Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of Breast Density on Computer-Aided Detection in Full-Field Digital Mammography

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The goal of this study was to evaluate the performance of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system in full-field digital mammography (Senographe 2000D, General Electric, Buc, France) in finding out carcinomas depending on the parenchymal density. A total of 226 mediolateral oblique (MLO) and 186 craniocaudal (CC) mammographic views of histologically proven cancers were retrospectively evaluated with a digital CAD system (ImageChecker V2.3 R2 Technology, Los Altos, CA, USA). Malignant tumors were detected correctly by CAD in MLO view in 84.85% in breasts with parenchymal tissue density of the American College of Radiology (ACR) type 1, in 70.33% of the ACR type 2, in 68.12% of the ACR type 3, and in 69.70% of the ACR type 4. For the CC view, similar results were found according to the ACR types. Using the chi-square and McNemar tests, there was no statistical significance. However, a trend of better detection could be seen with decreasing ACR type. In conclusion, there seems to be a tendency for breast tissue density to affect the detection rate of breast cancer when using the CAD system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig 1
Fig 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M Moskowitz (1983) ArticleTitleScreening for breast cancer: how effective are our test? A critical review CA Cancer J Clin 33 26–39 Occurrence Handle6401574 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL3s7gt1CrsA%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. J Rennie R Rusting (1996) ArticleTitleMaking headway against cancer Sci Am 3 56–59 Occurrence Handle10.1038/scientificamerican0996-56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. RE Bird (1990) ArticleTitleProfessional quality assurance for mammography screening programs Radiology 77 8–10

    Google Scholar 

  4. HP Chan K Doi CJ Vyborny RA Schmidt CE Metz KL Lam T Ogura YZ Wu H MacMahon (1990) ArticleTitleImprovement in radiologists' detection of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms. The potential of computer-aided diagnosis Invest Radiol 25 1102–1110 Occurrence Handle2079409 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3M7nslKrsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1097/00004424-199010000-00006

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. B Zheng YH Chang M Staiger W Good D Gur (1995) ArticleTitleComputer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications in digitized mammograms Acad Radiol 2 655–662 Occurrence Handle9419620 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FotVyqsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1076-6332(05)80431-3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. HP Chan B Sahiner MA Helvie N Petrick MA Roubidoux TE Wilson DD Adler C Paramagul JS Newman S Sanjay-Gopal (1999) ArticleTitleImprovement of radiologists' characterization of mammographic masses by using computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study Radiology 212 817–827 Occurrence Handle10478252 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MvgslKqsg%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. EL Thurfjell KA Lernevall AA Taube (1994) ArticleTitleBenefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program Radiology 191 241–244 Occurrence Handle8134580 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2c7otFOrtw%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. A Malich C Marx M Facius T Boehm M Fleck WA Kaiser (2001) ArticleTitleTumour detection rate of a new commercially available computer-aided detection system Eur Radiol 11 2454–2459 Occurrence Handle11734939 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnovVaitw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/s003300101079

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. CJ Vyborny (1994) ArticleTitleCan computers help radiologists read mammograms? Radiology 191 315–317 Occurrence Handle8153298 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2c3gsVWqtA%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. K Doi H MacMahon S Katsuragawa RM Nishikawa Y Jiang (1999) ArticleTitleComputer-aided diagnosis in radiology: potential and pitfalls Eur Radiol 31 97–109 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FivFaguw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0720-048X(99)00016-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. M Funovics S Schamp TH Helbich B Lackner P Wunderbaldinger M Fuchsjäger G Lechner G Wolf (2001) ArticleTitleEvaluation of a computer-assisted diagnosis system in breast carcinoma Röfo Fortschr Geb Röntgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 173 218–223 Occurrence Handle11293863 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3ivV2lsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1055/s-2001-11608

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. S Muller (1999) ArticleTitleFull field digital mammography designed as a complete system Eur Radiol 31 25–34 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MvgsVOntw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0720-048X(99)00066-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. U Bick (2000) ArticleTitleFull-field digital mammography Röfo Fortschr Geb Röntgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 173 957–964 Occurrence Handle10.1055/s-2000-9210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. S Obenauer S Luftner-Nagel D Heyden Particlevon U Munzel F Baum E Grabbe (2002) ArticleTitleScreen-film vs full-field digital mammography: image quality, detectability and characterization of lesions Eur Radiol 12 1697–1702 Occurrence Handle12111060 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38zms1Ghuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00330-001-1269-y

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. F Baum U Fischer S Obenauer E Grabbe (2002) ArticleTitleComputer-aided detection in direct digital full-field mammography: initial results Eur Radiol 12 3015–3017 Occurrence Handle12439584 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38nnvVWrsw%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. S Satija RH Moore JS Michalson et al. (2000) ArticleTitleBreast tissue patterns as a risk factor for developing cancer (abstract) Radiology 217 446

    Google Scholar 

  17. InstitutionalAuthorNameAmerican College of Radiology (ACR) (1998) Illustrated breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) EditionNumber3 American College of Radiology Reston, VA

    Google Scholar 

  18. MT Mandelson N Oestreicher PL Porter D White CA Finder SH Taplin E White (2000) ArticleTitleBreast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers J Natl Cancer Inst 92 1081–1087 Occurrence Handle10880551 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvivFyrtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1093/jnci/92.13.1081

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. LJ Warren Burhenne SA Wood CJ D'Orsi SA Feig DB Kopans KF O'Shaughnessy EA Sickles L Tabar CJ Vyborny RA Castellino (2000) ArticleTitlePotential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography Radiology 215 554–562 Occurrence Handle10796939 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3lslSjtw%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. RF Brem J Baum M Lechner S Kaplan S Souders LG Naul J Hoffmeister (2003) ArticleTitleImprovement in sensitivity of screening mammography with computer-aided detection: a multiinstitutional trial Am J Roentgenol 181 687–693

    Google Scholar 

  21. JA Baker EL Rosen JY Lo EI Gimenez R Walsh MS Soo (2003) ArticleTitleComputer-aided detection (CAD) in screening mammography: sensitivity of commercial CAD systems for detecting architectural distortion Am J Roentgenol 181 1083–1088

    Google Scholar 

  22. WT Ho PW Lam (2003) ArticleTitleClinical performance of computer-assisted detection (CAD) system in detecting carcinoma in breasts of different densities Clin Radiol 58 133–136 Occurrence Handle12623042 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s7htVCmsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1053/crad.2002.1131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. RL Birdwell DM Ikeda KF O'Shaugnessy EA Sickles (2001) ArticleTitleMammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection Radiology 219 192–202 Occurrence Handle11274556 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7oslKgsQ%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. RF Brem JW Hoffmeister JA Rapelyea G Zisman K Mohtashemi G Jindal MP Disimio SK Rogers (2005) ArticleTitleImpact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer Am J Roentgenol 184 439–444

    Google Scholar 

  25. A Malich DR Fischer M Facius A Petrovich J Boettcher C Marx A Hansch WA Kaiser (2005) ArticleTitleEffect of breast density on computer aided detection J Digit Imaging 18 227–233 Occurrence Handle15827823 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10278-004-1047-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silvia Obenauer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Obenauer, S., Sohns, C., Werner, C. et al. Impact of Breast Density on Computer-Aided Detection in Full-Field Digital Mammography. J Digit Imaging 19, 258–263 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-006-0592-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-006-0592-x

Key Words

Navigation