Skip to main content
Log in

Representation of impossible worlds in the cognitive map

  • Short Report
  • Published:
Cognitive Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is often assumed that humans represent large-scale spatial environments as cognitive maps, but the exact features of these representations are still unclear. We investigate the structure of this representation with the impossible worlds paradigm by testing whether the information provided by virtual environments (VEs) with arbitrary violations of geometrical rules is rectified (“distorted”) to become compatible with a map-like structure. The experiments were conducted in virtual reality using a natural locomotion interface. The subjects’ task was to explore possible and impossible VEs carefully to achieve a “full understanding”. After each trial, they had to “blindly” reproduce the path through the environment from memory in a VE with impoverished visual cues. We have found no evidence for angular or configurational distortions or alterations in the blind reproductions of impossible VEs. Blind reproduction indicates that impossible VEs do not require a transformation into a “possible” format to make them fit into the cognitive map. This suggests that the representation may not be similar to a map in a bounded sense of interpretation but requires more generalized concepts for its understanding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  • Chrastil ER, Warren WH (2013) Active and passive spatial learning in human navigation: acquisition of survey knowledge. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 39(5):1520–1537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evans GW (1980) Environmental cognition. Psychol Bull 88:259–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallistel CR (1990) The organization of learning. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hommel B (2009) Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding). Psychol Res PRPF 73(4):512–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montello DR (1998) A new framework for understanding the acquisition of spatial knowledge in large-scale environments. In: Egenhofer MJ, Golledge RG (eds) Spatial and temporal reasoning in geographic information systems. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 143–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore T (1999) Shape representations and visual guidance of saccadic eye movements. Science 285(5435):1914–1917

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Regan JK, Noë A (2001) A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behav Brain Sci 24(05):939–973

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prinz W (1997) Perception and action planning. Eur J Cogn Psychol 9(2):129–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulvermüller F, Fadiga L (2010) Active perception: sensorimotor circuits as a cortical basis for language. Nat Rev Neurosci 11(5):351–360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel AW, White SH (1975) The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. In: Reese HW (ed) Advances in child development and behavior 10. Academic Press, New York, pp 9–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman EC (1948) Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychol Rev 55(4):189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky B (1992) Distortions in cognitive maps. Geoforum 23(2):131–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virtusphere, Inc. (2013) www.virtusphere.com. Accessed 30 April 2015

  • Zetzsche C, Galbraith C, Wolter J, Schill K (2009) Representation of space: image-like or sensorimotor? Spat Vis 22(5):409–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Tim Hantel for modeling the VEs and Jaime Maldonado for the preparation of the data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thorsten Kluss.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kluss, T., Marsh, W.E., Zetzsche, C. et al. Representation of impossible worlds in the cognitive map. Cogn Process 16 (Suppl 1), 271–276 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-015-0705-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-015-0705-x

Keywords

Navigation