Skip to main content
Log in

The treatment adherence of paraprofessional behavior training programs: a systematic literature review

  • Published:
European Journal of Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 03 December 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

The professionalization of paraprofessionals through training is elemental in providing supports to students with disabilities. Through a systematic review of experimental studies (n = 18), we sought to explore the mechanisms of paraprofessional training programs, and the fidelity of implementation of those programs. For inclusion, studies were required to report paraprofessional and student outcomes related to interventions aimed at the improvement of challenging student behaviors. This review was conducted within the ProQuest database using ERIC and PsychInfo. Findings indicate that when trained, paraprofessionals successfully implement communication-based interventions as the primary means for reducing challenging student behavior. However, training program adherence is seldom reported in replicable detail. Furthermore, paraprofessional training is mostly delivered by a researcher and conducted in a one-on-one setting, using multiple training methods such as didactic instruction and coaching with feedback. Unfortunately, these training models are hardly feasible or replicable within authentic school settings. As such, researchers are called to report training treatment adherence with more clarity and detail so that we may begin the work of teaching pre-service educators these effective training methods. This study did not include training programs that provided academic interventions and thus is limited in scope.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  • Alvarez, H. K. (2007). The impact of teacher preparation on responses to student aggression in the classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(7), 1113–1126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andzik, N. R. (2017). An examination of practitioners’ implementation of communication intervention with students with complex communication needs (Publication No. ED579271) [Doctoral Dissertation, The Ohio State University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global

  • Andzik, N., & Cannella-Malone, H. I. (2017). A review of the pyramidal training approach for practitioners working with individuals with disabilities. Behavior Modification, 41(4), 558–580. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445517692952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Applequist, K. L. (2009). Parent perspectives of special education: Framing of experiences for prospective special educators. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 28(2), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/875687050902800202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, M. E., Tornblad, M. K., & Jones, K. S. (2020). The accuracy of interrater reliability estimates found using a subset of the total data sample: A bootstrap analysis. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 64(1), 1377–1382. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181320641329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barresi, D. (1993). Training special education teachers and paraprofessionals of developmentally disabled and behaviorally disordered children and youth in applied behavior analysis (Publication No. ED365043) [Doctoral dissertation, Nova University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global

  • Bessette, K. K., & Wills, H. P. (2007). An example of an elementary school paraprofessional-implemented functional analysis and intervention. Behavioral Disorders, 32(3), 192–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874290703200304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, E. E., Gilson, C. B., & Carter, E. W. (2016). Accomplishing more together: Influences to the quality of professional relationships between special educators and paraprofessionals. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 41(4), 256–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796916665604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bingham, M. A., Spooner, F., & Browder, D. (2007). Training paraeducators to promote the use of augmentative and alternative communication by students with significant disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 42(3), 339–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, M. E., & Carter, E. W. (2016). Efficacy of teachers training paraprofessionals to implement peer support arrangements. Exceptional Children, 82(3), 354–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915585564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock, M. E., Biggs, E. E., Carter, E. W., Cattey, G. N., & Raley, K. S. (2016). Implementation and generalization of peer support arrangements for students with severe disabilities in inclusive classrooms. Journal of Special Education, 49(4), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466915594368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock, M. E., Cannella-Malone, H. I., Seaman, R. L., Andzik, N. R., Schaefer, J. M., Page, E. J., … Dueker, S. A. (2017a). Findings across practitioner training studies in special education: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Exceptional Children. 84(1):7–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402917698008

  • Brock, M. E., Seaman, R. L., & Downing, C. (2017b). Promoting learning for a student with a severe disability through paraprofessional training. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 42(4), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796917729682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broer, S. M., Doyle, M. B., & Giangreco, M. F. (2005). Perspectives of students with intellectual disabilities about their experiences with paraprofessional support. Exceptional Children, 71(4), 415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronstein, B., Breeden, N., Glover, T. A., & Reddy, L. A. (2021). Paraprofessionals’ perceptions of behavior problems in elementary school classrooms. The Journal of Special Education, 55(3), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466920961085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. S., & Stanton-Chapman, T. L. (2017). Experiences of paraprofessionals in US preschool special education and general education classrooms. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 17(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L., Farrington, K., Knight, T., Ross, C., & Ziegler, M. (1999). Fewer paraprofessionals and more teachers and therapists in educational programs for students with significant disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 24(4), 250–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Labor Statistics (n.d.) U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Outlook Handbook, Teacher Assistants at https://www.bls.gov/ooh/education-training-and-library/teacher-assistants.htm

  • Carter, E., Rourke, L. O., Sisco, L. G., & Pelsue, D. (2009). Knowledge, responsibilities, and training needs of paraprofessionals in elementary and secondary schools. Remedial and Special Education, 30(6), 344–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, E. W., Asmus, J., Moss, C. K., Biggs, E. E., Bolt, D. M., Born, T. L., … Weir, K. (2016). Randomized evaluation of peer support arrangements to support the inclusion of high school students with severe disabilities. Exceptional Children. 82(2):209–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915598780

  • Causton-Theoharis, J. N., & Malmgren, K. W. (2005). Increasing peer interactions for students with behavioral disorders via paraprofessional training. Exceptional Children, 71(4), 431–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra, R. V., Sandoval-Lucero, E., & French, N. (2011). Effective supervision of paraeducators: Multiple benefits and outcomes. National Teacher Education Journal, 4(2), 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Common, E. A., Lane, K. L., Pustejovsky, J. E., Johnson, A. H., & Johl, L. E. (2017). Functional assessment – based interventions for Students with or at-risk for high-incidence disabilities: Field testing single-case synthesis methods. Remedial and Special Education, 38(6), 331–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517693320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conroy, M. A., Alter, P. J., Boyd, B. A., & Bettini, E. (2014). Teacher preparation for students who demonstrate challenging behaviors. In P. T. Sindelar, E. D. McCray, M. T. Brownell, & B. Lignugaris-Kraft (Eds.), Handbook of research on special education teacher preparation (pp. 129–142). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, B. G., Buysse, V., Klingner, J., Landrum, T. J., McWilliam, R. A., Tankersley, M., & Test, D. W. (2015). CEC’s standards for classifying the evidence base of practices in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 36(4), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514557271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courtemanche, A., Sheldon, J., Sherman, J., Schroeder, S., Bell, A., & House, R. (2014). Assessing the effects of a staff training package on the treatment integrity of an intervention for self-injurious behavior. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 26(4), 371–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-014-9372-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devlin, P. (2005). Effect of continuous improvement training on student interaction and engagement. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 30(2), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.30.2.47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, S. N., McNaughton, D., & Light, J. (2013). Online training for paraeducators to support the communication of young children. Journal of Early Intervention, 35(3), 223–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815114526782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, S. N., Chapin, S. E., & Nolan, J. F. (2016). Special education teachers’ experiences supporting and supervising paraeducators: Implications for special and general education settings. Teacher Education and Special Education, 39(1), 60–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406415616443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durand, V. M., & Moskowitz, L. (2015). Functional communication training: Thirty years of treating challenging behavior. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 35(2), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121415569509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ennis, R. P., Royer, D. J., Lane, K. L., & Dunlap, K. D. (2020). Behavior-specific praise in pre-K–12 settings: Mapping the 50-year knowledge base. Behavioral Disorders, 45(3), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742919843075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, S. W., Schultz, B. K., & DeMars, C. E. (2014). High school-based treatment for adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: results from a pilot study examining outcomes and dosage. School Psychology Review, 43(2), 185–202.

  • Fisher, M., & Pleasants, S. L. (2012). Roles, responsibilities, and concerns of paraeducators: Findings from a statewide survey. Remedial and Special Education, 33(5), 287–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, T. L., Sindelar, P. T., Kramer, D., & Bettini, E. (2021). Are paraprofessionals being hired to replace special educators? A study of paraprofessional employment.Exceptional Children. 001440292110625. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029211062595

  • French, N. K. (2001). Supervising paraprofessionals: A survey of teacher practices. The Journal of Special Education, 35(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246690103500105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giangreco, M. F., Suter, J. C., & Doyle, M. B. (2010). Paraprofessionals in inclusive schools: A review of recent research. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 20(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474410903535356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghere, G., & York-Barr, J. (2007). Paraprofessional turnover and retention in inclusive programs: Hidden costs and promising practices. Remedial and Special Education, 28(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325070280010301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagaman, J. L., & Casey, K. J. (2018). Teacher attrition in special education: Perspectives from the field. Teacher Education and Special Education, 41(4), 277–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406417725797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagermoser Sanetti, L. M., Fallon, L. M., & Collier-Meek, M. A. (2013). Increasing teacher treatment integrity through performance feedback provided by school personnel. Psychology in the Schools, 50(2), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampden-Thompson, G., Diehl, J., & Kinukawa, A. (2007). Description and employment criteria of instructional paraprofessionals. http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2007008.

  • Jones, C. R., Ratcliff, N. J., Sheehan, H., & Hunt, G. H. (2012). An analysis of teachers’ and paraeducators’ roles and responsibilities with implications for professional development. Early Childhood Education Journal, 40(1), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-011-0487-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledford, J. R., & Gast, D. L. (2014). Measuring procedural fidelity in behavioural research. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24(3–4), 332–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2013.861352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledford, J. R., & Wolery, M. (2013). Procedural fidelity: An analysis of measurement and reporting practices. Journal of Early Intervention, 35(2), 173–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815113515908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makel, M. C., & Plucker, J. A. (2014). Facts are more important than novelty: Replication in the education sciences. Educational Researcher, 43(6), 304–316. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14545513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahon, J. (2018). An experimental and descriptive analysis of a multilevel consultation model to support paraprofessionals in implementing behavioral interventions in an early childhood special education setting [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Oregon]. University of Oregon Scholars’ Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/1794/23704

  • Malmgren, K. W., Causton-Theoharis, J. N., & Trezek, B. J. (2005). Increasing peer interactions for students with behavioral disorders via paraprofessional training. Behavioral Disorders, 31(1), 95–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R. A., Gunersel, A. B., Irvin, D. W., Wills, H. P., Gregori, E., An, Z. G., & Ingram, P. B. (2021). From the frontlines: Perceptions of paraprofessionals’ roles and responsibilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 44(2), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406419896627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch, E. B., & Noonan, M. J. (2013). Impact of online training videos on the implementation of mand training by three elementary school paraprofessionals. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48(1), 132–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merle, J. L., Thayer, A. J., Larson, M. F., Pauling, S., Cook, C. R., Rios, J. A., McGinnis, J. L., & Sullivan, M. M. (2022). Investigating strategies to increase general education teachers’ adherence to evidence-based social-emotional behavior practices: A meta-analysis of the single-case literature. Journal of School Psychology, 91(July 2020), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2021.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Keeffe, B. V., Slocum, T. A., & Magnusson, R. (2011). The effects of a fluency training package on paraprofessionals’ presentation of a reading intervention. Journal of Special Education, 47(1), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466911404072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, R. M., & Reschly, D. J. (2007). Effective classroom management: Teacher preparation and professional development. TQ Connection Issue Paper. National comprehensive center for teacher quality.

  • Parrish, T., & Harr-Robins, J. (2011). Fiscal policy and funding for special education. In J.M. Kauffman & Hallahan, D.P (Eds.), Handbook of Special Education (pp. 368–382). Routledge

  • Peyton, D. J., Acosta, K., Harvey, A., Pua, D. J., Sindelar, P. T., Mason-Williams, L., Dewey, J., Fisher, T. L., & Crews, E. (2020). Special education teacher shortage: Differences between high and low shortage states. Teacher Education and Special Education, 00, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406420906618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, A. L., & National Education Association, W. D. (1994). Paraprofessionals in the education workforce.

  • Probst, K. M., & Walker, V. L. (2017). Using the system of least prompts to teach personal hygiene skills to a high school student with comorbid visual impairment and autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 111(6), 511–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482x1711100603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quilty, K. M. (2007). Teaching paraprofessionals how to write and implement social stories for student with autism spectrum disorders. Remedial and Special Education, 28(3), 182–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325070280030701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redding, C., & Henry, G. T. (2018). New evidence on the frequency of teacher turnover: Accounting for within-year turnover. Educational Researcher, 47(9), 577–593. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x18814450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. E. (2011). Teaching paraprofessionals of students with autism to implement pivotal response treatment in inclusive school settings using a brief video feedback training package. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 26(2), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357611407063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638–641. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schepis, M. M., Ownbey, J. B., Parsons, M. B., & Reid, D. H. (2000). Training support staff for teaching young children with disabilities in an inclusive preschool setting. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2(3), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/109830070000200305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, M., & Kazemi, E. (2017). A review of training strategies to teach individuals implementation of behavioral interventions. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 37(1), 32–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2016.1267066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. M. (2017). Behavior skills training of differential reinforcement of alternative behavior for three paraprofessionals working in inclusive classrooms (Publication No. ED583930). [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburg]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

  • Soares, D. A., Harrison, J. R., Vannest, K. J., & McClelland, S. S. (2016). Effect size for token economy use in contemporary classroom settings: A meta-analysis of single-case research. School Psychology Review, 45(4), 379–399. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR45-4.379-399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, B. G., Klein, S. A., & Politylo, B. C. (2012). The effect of performance feedback on teachers’ treatment integrity: A meta-analysis of the single-case literature. School Psychology Review, 41(2), 160–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2012.12087518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, D., & Hirsh, S. (1997). A new vision for staff development. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD), Alexandria.

  • Stormont, M., Reinke, W. M., Newcomer, L., Marchese, D., & Lewis, C. (2015). Coaching teachers’ use of social behavior interventions to improve children’s outcomes: A review of the literature. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 17(2), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300714550657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suter, J. C., & Giangreco, M. F. (2009). Numbers that count: Exploring special education and paraprofessional service delivery in inclusion-oriented schools. Journal of Special Education, 43(2), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466907313353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Department of Education. (2004). Title I paraprofessionals: Non-regulatory guidance. Washington, DC. https://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/paraguidance.pdf

  • Villegas, A. M., & Davis, D. E. (2007). Approaches to diversifying the teaching force: Attending to issues of recruitment, preparation, and retention. Teacher Education Quarterly, 34(4), 137–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, V. L., & Smith, C. G. (2015). Training paraprofessionals to support students with disabilities: A literature review. Exceptionality, 23(3), 170–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2014.986606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, V. L., Douglas, K. H., & Chung, Y. C. (2017). An evaluation of paraprofessionals’ skills and training needs in supporting students with severe disabilities. International Journal of Special Education, 32(3), 460–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, V. L., Carpenter, M. E., Lyon, K. J., & Button, L. (2020). A meta-analysis of paraprofessional-delivered interventions to address challenging behavior among students with disabilities. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 23(2), 68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300720911147 Advance Online Publication.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wall, S., Davis, K. L., Crowley, A. L., & White, L. L. (2005). The urban paraeducator goes to college. Remedial and Special Education, 26(3), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193250502600306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westling, D. L. (2010). Teachers and challenging behavior: Knowledge, views, and practices. Remedial and Special Education, 31(1), 48–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yates, P., Chopra, R., Douglas, S., Walker, V., Schulze, R., Sobeck, E., & Morano, S. (2019). Preparing teachers for effective paraeducator supervision.Teacher Education Division policy brief. https://tedcec.org/sites/default/files/2020-12/TED-Brief-3-Para-Supervision-Revised-Final-PDF_0. pdf

  • Yell, M. L., Katsiyannis, A., & Bradley, M. R. (2011). The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: The evolution of special education law. In Handbook of special education (pp. 55–70). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kary Zarate.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Dr. Kary Zarate, kzarat2@illinois.edu

Current themes of research:

Paraprofessional Training.

Most relevant publications:

None related to paraprofessionals.

Courtney Barcus, cbarcus2@uic.edu

Current themes of research:

Special Educator Identity as related to Mathematics.

Most relevant publications:

None related to paraprofessionals.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 42 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zarate, K., Barcus, C.L. The treatment adherence of paraprofessional behavior training programs: a systematic literature review. Eur J Psychol Educ 38, 1317–1340 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-022-00646-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-022-00646-5

Keywords

Navigation