Skip to main content
Log in

“Bug-eggs” for Common Swifts and other small birds: minimally-invasive and stress-free blood sampling during incubation

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Journal of Ornithology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of haematophagous bugs (Triatominae) for minimally-invasive blood sampling has increasingly gained interest. We developed a small bug-containing dummy egg (size: 25 × 19 [mm]) for stress-free blood sampling during incubation in Common Swifts (Apus apus) and potentially even smaller bird species. Our design expands on an application of a method previously used successfully on larger birds. In our study, 40 % of blood-sampling attempts were successful. Success was highest in the early breeding season, higher at noon than later in the day and unaffected by nest infestation with ectoparasitic louse-flies (Crataerina pallida). We recommend this method for blood-sampling birds without trapping during the sensitive period of incubation and encourage its application in small bird species.

Zusammenfassung

„Wanzen-Eier” für Mauersegler und andere kleine Vögel – minimal-invasive und stressfreie Blutentnahme während der Inkubationszeit

Der Einsatz blutsaugender Wanzen (Triatominae) zur minimal-invasiven Blutprobengewinnung hat zunehmend an Interesse in der Forschung gewonnen. Zur stressfreien Blutentnahme während der Inkubationszeit entwickelten wir für Mauersegler (Apus apus) – und potentiell noch kleinere Vogelarten – ein kleines künstliches Ei (25 x 19 [mm]), in das eine Wanze gesetzt wird. Unser „Wanzen-Ei“-Design erweitert die Anwendung einer Methode, die bei größeren Vogelarten bereits erfolgreich war. In unserer Studie lag die Erfolgsquote der Blutentnahme bei 40 %. Sie war vor allem zu Beginn der Brutsaison hoch, war in den Mittagsstunden höher als in den Stunden danach und war unabhängig vom Befall des Nestes mit Lausfliegen (Crataerina pallida). Wir empfehlen diese Methode zur stressfreien Blutentnahme bei Vögeln ohne deren Fang während der empfindlichen Zeit der Inkubation - auch bei kleineren Vogelarten.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  • Arnold JM, Oswald SA, Voigt CC, Palme R, Braasch A, Bauch C, Becker PH (2008) Taking the stress out of blood collection: comparison of field blood-sampling techniques for analysis of baseline corticosterone. J Avian Biol 39:588–592. doi:10.1111/j.0908-8857.2008.04265.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bähnisch E (2011) Parasitierung, Stress und Fremdgehen bei Kohlmeisen (Parus major) in unterschiedlichen Habitaten. Dissertation, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany

  • Bauch C, Kreutzer S, Becker PH (2010) Breeding experience affects condition: blood metabolite levels over the course of incubation in a seabird. J Comp Physiol B 180:835–845. doi:10.1007/s00360-010-0453-2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bauch C, Becker PH, Verhulst S (2013) Telomere length reflects phenotypic quality and costs of reproduction in a long-lived seabird. Proc R Soc B 280:20122540. doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.2540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Becker PH, Ludwigs J-D (2004) Sterna hirundo Common Tern. In: BWP update, vol 6. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 91–137

  • Becker PH, Voigt CC, Arnold JM, Nagel R (2006) A non-invasive technique to bleed incubating birds without trapping: a blood-sucking bug in a hollow egg. J Ornithol 147:115–118. doi:10.1007/s10336-005-0027-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler PJ, Green JA, Boyd IL, Speakman JR (2004) Measuring metabolic rate in the field: the pros and cons of the doubly labelled water and heart rate methods. Funct Ecol 18:168–183. doi:10.111/j.0269-8463.2004.00821.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fair JM, Paul E, Jones J (eds) (2010) Guidelines to the use of wild birds in research, 3rd edn. Ornithological Council, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Glutz von Blotzheim UN (ed) (1980) Apus apus. In: Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas, Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Wiesbaden, 9:671–712

  • Markvardsen SN, Kjelgaard-Hansen M, Ritz C, Sørensen DB (2012) Less invasive blood sampling in the animal laboratory: clinical chemistry and haematology of blood obtained by the Triatominae bug Dipetalogaster maximus. Lab Anim 46:136–141. doi:10.1258/la.2011.011063

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Riechert J, Chastel O, Becker PH (2012) Why do experienced birds reproduce better? Possible endocrine mechanisms in a long-lived seabird, the common tern. Gen Comp Endocrinol 178:391–399. doi:10.1016/j.ygcen.2012.06.022

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Romero LM, Reed JM (2005) Collecting baseline corticosterone samples in the field: is under 3 min good enough? Comp Biochem Physiol A 140:73–79. doi:10.1016/j.cbpb.2004.11.004

    Google Scholar 

  • Stadler A, Meiser CK, Schaub GA (2011) „Living syringes”: use of hematophagous bugs as blood samplers from small and wild animals. In: Mehlhorn H (ed) Parasitology research monographs 1. Springer, Berlin, pp 243–271. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-19382-8_11

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhulst S, Nilsson J-Å (2008) The timing of birds’ breeding seasons: a review of experiments that manipulated timing of breeding. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 363:399–410. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voigt CC, von Helversen O, Michener RH, Kunz TH (2003) Validation of a non-invasive blood-sampling technique for doubly-labelled water experiments. J Exp Zool 296A:87–97. doi:10.1002/jez.a.10121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voigt CC, Faßbender M, Dehnhard M, Wibbelt G, Jewgenow K, Hofer H, Schaub GA (2004) Validation of a minimally invasive blood-sampling technique for the analysis of hormones in domestic rabbits, Oryctolagus cuniculus (Lagomorpha). Gen Comp Endocrinol 135:100–107. doi:10.1016/j.ygcen.2003.08.005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Voigt CC, Peschel U, Wibbelt G, Frölich K (2006) An alternative, less invasive blood sample collection technique for serologic studies utilizing Triatomine bugs (Heteroptera; Insecta). J Wildl Dis 42:466–469

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • von Helversen O, Volleth M, Núñez J (1986) A new method for obtaining blood from a small mammal without injuring the animal: use of Triatomid bugs. Experientia 42:809–810. doi:10.1007/BF01941531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vos AC, Müller T, Neubert L, Voigt CC (2010) Validation of a less invasive blood sampling technique in rabies serology using Reduviid bugs (Triatominae, Hemiptera). J Zoo Wildl Med 41:63–68. doi:10.1638/2009-0103.1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wellbrock AHJ, Bauch C, Rozman J, Witte K (2012) Buccal swabs as a reliable source of DNA for sexing young and adult Common Swifts (Apus apus). J Ornithol 153:991–994. doi:10.1007/s10336-012-0843-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank: Dieter Gaumann and Bernd Meyer (University of Siegen) for preparing the “bug-eggs”, Wolfgang Hoffmann (Straßen Nordrhein-Westfalen) for permission to work in the bridge, Klaus-Michael Exo (IfV Wilhelmshaven) for providing temperature loggers. Peter H. Becker (IfV Wilhelmshaven) and two anonymous referees for helpful comments on the manuscript. Field studies were done under licence from Landesamt für Natur-, Umwelt- und Verbraucherschutz Nordrhein-Westfalen (9.93.2.10.41.07.095). Ethologische Gesellschaft e.V. (Marburg/Lahn) and University of Siegen provided financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christina Bauch.

Additional information

Communicated by L. Fusani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bauch, C., Wellbrock, A.H.J., Nagel, R. et al. “Bug-eggs” for Common Swifts and other small birds: minimally-invasive and stress-free blood sampling during incubation. J Ornithol 154, 581–585 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-013-0931-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-013-0931-x

Keywords

Navigation