Skip to main content
Log in

A high-accuracy, time-saving method for extracting nest watch data from video recordings

  • Technical Notes
  • Published:
Journal of Ornithology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding inter- and intraspecific variation in parental care has been an important focus in studies of avian behaviour and evolution. Unfortunately, typical methods for quantifying parental care, such as field observation and video recordings, can be extremely time-consuming. Here, we demonstrate that utilizing behavioural analysis software, such as EthoVision XT, can reduce time required for video data extraction by 37−69 %. This method is highly accurate; results and error rates did not differ from those of manual observation. We suggest this method could be beneficial and time-saving for studies analyzing large amounts of video recordings.

Zusammenfassung

Eine sehr genaue und zeitsparende Methode zur Extraktion von Nestbeobachtungsdaten aus Videoaufnahmen

Das Verständnis inter- und intraspezifischer Variation der elterlichen Brutpflege ist ein wichtiger Schwerpunkt bei der Erforschung des Verhaltens und der Evolution von Vögeln. Leider können die üblichen Methoden zur Quantifizierung elterlicher Fürsorge, beispielsweise Feldbeobachtungen und Videoaufzeichnungen, äußerst zeitaufwendig sein. Hier zeigen wir, dass der Einsatz von Verhaltensanalyse-Software, wie zum Beispiel EthoVision XT, die für die Extraktion der Videodaten notwendige Zeit um 37–69 % verringern kann. Diese Methode ist sehr genau; die Ergebnisse und Fehlerraten unterschieden sich nicht von denen bei manueller Auswertung. Wir sind der Ansicht, dass sich diese Methode bei Untersuchungen, welche die Analyse größer Mengen Videomaterials beinhalten, als vorteilhaft und zeitsparend erweisen könnte.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Bechstein P, Rehbach N-J, Yuhasingham G et al (2014) The clock gene period1 regulates innate routine behaviour in mice. Proc Biol Sci 281:20140034

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cox WA, Pruett, Benson TJ et al (2012) Development of camera technology for monitoring nests. surveillance of nesting birds, 1st edn. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 185–198

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB (1986) Reproductive success of dunnocks, prunella modularis, in a variable mating system. I. Factors influencing provisioning rate, nestling weight and fledging success. J Anim Ecol 55:123–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feenders G, Bateson M (2013) Hand rearing affects emotional responses but not basic cognitive performance in European starlings. Anim Behav 86:127–138

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fonio E, Benjamini Y, Golani I (2009) Freedom of movement and the stability of its unfolding in free exploration of mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:21335–21340

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Germain RR, Reudink MW, Marra PP, Ratcliffe LM (2010) Carotenoid-based male plumage predicts parental investment in the american redstart. Wilson J Ornithol 122:318–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghalambor CK, Peluc SI, Martin TE (2013) Plasticity of parental care under the risk of predation: how much should parents reduce care? Biol Lett 9:20130154

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gladbach A, Braun C, Nordt A et al (2009) Chick provisioning and nest attendance of male and female Wilson’s storm petrels Oceanites oceanicus. Polar Biol 32:1315–1321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison A, Flood NJ, Reudink MW (2014) Reproductive correlates of plumage coloration of female Mountain bluebirds. J Field Ornithol 85:168–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noldus LP, Spink AJ, Tegelenbosch RA (2001) EthoVision: a versatile video tracking system for automation of behavioral experiments. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput J Psychon Soc Inc 33:398–414

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Osmond MM, Reudink MW, Germain RR et al (2013) Relationships between carotenoid-based female plumage and age, reproduction, and mate colour in the American redstart (Setophaga ruticilla). Can J Zool 91:589–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson WD, Hau M, Klasing KC et al (2010) Diversification of life histories in new world birds. Auk 127:253–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwagmeyer PL, Mock DW (2008) Parental provisioning and offspring fitness: size matters. Anim Behav 75:291–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen S-F, Chen H-C, Vehrencamp SL, Yuan H-W (2010) Group provisioning limits sharing conflict among nestlings in joint-nesting Taiwan yuhinas. Biol Lett 6:318–321

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons R (1986) Food provisioning, nestling growth and experimental manipulation of brood size in the African Redbreasted sparrowhawk Accipiter rufiventris. Ornis Scand 17:31–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan JP (1988) Effects of provisioning rates and number fledged on nestling aggression in Great blue herons. Colon Waterbirds 11:220–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Węgrzyn E (2013) Intensity of mouth coloration in Blackcap Sylvia atricapilla nestlings affects food distribution among siblings but not provisioning of the whole brood. Ibis 155:156–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood JN (2013) Newborn chickens generate invariant object representations at the onset of visual object experience. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:14000–14005

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wright J, Both C, Cotton P, Bryant D (1998) Quality vs. quantity: energetic and nutritional trade-offs in parental provisioning strategies. J Anim Ecol 67:620–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank G. Dreger, P. and J. Gray, and the members of the Kamloops Naturalists Club for use of their bluebird routes. We thank C. Miller for the use of EthoVision software, J. Mumford for his technical advice regarding EthoVision, and D. Eye for volunteering to watch nest watch videos. Funding for this project was provided by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Discovery Grant (MWR), the Canada-British Columbia Ranching Task Force Funding Initiative as administered by the Investment Agriculture Foundation of British Columbia (JSC), and a CUEF U-REAP undergraduate research award (DRE).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew W. Reudink.

Additional information

Communicated by F. Bairlein.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the Electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 4345 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (PDF 97 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Evans, D.R., McArthur, S.L., Bailey, J.M. et al. A high-accuracy, time-saving method for extracting nest watch data from video recordings. J Ornithol 156, 1125–1129 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-015-1267-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-015-1267-5

Keywords

Navigation