Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Three underdogs among galenic veins: anatomical analysis and literature review of surgical relevant veins in the quadrigeminal cistern

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurosurgical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent studies (Alaou-Ismaili et al. 2020; Kilic et al. Eur J Radiol 56:212–219, 2005) among experienced sub-specialized neurosurgeons described divergent perceptions of surgical risk for venous sacrifice in posterior fossa surgery. Three galenic veins stood out as controversial in venous risk assessment and underexplored in the literature: the internal occipital vein (IOV), the precentral cerebellar vein (PCV), and the superior vermian vein (SVV). We have conducted a narrative review based on a systematic literature search to analyze terminology and anatomic descriptions and to suggest a coherent synthesis of published data on these veins. A systematic PubMed literature search was carried out using the keywords: “posterior fossa,” “venous anatomy,” and “radiology.” Relevant radiological, microsurgical, and anatomical articles were selected if they described the anatomy of the three veins. Anatomical descriptions were analyzed with hermeneutic methodology alongside the articles’ radiological and anatomical dissection pictures. New illustrations were created to depict the synthesized image of the venous anatomy. A total of 13 articles described the anatomy and terminology of the relevant veins. The descriptions of the IOV included smaller non-occipital vessels that confused the identification of the vessel. IOV is analyzed to be the vein draining the primary visual cortex, which drains into the vein of Galen (VG). The PCV and SVV enter the VG from below and are fused in almost half of all studied patients, creating a third vessel by the name of the superior cerebellar vein. A conscientious narrative review and hermeneutic analysis produced a synthesized, uniform picture of terminology and anatomy. Consensus on anatomical descriptions and definitions are indispensable for validation of anatomy, research into anatomical variation, for surgical planning and documentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All of the included data used in this manuscript are denoted in the reference list.

Materials availability

All of the included data used in this manuscript are denoted in the reference list.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Alaou-Ismaili A, Krogager ME, Jakola AS, Poulsgaard L, Couldwell W, Mathiesen T (2020) Surgeons’ experience of venous risk with CPA surgery. Neurosurg Rev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-020-01365-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aubin ML, Philippon J, Viano J, Metzger J (1972) Phlebogram of the posterior fossa. Its value in the diagnosis of expansive infra-tentorial processes. Journal de Radiologie, D’electrologie, et de Medicine Nucleaire 53(1):55–60

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chaynes P (2003) Microsurgical anatomy of the great cerebral vein of Galen and its tributaries. J Neurosurg 99:1028–1038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Duvernoy HM (1975) The superficial veins of the human brain. Springer-Verlag. ISBN10: 3540068767

  5. Elhammady MS, Heros RC (2015) Cerebral veins: to sacrifice or not to sacrifice, that is the question. World Neurosurgery 83(3):320–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Huang YP, Wolf BS (1965) The veins of the posterior fossa – superior or galenic draining group. Am J Roentgenol Radium Therapy Nuclear Med 95:808–821

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Galligioni F, Bernardi R, Pellone M, Iraci G (1970) The veins of the posterior cranial fossa: an angiographic study under pathologic conditions. Am J Roentgenol Radium Therapy Nuclear Med 110(1):39–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. George AE (1974) A systematic approach to the interpretation of the posterior fossa angiography. Radiol Clin North Am 12(2):371–399

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Giordano M, Wrede KH, Stieglitz LH, Culumbano L, Samii M, Lüdemann WO (2009) Depiction of small veins draining into the vein of Galen using preoperative 3-dimensional navigation in living patients. Neurosurgery 64:247–252

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kilic T, Ozduman K, Cavdar S, Özek MM, Pamin MN (2005) The galenic venous system: surgical anatomy and its angiographic and magnetic resonance venographic correlations. Eur J Radiol 56:212–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Krogager ME, Jakola AS, Poulsgaard L, Couldwell W, Mathiesen T (2019) Safe handling of veins in the pineal region – a mixed-method study. Neurosurg Rev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-019-01189-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Matsuo S, Baydin S, Güngör A, Miki K, Komune N, Kurogi R, Iihara K, Rhoton AL (2017) Midline and off-midline infratentorial supracerebellar approaches to the pineal gland. J Neurosurg 126(6):1984–1994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Matsushima T, Rhoton AL, Oliveira E, Peace D (1983) Microsurgical anatomy of the veins of the posterior fossa. J Neurosurg 59:63–105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mizukami M, Mine T (1970) Diagnostic value of the precentral cerebellar vein in cases of the posterior fossa tumors. Keio J Med 19:195–204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rhoton AL (2000) The posterior fossa veins. Neurosurgery 47:S69–S92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schilling H, Lehmann R (1976) Topographic measurement of the superior vermian vein by lateral vertebral phlebography. Neuroradiology 11:53–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Serrano R, Babin E, Amor MB, Megret M (1972) Radio-anatomy of the internal occipital veins. Neuroradiology 3:153–154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Smrcka M, Navratil O (2021) What is the risk of venous cerebellar infarction in the supracerebellar infratentorial approach? Neurosurg Rev 44:897–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Suzuki Y, Nakajima M, Ikeda H, Abe T (2005) Three-dimensional computed tomography angiography of the galenic system for the occipital transtentorial approach. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 45:387–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ueyama T, Al-Mefty O, Tamaki N (1998) Bridging veins on the tentorial surface of the cerebellum: a microsurgical anatomic study and operative considerations. Neurosurgery 43:1137–1145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wackenheim A, Braun JP (1978) The veins of the posterior fossa: normal and pathologic findings. Springer-Verlag. ISBN10: 3642667147.

  22. Yang A, Folzenlogen Z, Youssef AS (2018) Minimally invasive endoscopic-assisted approaches to the posterior fossa. J Neurosurg Sci 62:658

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This particular research was only economically backed from The Reseacch Fund of Rigshospitalet through a part-time research scholarship granted for the corresponding author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark

    M. E. Krogager, B. Jespersen & T. I. Mathiesen

  2. IKM University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    T. I. Mathiesen

  3. Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden

    T. I. Mathiesen

  4. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark

    G. Benndorf

  5. Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA

    G. Benndorf

Authors
  1. M. E. Krogager
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. Jespersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. T. I. Mathiesen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. G. Benndorf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Anatomical analysis and synthesis: M. Krogager and B. Jespersen. Manuscript writing and editing: M. Krogager, G. Benndorf, and T. Mathiesen. Novel anatomical illustrations: B. Jespersen and M. Krogager.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. E. Krogager.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krogager, M.E., Jespersen, B., Mathiesen, T.I. et al. Three underdogs among galenic veins: anatomical analysis and literature review of surgical relevant veins in the quadrigeminal cistern. Neurosurg Rev 45, 3245–3258 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-022-01842-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-022-01842-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation