Abstract
The interactions between plants and their pollinators are the result of convergent evolution of floral attributes reflecting pressure exerted by pollinators. Nonetheless, the strategies employed by floral visitors to collect floral resources are extremely complex, and commonly involve theft or robbery in addition to pollination. We describe here the behavioral repertory of Apis mellifera during the collection of the floral resources, and evaluated the robbing rates of A. mellifera on the buds and flowers of Pyrostegia venusta during periods of intense and sparse flowering. We recorded the behaviors exhibited by foraging bees while collecting floral resources, quantified the numbers of floral buds and flowers with perforations in their corolla tissues, and determined whether that damage reduced nectar production. The evaluations were conducted during two distinct periods: during the period of intense flowering of P. venusta, and during the period of sparse flowering. Nectar robbing was observed during 93.4% of the visits of foraging A. mellifera bees, while nectar theft was observed during only 0.7% of the visits, and pollen theft during 5.9%. The robbing of floral buds and flowers was most intense during the period of heavy flowering. Flowers that had been intensely robbed secreted significantly less nectar than those non-robbed. The unusual nectar robbing activities of A. mellifera, especially during the period of intense flowering indicates an optimization of access to larger volumes of food resources. Our results therefore point to a major limitation of nectar per floral unit during the intense flowering period of P. venusta due to the high activity of nectar robbing by A. mellifera bees.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Alcantara S, Lohmann LG (2010) Evolution of floral morphology and pollination system in Bignonieae (Bignoniaceae). Am J Bot 97:782–796. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0900182
Alvares CA, Stape JL, Sentelhas PC, Moraes Gonçalves JL, Sparovek G (2013) Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorol Zeitschrift 22:711–728. https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507
Ayres M, Ayres-Jr M, Ayres DL, Santos AAS (2007) BioEstat: aplicações estatísticas nas áreas das ciências bio-médicas. Sociedade Civil Mamirauá, Belém
Baronio GJ, Brito VLG, Nogueira A, Rech AR (2020) Beyond robbery: the role of upside-down behaviour performed by small oil-collecting bees in Malpighiaceae. Arthropod-Plant Inte 14:613–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-020-09770-9
Bronstein JL, Barker JL, Lichtenberg EM, Richardson LL, Irwin RE (2017) The behavioral ecology of nectar robbing: why be tactic constant? Curr Opin Insect Sci 21:14–18
Carbonari V, Polatto LP, Alves-Junior VV (2009) Evaluation of the impact on Pyrostegia venusta (Bignoniaceae) flowers due to nectar robbery by Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Sociobiology 54:373–382
Curti RN, Ortega-Baes P (2011) Relationship between floral traits and floral visitors in two coexisting Tecoma species (Bignoniaceae). Plant Syst Evol 293:207–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-011-0436-0
Dawson B, Trapp RG (2003) Bioestatística básica e clínica, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, Rio de Janeiro
Dedej S, Delaplane KS (2005) Net energetic advantage drives honey bees (Apis mellifera L) to nectar larceny in Vaccinium ashei Reade. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 57:398–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-004-0852-z
Fenster CB, Armbruster WS, Wilson P, Dudash MR, Thomson JD (2004) Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:375–403. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132347
Inouye DW (1980) The terminology of floral larceny. Ecology 61:1251–1253. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132347
Irwin RE, Adler LS, Brody AK (2004) The dual role of floral traits: pollinator attraction and plant defense. Ecology 85:1503–1511. https://doi.org/10.1890/03-0390
Irwin RE, Bronstein JL, Manson JS, Richardson L (2010) Nectar robbing: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 41:271–292. https://doi.org/10.1201/02-71$20.00
Lorenzi H, Souza HM (1995) Plantas ornamentais no Brasil: arbustivas, herbáceas e trepadeiras. Plantarum, Nova Odessa
Maloof JE, Inouye DW (2000) Are nectar robbers cheaters or mutualists? Ecology 81:2651–2661. https://doi.org/10.2307/177331
Maruyama PK, Vizentin-Bugoni J, Dalsgaard B, Sazima I, Sazima M (2015) Nectar robbery by a hermit hummingbird: association to floral phenotype and its influence on flowers and network structure. Oecologia 178:783–793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-015-3275-9
Polatto LP, Alves-Jr VV (2008) Utilização dos recursos florais pelos visitantes em Sparattosperma leucanthum (Vell.) K. Schum. (Bignoniaceae). Neotrop Entomol 37:389–398. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-566X2008000400006
Polatto LP, Chaud-Netto J, Dutra JCS, Junior VVA (2012) Exploitation of floral resources on Sparattosperma leucanthum (Bignoniaceae): foraging activity of the pollinators and the nectar and pollen thieves. Acta Ethol 15:119–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-011-0116-7
Polatto LP, Chaud-Netto J, Junior VV, Dutra JCS (2011) The effects of nectar-robbing on fruit production in Sparattosperma leucanthum (Bignoniaceae). Sociobiology 57:223–235
Polatto LP, Dutra JCS, Junior VVA (2007) Biologia reprodutiva de Pyrostegia venusta (Ker-Gawl) Miers (Bignoniaceae) e comportamento de forrageamento dos visitantes florais predominantes. Rev Biol Neotrop 4:46–57
Pyke GH (1982) Foraging in bumblebees: rule of departure from an inflorescence. Can J Zool 60:417–428. https://doi.org/10.1139/z82-057
Richman SK, Irwin RE, Nelson CJ, Bronstein JL (2017) Facilitated exploitation of pollination mutualisms: fitness consequences for plants. J Ecol 105:188–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12657
Sampson BJ, Danka RG, Stringer SJ (2004) Nectar robbery by bees Xylocopa virginica and Apis mellifera contributes to the pollination of rabbiteye blueberry. J Econ Entomol 97:735–740. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/97.3.735
Silva KN, Dutra JCS, Nucci M, Polatto LP (2013) Influência dos fatores ambientais e da quantidade de néctar na atividade de forrageio de abelhas em flores de Adenocalymma bracteatum (Cham.) DC. (Bignoniaceae). EntomoBrasilis 6:193–201. https://doi.org/10.12741/ebrasilis.v6i3.295
Traveset A, Willson MF, Sabag C (1998) Effect of nectar-robbing birds on fruit set of Fuchsia magellanica in Tierra Del Fuego: a disrupted mutualism. Funct Ecol 12:459–464. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.1998.00212.x
Urcelay C, Morales CL, Chalcoff VR (2006) Relationship between corolla length and floral larceny in the South American hummingbird-pollinated Campsidium valdivianum (Bignoniaceae). Ann Bot Fenn 43:205–211
Varma S, Rajesh TP, Manoj K, Asha G, Jobiraj T, Sinu PA (2020) Nectar robbers deter legitimate pollinators by mutilating flowers. Oikos 129:868–878. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.06988
Varma S, Sinu PA (2019) Nectar robbing in bellflower (Sesamum radiatum) benefited pollinators but unaffected maternal function of plant reproduction. Sci Rep 9:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44741-y
Vitorino BD, Frota AVB, Andrade ALP (2016) Comportamento pilhador do beija-flor chifre-de-ouro (Heliactin bilophus) (Aves: Trochilidae) em duas espécies de plantas dos gêneros Amphilophium Kunth (Bignoniaceae) e Sinningia Nees (Gesneriaceae). Biota Amazôn 6:104–106. https://doi.org/10.18561/2179-5746
Waddington KD (1980) Flight patterns of foraging bees relative to density of artificial flowers and distribution of nectar. Oecologia 44:199–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00572680
Zimmerman M, Cook S (1985) Pollinator foraging, experimental nectar-robbing and plant fitness in Impatiens capensis. Am Midl Nat 113:84–91. https://doi.org/10.2307/2425350
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Leandro P. Polatto conceived the main idea of the research; collected, processed, and analyzed the samples; and wrote the text; Valter V. Alves Junior contributed to the interpretation of the data, and to the writing of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing of interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary file1 (MP4 29685 KB)
Supplementary file2 (MP4 21700 KB)
Supplementary file3 (MP4 25526 KB)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Polatto, L.P., Alves-Junior, V.V. Primary nectar robbing by Apis mellifera (Apidae) on Pyrostegia venusta (Bignoniaceae): behavior, pillaging rate, and its consequences. acta ethol 25, 25–32 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-021-00383-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-021-00383-w