Skip to main content
Log in

The Pharmacokinetic Profiles of Pre-Operative Prophylactic Cefepime Application in Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Women Undergoing Surgical Interventions Using a Fully Validated Liquid Chromatographic Method

  • Original
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pregnancy alters pharmacokinetic profile of many drugs, because of altering body volume and metabolism rate. Therefore, dosage rates and concentrations of drugs must be controlled during pregnancy. Here, we identified the pharmacokinetic profile of pre-operatively given cefepime in caesarean section and gynecological operations using a simple, rapid, cost-effective and valid liquid chromatographic method. The chromatographic separation was performed using 40 mM, pH 3.2 phosphate buffer containing 6 % methanol as mobile phase at 0.30 mL min−1 flow rate. Gradient elution with methanol was applied to get shorter analysis time without any interference from plasma endogens. During analyses, temperature of column, autosampler and detector were set as 30, 10 and 40 °C, respectively. The detection wavelength was 260 nm and ceftizoxime was used as internal standard. At the optimum conditions, the cefepime analysis from plasma samples was completed in 7 min. Cefepime was extracted from plasma samples using perchloric acid with a very high recovery rate (99.3 %). The method was fully validated according to the Food and Drug Administration guidelines for bioanalytical method validation, and found to be selective, linear, repeatable, reproducible and robust. After validation studies, the method was applied to five caesarean-sectioned and four non-pregnant sectioned women treated with pre-operative, prophylactic single intravenous dose of cefepime (1 g Maxipime®) in order to determine pharmacokinetic profile of cefepime. Peak serum concentrations of cefepime in caesarean-sectioned women at the arterial port after infusion was 70.11 ± 10.74 μg mL−1. The mean elimination half-life, volume of distribution and calculated area under the concentration–time curve (AUC)0–∞ were 1.10 ± 0.23 h, 14.22 ± 2.29 L and 101.55 ± 10.99 μg h mL−1 for caesarean-sectioned women; and 1.14 ± 0.21 h, 14.76 ± 2.92 L and 104.71 ± 36.34 μg h mL−1 for non-pregnant sectioned women, respectively. The area under curve, elimination half-life, maximum plasma concentration and the mean distribution volume of cefepime were not changed in case of pregnancy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barradell LB, Bryson HM (1994) Drugs 47:471–505

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chapman TM, Perry CM (2003) Am J Respir Med 2:75–107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rybak M (1996) Am J Med 100:39S–44S

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dawes M, Chowienczyk PJ (2001) Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 15:819–826

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nemutlu E, Kir S, Eroglu H, Katlan D, Ozek A, Oyuncu O, Beksac MS (2010) Comb Chem High T Scr 13:502–509

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Morgan D, Smallwood R (1990) Clin Pharmacokinet 18:61

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Popovi J, Gruji Z, Sabo A (2007) J Clin Pharm Ther 32:595–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Philipson A (1979) Clin Pharmacokinet 4:297–309

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Valassis IN, Parissi-Poulou M, Macheras P (1999) J Chromatogr B 721:249–255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Calahorra B, Campanero MA, Sadaba B, Azanza JR (1999) Biomed Chromatogr 13:272–275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Breilh D, Lavallee C, Fratta A, Ducint D, Cony-Makhoul P, Saux MC (1999) J Chromatogr B 734:121–127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cherti N, Kinowski JM, Lefrant JY, Bressolle F (2001) J Chromatogr B 754:377–386

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Breilh D, Saux MC, Delaisement C, Fratta A, Ducint D, Velly JF, Couraud L (2001) Pulm Pharmacol Ther 14:69–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ikawa K, Morikawa N, Hayato S, Ikeda K, Ohge H, Sueda T (2007) Int J Antimicrob Ag 30:270–273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Palacios FJJ, Mochon MC, Sanchez JCJ, Lopez MAB, Perez AG (2005) Chromatographia 62:355–361

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lopez KJV, Bertoluci DF, Vicente KM, Dell’Aquilla AM, Santos SRCJ (2007) J Chromatogr B 860:241–245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Denooz R, Charlier C (2008) J Chromatogr B 864:161–167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Farthing C, Farthing D, Brophy DF, Larus T, Maynor L, Fakhry I, Gehr TWB (2008) Chromatographia 67:365–368

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ozkan Y, Kucukguzel I, Ozkan SA, Aboul-Enein HY (2001) Biomed Chromatogr 15:263–266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nemutlu E, Kir S, Katlan D, Beksac MS (2009) Talanta 80:117–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Verdier MC, Tribut O, Tattevin P, Le Tulzo Y, Michelet C, Bentue-Ferrer D (2011) Antimicrob Agents Ch 55:4873–4879

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ohmori T, Suzuki A, Niwa T, Ushikoshi H, Shirai K, Yoshida S, Ogura S, Itoh Y (2011) J Chromatogr B 879:1038–1042

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Causon R (1997) J Chromatogr B 689:175–180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Little BB (1999) Obstet Gynecol 93:858–868

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Satoskar RS, Bhandarkar SD, Rege NN (2007) Pharmacology and pharmacotherapeutics. Popular prakashan, Mumbai, pp 1091–1101

    Google Scholar 

  26. Azancot-Benisty A, Jacqz-Aigrain E, Guirgis NM, Decrepy A, Oury JF, Blot P (1992) J Pediatr 121:608–613

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Gerdin E, Salmonson T, Lindberg B, Rane A (1990) J Perinat Med 18:479–487

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ayşegül Doğan or Emirhan Nemutlu.

Additional information

Ayşegül Doğan and Emirhan Nemutlu contributed equally to this work.

Published in the topical collection New Developments for the Sensitive and Validated Drug Analysis Using Chromatographic Methods with guest editor Sibel A. Ozkan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Doğan, A., Nemutlu, E., Özek, M.A. et al. The Pharmacokinetic Profiles of Pre-Operative Prophylactic Cefepime Application in Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Women Undergoing Surgical Interventions Using a Fully Validated Liquid Chromatographic Method. Chromatographia 76, 1513–1519 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-013-2415-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-013-2415-9

Keywords

Navigation