Abstract
Brainstem cavernous malformations (CMs) encompass up to 20% of all intracranial CMs and are considered more aggressive than cerebral CMs because of their high annual bleeding rates. Microsurgical resection remains the primary treatment modality for CMs, but long-term functional outcomes and complications are heterogenous in the literature. The authors performed a systematic review on brainstem CMs in 4 databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library, and Google Scholar. We included studies that reported on the long-term functional outcomes and complications of brainstem CMs microsurgical resection. A meta-analysis was performed and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The search yielded 4781 results, of which 19 studies met our inclusion criteria. Microsurgery was performed on 940 patients (mean age 35 years, 46.9% females). Most of the brainstem CMs were located in the pons (n = 475). The pooled proportions of improved, stable, and worsened functional outcomes after microsurgical resection of brainstem CMs were 56.7% (95% CI 48.4–64.6), 28.6% (95% CI 22.4–35.7), and 12.6% (95% CI 9.6–16.2), respectively. CMs located in the medulla were significantly (p = 0.003) associated with a higher proportion of improved outcome compared with those in the pons and midbrain. Complete resection was achieved in 93.3% (95% CI 89.8–95.7). The immediate postoperative complication rate was 37.2% (95% CI 29.3–45.9), with new-onset cranial nerve deficit being the most common complication. The permanent morbidity rate was 17.3% (95% CI 10.5–27.1), with a low mortality rate of 1% from the compiled study population during a mean follow-up of 58 months. Our analysis indicates that microsurgical resection of brainstem CMs can result in favorable long-term functional outcomes with transient complications in the majority of patients. Complete microsurgical resection of the CM is associated with a lower incidence of CM hemorrhage and the morbidity related to it.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data and materials used in this systematic review are available upon request.
References
Robinson JR, Awad IA, Magdinec M, Paranandi L (1993) Factors predisposing to clinical disability in patients with cavernous malformations of the brain. Neurosurgery 32:730–735; discussion 735–736. https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-199305000-00005
Simard JM, Garcia-Bengochea F, Ballinger WE et al (1986) Cavernous angioma: a review of 126 collected and 12 new clinical cases. Neurosurgery 18:162–172. https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-198602000-00008
Moriarity JL, Clatterbuck RE, Rigamonti D (1999) The natural history of cavernous malformations. Neurosurg Clin N Am 10:411–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1042-3680(18)30175-X
Taslimi S, Modabbernia A, Amin-Hanjani S et al (2016) Natural history of cavernous malformation: Systematic review and meta-analysis of 25 studies. Neurology 86:1984–1991. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002701
Lawton MT, Kim H, McCulloch CE et al (2010) A supplementary grading scale for selecting patients with brain arteriovenous malformations for surgery. Neurosurgery 66:702–713; discussion 713. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000367555.16733.E1
Garcia RM, Ivan ME, Lawton MT (2015) Brainstem cavernous malformations: surgical results in 104 patients and a proposed grading system to predict neurological outcomes. Neurosurgery 76:265. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000000602
Potts MB, Young WL, Lawton MT (2013) Deep arteriovenous malformations in the basal ganglia, thalamus, and insula: microsurgical management, techniques, and results. Neurosurgery 73:417–429. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000000004
Hori T, Chernov M, Alshebib YA et al (2023) Long-term outcomes after surgery for brainstem cavernous malformations: analysis of 46 consecutive cases. J Neurosurg 138:900–909. https://doi.org/10.3171/2022.7.JNS22314
Nathal E, Patiño-Rodriguez HM, Arauz A et al (2018) Risk factors for unfavorable outcomes in surgically treated brainstem cavernous malformations. World Neurosurg 111:e478–e484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.12.105
Li D, Jiao Y-M, Wang L et al (2018) Surgical outcome of motor deficits and neurological status in brainstem cavernous malformations based on preoperative diffusion tensor imaging: a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Neurosurg 130:286–301. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.8.JNS17854
Zhang S, Lin S, Hui X et al (2017) Surgical treatment of cavernous malformations involving medulla oblongata. J Clin Neurosci Off J Neurosurg Soc Australas 37:63–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2016.11.014
Zhang S, Li H, Liu W et al (2016) Surgical treatment of hemorrhagic brainstem cavernous malformations. Neurol India 64:1210–1219. https://doi.org/10.4103/0028-3886.193825
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Banks JL, Marotta CA (2007) Outcomes validity and reliability of the modified Rankin scale: implications for stroke clinical trials: a literature review and synthesis. Stroke 38:1091–1096. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000258355.23810.c6
de Haan R, Aaronson N, Limburg M et al (1993) Measuring quality of life in stroke. Stroke 24:320–327. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.24.2.320
Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D et al (n.d.) The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomized Studies in Meta- Analysis. Canada. https://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp
Sterne JA, Egger M (2001) Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis. J Clin Epidemiol 54:1046–1055. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(01)00377-8
Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315:629–634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
Viechtbauer W (2010) Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package. J Stat Softw 36:1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03
R Core Team (2021) R: A Language and environment for statistical computing. Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
Lipsey MW, Wilson DB (2001) Practical meta-analysis. Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, US
Goto Y, Hino A, Hashimoto N (2021) A comparative analysis of the modified Rankin Scale, Karnofsky Performance Status and Kurtzke expanded disability status scale in the perioperative management of patients with brainstem cavernous malformations. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 207:106785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106785
Menon G, Gopalakrishnan CV, Rao BRM et al (2011) A single institution series of cavernomas of the brainstem. J Clin Neurosci Off J Neurosurg Soc Australas 18:1210–1214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2011.01.022
Huang AP-H, Chen J-S, Yang C-C et al (2010) Brain stem cavernous malformations. J Clin Neurosci Off J Neurosurg Soc Australas 17:74–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2009.06.009
Oertel J, Fischer G, Linsler S et al (2022) Endoscope-assisted resection of brainstem cavernous malformations. Neurosurg Rev 45:2823–2836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-022-01793-5
Li D, Yang Y, Hao S-Y et al (2013) Hemorrhage risk, surgical management, and functional outcome of brainstem cavernous malformations. J Neurosurg 119:996–1008. https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.7.JNS13462
Cannizzaro D, Sabatino G, Mancarella C et al (2019) Management and surgical approaches of brainstem cavernous malformations: our experience and literature review. Asian J Neurosurg 14:131–139. https://doi.org/10.4103/ajns.AJNS_290_17
Velz J, Özkaratufan S, Krayenbühl N et al (2022) Pediatric brainstem cavernous malformations: 2-center experience in 40 children. J Neurosurg Pediatr 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3171/2022.1.PEDS21538
Kikuta K, Nozaki K, Takahashi JA et al (2004) Postoperative evaluation of microsurgical resection for cavernous malformations of the brainstem. J Neurosurg 101:607–612. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2004.101.4.0607
Lashkarivand A, Ringstad G, Eide PK (2020) Surgery for brainstem cavernous malformations: association between preoperative grade and postoperative quality of life. Oper Neurosurg Hagerstown Md 18:590–598. https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opz337
Xie M-G, Xiao X-R, Guo F-Z et al (2018) Surgical management and functional outcomes of cavernous malformations involving the medulla oblongata. World Neurosurg 119:e643–e652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.07.229
Li D, Hao S-Y, Tang J et al (2014) Surgical management of pediatric brainstem cavernous malformations. J Neurosurg Pediatr 13:484–502. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.2.PEDS13536
Mai JC, Ramanathan D, Kim LJ, Sekhar LN (2013) Surgical resection of cavernous malformations of the brainstem: evolution of a minimally invasive technique. World Neurosurg 79:691–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2012.04.030
Ren Y, Li J, Tao C et al (2017) Surgical treatment of cavernous malformations involving the midbrain: a single-center case series of 34 patients. World Neurosurg 107:753–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.08.117
Xie S, Xiao X-R, Li H et al (2020) Surgical treatment of pontine cavernous malformations via subtemporal transtentorial and intradural anterior transpetrosal approaches. Neurosurg Rev 43:1179–1189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-019-01156-7
Porter RW, Detwiler PW, Spetzler RF et al (1999) Cavernous malformations of the brainstem: experience with 100 patients. J Neurosurg 90:50–58. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1999.90.1.0050
Wang C, Liu A, Zhang J et al (2003) Surgical management of brain-stem cavernous malformations: report of 137 cases. Surg Neurol 59:444–454; discussion 454. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-3019(03)00187-3
Hasegawa T, McInerney J, Kondziolka D et al (2002) Long-term results after stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with cavernous malformations. Neurosurgery 50:1190–1197; discussion 1197–1198. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-200206000-00003
Bozinov O, Hatano T, Burkhardt JK et al (2010) Current clinical management of brainstem cavernomas. Swiss Med Wkly 140:w13120–w13120. https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2010.13120
Zuurbier SM, Hickman CR, Rinkel LA et al (2022) Association between beta-blocker or statin drug use and the risk of hemorrhage from cerebral cavernous malformations. Stroke 53:2521–2527. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.037009
Lanfranconi S, Scola E, Meessen JMTA et al (2023) Safety and efficacy of propranolol for treatment of familial cerebral cavernous malformations (Treat_CCM): a randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint, phase 2 pilot trial. Lancet Neurol 22:35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00409-4
Oldenburg J, Malinverno M, Globisch MA et al (2021) Propranolol reduces the development of lesions and rescues barrier function in cerebral cavernous malformations: a preclinical study. Stroke 52:1418–1427. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.029676
Shenkar R, Moore T, Benavides C et al (2022) Propranolol as therapy for cerebral cavernous malformations: a cautionary note. J Transl Med 20:160. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-022-03360-4
Loan JJM, Bacon A, van Beijnum J et al (2023) Feasibility of comparing medical management and surgery (with neurosurgery or stereotactic radiosurgery) with medical management alone in people with symptomatic brain cavernoma - protocol for the Cavernomas: A Randomised Effectiveness (CARE) pilot trial. BMJ Open 13:e075187. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075187
Catapano JS, Benner D, Rhodenhiser EG et al (2023) Safety of brainstem safe entry zones: comparison of microsurgical outcomes associated with superficial, exophytic, and deep brainstem cavernous malformations. J Neurosurg 139:113–123. https://doi.org/10.3171/2022.9.JNS222012
Catapano JS, Rumalla K, Srinivasan VM et al (2022) A taxonomy for brainstem cavernous malformations: subtypes of medullary lesions. J Neurosurg 138:128–146. https://doi.org/10.3171/2022.3.JNS22626
Catapano JS, Rumalla K, Srinivasan VM et al (2022) A taxonomy for brainstem cavernous malformations: subtypes of pontine lesions. Part 1: basilar, peritrigeminal, and middle peduncular. J Neurosurg 137:1462–1476. https://doi.org/10.3171/2022.1.JNS212690
Catapano JS, Rumalla K, Srinivasan VM et al (2022) A taxonomy for brainstem cavernous malformations: subtypes of pontine lesions. Part 2: inferior peduncular, rhomboid, and supraolivary. J Neurosurg 137:1477–1490. https://doi.org/10.3171/2022.1.JNS212691
Catapano JS, Rumalla K, Srinivasan VM et al (2021) A taxonomy for brainstem cavernous malformations: subtypes of midbrain lesions. J Neurosurg 136:1667–1686. https://doi.org/10.3171/2021.8.JNS211694
Gross BA, Batjer HH, Awad IA et al (2013) Brainstem cavernous malformations: 1390 surgical cases from the literature. World Neurosurg 80:89–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2012.04.002
Li D, Wu Z-Y, Liu P-P et al (2020) Natural history of brainstem cavernous malformations: prospective hemorrhage rate and adverse factors in a consecutive prospective cohort. J Neurosurg 134:917–928. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.12.JNS192856
Kearns KN, Chen C-J, Tvrdik P et al (2019) Outcomes of surgery for brainstem cavernous malformations. Stroke 50:2964–2966. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026120
Cenzato M, Stefini R, Ambrosi C, Giovanelli M (2008) Post-operative remnants of brainstem cavernomas: incidence, risk factors and management. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 150:879–886; discussion 887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-008-0008-4
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Kristin Kraus, MSc for her editorial assistance.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
HA, WC, JM, MTL, MJL, MAL: conception and design, provision of study patient, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript writing, final approval of the manuscript. CK, OB, IA, AS, and AM: collection and assembly of data, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript writing. All authors: manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
10143_2023_2152_MOESM1_ESM.png
Supplementary file1 (PNG 36 KB) Supplementary Figure 1: Newcastle-Ottawa scale for non-randomized studies to determine the quality of the studies
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Albalkhi, I., Shafqat, A., Bin-Alamer, O. et al. Long-term functional outcomes and complications of microsurgical resection of brainstem cavernous malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Rev 46, 252 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-023-02152-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-023-02152-8