Abstract
There has been a growing global interest in urban agriculture that contributes to the well-being of urban dwellers by providing various ecosystem services. Focusing on allotment gardens, this study quantitatively analyzed their economic conditions, ecosystem service provisions, economic and environmental efficiencies, and the differences among them as regards their location and management. A questionnaire survey was used for data collection as a basic input for the quantification of economic conditions and ecosystem services of 223 allotments in Saitama Prefecture, Japan. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) was used for analyzing the economic and environmental efficiency of each allotment. Statistical analyses were conducted to explore statistically significant differences in economic conditions, ecosystem service provisions, and economic and environmental efficiencies among the four groups of allotment gardens classified by location (i.e., urbanization promotion area [UPA] and urbanization control area [UCA]) and type of actor (i.e., public or private). Our analysis identified that the expenditures of public allotments tended to be significantly larger than those of private allotments, whereas there was no difference in the income among the four groups, which resulted in lower economic efficiency of public allotments. Moreover, although public allotments in UCA and UPA provided a large amount of food production, recreation, and disaster prevention services, DEA revealed that they were less environmentally efficient when expenditures such as land rent, construction cost, and operational cost were considered. Our findings also identified that public allotments provided a significantly large amount of ecosystem services for urban dwellers in exchange of large public expenditures, which often resulted in inefficient allotment operation. If local governments and private actors build a collaborative relationship and strategically divide their roles, the governments could decrease the financial burden in the establishment and operations of allotments while maintaining/increasing benefits arising from allotment gardens.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott M, Doucouliagos C (2003) The efficiency of Australian universities: a data envelopment analysis. Econ Educ Rev 22:89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(01)00068-1
Adler N, Friedman L, Sinuany-Stern Z (2002) Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context. Eur J Oper Res 140:249–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00068-1
Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manag Sci 30:1078–1092. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2:429–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
Clucas B, Parker ID, Feldpausch-Parker AM (2018) A systematic review of the relationship between urban agriculture and biodiversity. Urban Ecosyst 21:635–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-018-0748-8
Elhami B, Akram A, Khanali M (2016) Optimization of energy consumption and environmental impacts of chickpea production using data envelopment analysis (DEA) and multi objective genetic algorithm (MOGA) approaches. Inf Process Agric 3:190–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INPA.2016.07.002
Farrell MJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J R Stat Soc Ser A 120:253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2343100
Fei R, Lin B (2017) The integrated efficiency of inputs–outputs and energy—CO2 emissions performance of China’s agricultural sector. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 75:668–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2016.11.040
Genter C, Roberts A, Richardson J, Sheaff M (2015) The contribution of allotment gardening to health and wellbeing: a systematic review of the literature. Br J Occup Ther 78:593–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308022615599408
Gómez-Limón JA, Picazo-Tadeo AJ, Reig-Martínez E (2012) Eco-efficiency assessment of olive farms in Andalusia. Land Use Policy 29:395–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2011.08.004
Guitart D, Pickering C, Byrne J (2012) Past results and future directions in urban community gardens research. Urban For Urban Green 11:364–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.UFUG.2012.06.007
Haines-Young R, Potschin M (2018) Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) V5.1 Guidance on the application of the revised structure
Hebbert M (1994) Sen-biki amidst desakota: urban sprawl and urban planning in Japan. In: Shapira P, Masser I, Edgington DW (eds) Planning for cities and regions in Japan, 1st edn. Liverpool University Press, Liverpool, pp 70–91
Hein L, van Koppen K, de Groot RS, van Ierland EC (2006) Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 57:209–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2005.04.005
Higuchi M (1999) Analysis of the Present Condition of an Allotment Garden in Japan (in Japanese). Jpn J Hum Geogr 51:291–304. https://doi.org/10.4200/jjhg1948.51.291
Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (2016) The methodological assessment report on scenarios and models of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Bonn
Japan International Cooperation Agency (2007) Urban land use planning system in Japan, 2nd edn. Japan International Cooperation Agency, Tokyo
Kono M, Fujita N (2014) Characteristics and user demands of urban farms: a case study on the “Machinaka Saien” in-town farm. J Jpn Inst Landsc Archit 77:433–436. https://doi.org/10.5632/jila.77.433
Li T, Baležentis T, Makutėnienė D et al (2016) Energy-related CO2 emission in European Union agriculture: driving forces and possibilities for reduction. Appl Energy 180:682–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APENERGY.2016.08.031
Lin BB, Philpott SM, Jha S (2015) The future of urban agriculture and biodiversity-ecosystem services: challenges and next steps. Basic Appl Ecol 16:189–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BAAE.2015.01.005
Mardani A, Zavadskas EK, Streimikiene D et al (2017) A comprehensive review of data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach in energy efficiency. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 70:1298–1322. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2016.12.030
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (2014) Summary of urban agriculture promotion basic act (in Japanese)
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (2017) Efforts of disaster prevention cooperative farmland in the three major metropolitan areas. http://www.maff.go.jp/j/nousin/kouryu/tosi_nougyo/attach/pdf/index-2.pdf. Accessed 25 Jul 2018 (in Japanese)
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (2018) Situation surrounding allotment gardens. http://www.maff.go.jp/j/nousin/nougyou/simin_noen/zyokyo.html. Accessed 20 Jul 2018
Mitarai Y, Matsushima K (2017) Classification of allotment gardeners in urban area: case study of Atsugi City. Pap Environ Inf Sci 31:237–240. https://doi.org/10.11492/CEISPAPERS.CEIS31.0_237
Mougeot LJA (2005) Agropolis : the social, political, and environmental dimensions of urban agriculture. Earthscan
Oba R, Obase R (2001) A study on the allotment gardens in tokyo area and the financial situation of landowners (in Japanese). J City Plan Inst Japan 36:283–288. https://doi.org/10.11361/journalcpij.36.283
Osaka Prefectural Government (2006) Disaster-resistant urban development guidelines. http://www.pref.osaka.lg.jp/sokei/bousaiguideline/index.html. Accessed 25 Jul 2018
Perez-Vazquez A, Anderson S, Wiltshire R, Fraser R (2010) Valuing non-market benefits derived from allotments in southeast England: a contingent valuation study valuing non-market benefits derived from allotments in southeast England: a contingent valuation study. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 13:103–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504500609469665org/10.1080/13504500609469665
Saitama Prefectural Government (2017) About the establishment of citizen farm. https://www.pref.saitama.lg.jp/a0902/shiminnouen-kaisetsu.html. Accessed 26 Jul 2018
Seiford LM, Thrall RM (1990) Recent developments in DEA: the mathematical programming approach to frontier analysis. J Econom 46:7–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(90)90045-U
Speak AF, Mizgajski A, Borysiak J (2015) Allotment gardens and parks: provision of ecosystem services with an emphasis on biodiversity. Urban For Urban Green 14:772–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.UFUG.2015.07.007
Susaeta A, Adams DC, Carter DR, Dwivedi P (2016) Climate change and ecosystem services output efficiency in southern loblolly pine forests. Environ Manage 58:417–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-016-0717-z
Tahara S, Yokohari M, Kurita H, Terada T (2011) A quantitative assessment of agricultural production from allotment gardens (in Japanese). J Jpn Inst Landsc Archit 74:685–688. https://doi.org/10.5632/jila.74.685
Tzoulas K, James P (2010) Peoples’ use of, and concerns about, green space networks: a case study of Birchwood, Warrington New Town, UK. Urban For Urban Green 9:121–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.UFUG.2009.12.001
UNDESA (2018) World Urbanization Prospects—Population Division—United Nations. https://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/. Accessed 20 Jul 2018
Ushirozawa S, Makiyama M, Takahashi T (2010) Cost-benefit analysys of Kleingartens in Japan (in Japanese). J Rural Plan Assoc 29:293–298. https://doi.org/10.2750/arp.29.293
van den Berg AE, van Winsum-Westra M, de Vries S, van Dillen SM (2010) Allotment gardening and health: a comparative survey among allotment gardeners and their neighbors without an allotment. Environ Heal 9:74. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-9-74
Vlontzos G, Pardalos PM (2017) Assess and prognosticate green house gas emissions from agricultural production of EU countries, by implementing, DEA Window analysis and artificial neural networks. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 76:155–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2017.03.054
Vlontzos G, Niavis S, Manos B (2014) A DEA approach for estimating the agricultural energy and environmental efficiency of EU countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 40:91–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2014.07.153
Wilhelm JA, Smith RG (2017) Ecosystem services and land sparing potential of urban and peri-urban agriculture: a review. Renew Agric Food Syst 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1742170517000205
Yagi H (2013) Site location and demand for the farm experience business in urban areas. J Rural Plan Assoc 32:323–328. https://doi.org/10.2750/arp.32.323
Yuzawa A (2012) A study on user characteristics and effect of allotment garden. J Archit Plan (Trans AIJ) 77:1095–1102. https://doi.org/10.3130/aija.77.1095
Zadmirzaei M, Mohammadi Limaei S, Olsson L, Amirteimoori A (2017) Assessing the impact of the external non-discretionary factor on the performance of forest management units using DEA approach. J For Res 22:144–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/13416979.2017.1317227
Zhou P, Ang BW, Poh KL (2008) A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies. Eur J Oper Res 189:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJOR.2007.04.042
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (S-15 Predicting and Assessing Natural Capital and Ecosystem Services (PANCES)) of the Ministry of the Environment, Japan, JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 17KT0076, and “Research and Social Implementation of Ecosystem-based Disaster Risk Reduction as Climate Change Adaptation in Shrinking Societies” of the Research Institute for Humanity and Nature, Japan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hashimoto, S., Sato, Y. & Morimoto, H. Public–private collaboration in allotment garden operation has the potential to provide ecosystem services to urban dwellers more efficiently. Paddy Water Environ 17, 391–401 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-019-00734-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-019-00734-1