised to either a past self-referential or future self-referential episodic induction. All participants also completed a control task. Participants randomised to the self-referential future thinking induction generated more episodic details on past and future narrative tasks compared to a control task, whereas participants randomised to a self-referential past thinking induction showed similar performance to the control task. When examining within-group performance of participants randomised to the past or future induction, we found some evidence of dissociable effects of inductions on narrative generation tasks, but not on problem solving outcomes. Our findings suggest that self-referential inductions may be useful for increasing episodic specificity, but that the temporal distance and direction of the induction matters. We discuss our results in the context of the potential clinical utility of this approach for populations vulnerable to autobiographical memory disruption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Funding

The authors have no funding to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DH designed the study with input from DA. SD, MC and AW recruited participants and collected data. AC and DH analysed the data and drafted the study protocol manuscript, and all authors contributed to redrafting.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. J. Hallford.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual adult participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Handling editor: Roy P.C. Kessels (Radboud University) Reviewers: Beth Lloyd (Leiden University) and a second researcher who prefers to remain anonymous.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hallford, D.J., Carmichael, A.M., Austin, D.W. et al. Brief inductions in episodic past or future thinking: effects on episodic detail and problem-solving. Cogn Process 23, 15–25 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-021-01067-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-021-01067-w

Keyword

Navigation