Abstract.
Specialist predators may respond strongly to sensory cues from preferred prey, but responses by generalist predators, although predicted to be less specific, are poorly known. Among squamate reptiles, diet and strength of response to chemical prey cues covary geographically in snakes that are specialist predators. There have been no previous studies of correspondence between diet and chemosensory response in lizards that are prey generalists. Actively foraging lizards discriminate between prey chemicals and control substances. It has been speculated that differential responses among prey species are unlikely in typical species that are dietary generalists. We examined this relationship in Podarcis lilfordi, an omnivorous lacertid that consumes a wide variety of animal prey. In experiments in which chemical stimuli were presented on cotton swabs, lizards responded more strongly to chemicals from a broad spectrum of prey types than to deionized water, an odorless control. These findings plus previous data showing that P. lilfordi is capable of prey chemical discrimination suggest that P. lilfordi can identify a wide range of potential prey using chemical cues. However, there was no evidence of differential response to stimuli among prey species, even in comparisons of prey included in the natural diet and potential prey not in the diet. The results, although limited to a single species, are consistent with the hypothesis that lizard species that are prey generalists do not exhibit the differential response strengths to chemical prey cues observed in snakes that have more specialized diets.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received in revised form: 17 July 2001
Electronic Publication
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cooper, W.E., Pérez-Mellado, V. Responses by a generalist predator, the Balearic lizard Podarcis lilfordi, to chemical cues from taxonomically diverse prey. acta ethol 4, 119–124 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s102110100051
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s102110100051